Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A methodology for evaluating the sustainability of inland wetland systems

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable development is a process in which present and future human needs can be satisfied without degrading the socio-environmental systems that they rely upon. Inland wetlands are diverse ecosystems that provide numerous goods and services. Current wetland evaluation methodologies include inventories, monitoring of hydrological and climatic variables, population dynamic studies, mechanistic models, the use of geographical information systems, and measuring of biotic indices. Sustainability evaluation methods, which combine in a systemic approach production efficiency, ecosystem function, environmental services, and social values are required. In this study, a methodological framework was developed and applied to a case in the High Lerma River Basin in Central Mexico. Criteria and indicators comprising the environmental, economic, and social dimensions, as well as systemic attributes such as productivity, stability, resilience, self-reliance, and equity were derived and measured to evaluate wetland management systems. Native species were compared to the predominant carp monoculture system. Results from the evaluated indicators showed that the native species multicultural management system can be a feasible, profitable, and self-reliant conservation and utilization alternative. Some difficulties were faced in finding reliable estimates to be used as reference values, and potential indicators for future, long-term evaluations are proposed. The application of sustainability indicators to wetland management proved to be an objective and trustworthy methodological alternative, which could increase both wetland sustainability and the continuous development of integrated assessment tools for its evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamus PR, Stockwell LT et al (1991) Wetland evaluation technique (WET) Vol. I Literature review and evaluation rationale. Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Albores B (1995) Tules y Sirenas: El impacto Ecológico y Cultural de la Industrialización en el Alto Lerma. El Colegio Mexiquense, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Arredondo-Figueroa JL (1983) Aquatic animal species of nutritional importance introduced in Mexico. Biotica 8:175–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey J (1984) Principles of wildlife management. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekefi E, Varadi L (2007) Multifunctional pond fish farms in Hungary. Aquacult Int 15:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd C (1978) Water quality in warmwater fish ponds. Auburn University, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazner JC, Danz NP et al (2007) Evaluation of geographic, geomorphic and human influences on Great Lakes wetland indicators: a multi-assemblage approach. Ecol Indic 7:610–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway G (1985) Agroecosystem analysis. Agric Adm 20:31–55

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Wilson MA et al (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Lanza G, García JL (2002) Lagos y presas de México. AGT, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey MM, Alam F et al (2005) Constraints to increased yields in carp farming: implications for future genetic research. In: Penman DJ, Gupta MV, Dey MM (eds) Carp genetic resources for aquaculture in Asia. World Fish Center Technical Report 65

  • Ennabili A, Ater M, Radoux M (1998) Biomass production and NPK retention in macrophytes from wetlands of the Tingitan Peninsula. Aquat Bot 62:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber SC, Costanza R et al (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:375–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foladori G, Tommasino H (2005) El enfoque técnico y el enfoque social de la ¿Sustentabilidad?. In: Foladori G, Pierre N (eds) ¿Sustentabilidad? Desacuerdos sobre el desarrollo sustentable. Porrua, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Geilfus F (1998) Ochenta herramientas para el desarrollo participativo. Diagnóstico, Planificación, Monitoreo y Evaluación. GTZ/IICA, El Salvador

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizar A, Jiménez J, Juárez C (2005) La laguna de Tecocomulco. Geo-ecología de un desastre. Publicación Especial 3, Instituto de Geología, UNAM, México

  • Janssen R, Goosen H et al (2005) Decision support for integrated wetland management. Environ Modell Softw 20:215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins KM, Boulton AJ, Ryder DS (2005) A common parched future? Research and management of Australian arid-zone floodplain wetlands. Hydrobiologia 552:57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Osornio JJ, Gomez-Pompa A (1991) Human role in shaping of the flora in a wetland community, the chinampa. Landsc Urban Plan 20:47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lélé M (1991) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Dev 19(6):607–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle S, Bastianoni S et al (2004) Neotropical wetlands: new instruments in ecosystem management. Wetlands Ecol Manage 12:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle S, Rossi C et al (2001) The use of systems analysis methods in the sustainable management of wetlands. Hydrobiologia 458:191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López-Ridaura S, Masera O, Astier M (2002) Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. The MESMIS framework. Ecol Indic 2:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malca RP (1976) Polyculture systems with channel catfish as the principal species. Dissertation, Auburn University, Alabama

  • Masera O, Astier M, López-Ridaura S (1999) Sustentabilidad y Manejo de Recursos Naturales: El Marco de Evaluación MESMIS. Mundiprensa, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. A report to the Balaton Group. Sustainability Institute, Hartland Four Corners, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Moctezuma A, González C et al (2007) Multiculture of native species in irrigation ponds. Livest Res Rural Dev 19(1):15

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtahiko M, Gereta E et al (2006) Towards an ecohydrology-based restoration of the Usangu wetlands and the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania. Wetlands Ecol Manage 14(6):489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts T (2006) A framework for the analysis of sustainability indicators systems in fisheries. Ocean Coast Manage 49:259–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price T, Probert D (1997) Role of constructed wetlands in environmentally-sustainable developments. Appl Energy 57:129–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez F (1999) Conservation, management, and sustainable utilization of wildlife. In: Avila S, Colín S, Muñoz C (comps). Economics of biodiversity. Compilation of the International Seminar on La Paz, BCS. SEMARNAP, Mexico pp 341–357

  • Roggeri H (1995) Tropical freshwater wetlands. A guide to current knowledge and sustainable management. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosas M (1976) Explotación piscícola en charcos temporales y permanentes en Michoacán. INP/S1:i66:38. Instituto Nacional de Pesca, México

  • SPP (1981) Síntesis Geográfica del Estado de México. Secretaría de Programación y Presupuesto, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura Y (1998) La caza, la pesca y la recolección: Etnoarqueología del modo de subsistencia lacustre en las ciénegas del Alto Lerma. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiesing MA (2001) An evaluation of wetland assessment techniques and their applications to decision making. In: Finlayson CM, Davidson NC, Stevenson NJ (eds) Wetland inventory, assessment and monitoring: Practical techniques and identification of major issues. Proceedings of workshop 4, 2nd international conference on wetlands and development, Dakar, Senegal. Supervising Scientist Report 161. Darwin, Australia. Available from http://www.environment.gov.au/ssd/publications/ssr/pubs/techniques-ssr161.pdf. Cited 8 Mar 2007

  • Toledo A (1998) Economía de la Biodiversidad. PNUMA/ORPALC, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM et al (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35:7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel JH (2002) Markets or metