Abstract
Sustainable development is a process in which present and future human needs can be satisfied without degrading the socio-environmental systems that they rely upon. Inland wetlands are diverse ecosystems that provide numerous goods and services. Current wetland evaluation methodologies include inventories, monitoring of hydrological and climatic variables, population dynamic studies, mechanistic models, the use of geographical information systems, and measuring of biotic indices. Sustainability evaluation methods, which combine in a systemic approach production efficiency, ecosystem function, environmental services, and social values are required. In this study, a methodological framework was developed and applied to a case in the High Lerma River Basin in Central Mexico. Criteria and indicators comprising the environmental, economic, and social dimensions, as well as systemic attributes such as productivity, stability, resilience, self-reliance, and equity were derived and measured to evaluate wetland management systems. Native species were compared to the predominant carp monoculture system. Results from the evaluated indicators showed that the native species multicultural management system can be a feasible, profitable, and self-reliant conservation and utilization alternative. Some difficulties were faced in finding reliable estimates to be used as reference values, and potential indicators for future, long-term evaluations are proposed. The application of sustainability indicators to wetland management proved to be an objective and trustworthy methodological alternative, which could increase both wetland sustainability and the continuous development of integrated assessment tools for its evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamus PR, Stockwell LT et al (1991) Wetland evaluation technique (WET) Vol. I Literature review and evaluation rationale. Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg
Albores B (1995) Tules y Sirenas: El impacto Ecológico y Cultural de la Industrialización en el Alto Lerma. El Colegio Mexiquense, México
Arredondo-Figueroa JL (1983) Aquatic animal species of nutritional importance introduced in Mexico. Biotica 8:175–199
Bailey J (1984) Principles of wildlife management. Wiley, NY
Bekefi E, Varadi L (2007) Multifunctional pond fish farms in Hungary. Aquacult Int 15:227–233
Boyd C (1978) Water quality in warmwater fish ponds. Auburn University, Alabama
Brazner JC, Danz NP et al (2007) Evaluation of geographic, geomorphic and human influences on Great Lakes wetland indicators: a multi-assemblage approach. Ecol Indic 7:610–635
Conway G (1985) Agroecosystem analysis. Agric Adm 20:31–55
de Groot RS, Wilson MA et al (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408
De la Lanza G, García JL (2002) Lagos y presas de México. AGT, México
Dey MM, Alam F et al (2005) Constraints to increased yields in carp farming: implications for future genetic research. In: Penman DJ, Gupta MV, Dey MM (eds) Carp genetic resources for aquaculture in Asia. World Fish Center Technical Report 65
Ennabili A, Ater M, Radoux M (1998) Biomass production and NPK retention in macrophytes from wetlands of the Tingitan Peninsula. Aquat Bot 62:45–56
Farber SC, Costanza R et al (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:375–392
Foladori G, Tommasino H (2005) El enfoque técnico y el enfoque social de la ¿Sustentabilidad?. In: Foladori G, Pierre N (eds) ¿Sustentabilidad? Desacuerdos sobre el desarrollo sustentable. Porrua, México
Geilfus F (1998) Ochenta herramientas para el desarrollo participativo. Diagnóstico, Planificación, Monitoreo y Evaluación. GTZ/IICA, El Salvador
Huizar A, Jiménez J, Juárez C (2005) La laguna de Tecocomulco. Geo-ecología de un desastre. Publicación Especial 3, Instituto de Geología, UNAM, México
Janssen R, Goosen H et al (2005) Decision support for integrated wetland management. Environ Modell Softw 20:215–229
Jenkins KM, Boulton AJ, Ryder DS (2005) A common parched future? Research and management of Australian arid-zone floodplain wetlands. Hydrobiologia 552:57–73
Jimenez-Osornio JJ, Gomez-Pompa A (1991) Human role in shaping of the flora in a wetland community, the chinampa. Landsc Urban Plan 20:47–51
Lélé M (1991) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Dev 19(6):607–621
Loiselle S, Bastianoni S et al (2004) Neotropical wetlands: new instruments in ecosystem management. Wetlands Ecol Manage 12:587–596
Loiselle S, Rossi C et al (2001) The use of systems analysis methods in the sustainable management of wetlands. Hydrobiologia 458:191–200
López-Ridaura S, Masera O, Astier M (2002) Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. The MESMIS framework. Ecol Indic 2:135–148
Malca RP (1976) Polyculture systems with channel catfish as the principal species. Dissertation, Auburn University, Alabama
Masera O, Astier M, López-Ridaura S (1999) Sustentabilidad y Manejo de Recursos Naturales: El Marco de Evaluación MESMIS. Mundiprensa, México
Meadows DH (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. A report to the Balaton Group. Sustainability Institute, Hartland Four Corners, USA
Moctezuma A, González C et al (2007) Multiculture of native species in irrigation ponds. Livest Res Rural Dev 19(1):15
Mtahiko M, Gereta E et al (2006) Towards an ecohydrology-based restoration of the Usangu wetlands and the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania. Wetlands Ecol Manage 14(6):489–503
Potts T (2006) A framework for the analysis of sustainability indicators systems in fisheries. Ocean Coast Manage 49:259–280
Price T, Probert D (1997) Role of constructed wetlands in environmentally-sustainable developments. Appl Energy 57:129–174
Ramírez F (1999) Conservation, management, and sustainable utilization of wildlife. In: Avila S, Colín S, Muñoz C (comps). Economics of biodiversity. Compilation of the International Seminar on La Paz, BCS. SEMARNAP, Mexico pp 341–357
Roggeri H (1995) Tropical freshwater wetlands. A guide to current knowledge and sustainable management. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Rosas M (1976) Explotación piscícola en charcos temporales y permanentes en Michoacán. INP/S1:i66:38. Instituto Nacional de Pesca, México
SPP (1981) Síntesis Geográfica del Estado de México. Secretaría de Programación y Presupuesto, México
Sugiura Y (1998) La caza, la pesca y la recolección: Etnoarqueología del modo de subsistencia lacustre en las ciénegas del Alto Lerma. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM, México
Thiesing MA (2001) An evaluation of wetland assessment techniques and their applications to decision making. In: Finlayson CM, Davidson NC, Stevenson NJ (eds) Wetland inventory, assessment and monitoring: Practical techniques and identification of major issues. Proceedings of workshop 4, 2nd international conference on wetlands and development, Dakar, Senegal. Supervising Scientist Report 161. Darwin, Australia. Available from http://www.environment.gov.au/ssd/publications/ssr/pubs/techniques-ssr161.pdf. Cited 8 Mar 2007
Toledo A (1998) Economía de la Biodiversidad. PNUMA/ORPALC, México
Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM et al (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35:7–23
Vogel JH (2002) Markets or metaphors? A sustainable livelihoods approach to environmental services: two cases from Ecuador. IIED, London and Ecodecision, Quito
Von Wirén-Lehr S (2001) Sustainability in agriculture: an evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap between theory and practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:115–129
Woo M, Young KL (2006) High Arctic wetlands: their occurrence, hydrological characteristics and sustainability. J Hydrol 320:432–450
Zalidis GC, Gerakis A (1999) Evaluating sustainability of watershed resources management through wetland functional analysis. Environ Manage 24:193–207
Zalidis G, Takavakoglou V et al (2004). Re-establishing a sustainable wetland at former Lake Karla, Greece, using Ramsar restoration guidelines. Environ Manage 34:875–886
Acknowledgements
This case study was carried out with the support of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico (UAEM) and the National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT). The active participation of local farmers and their families is gratefully acknowledged, as well as the useful suggestions of two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moctezuma-Malagón, A., González-Esquivel, C.E., De la Lanza-Espino, G. et al. A methodology for evaluating the sustainability of inland wetland systems. Aquacult Int 16, 525–537 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9163-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9163-5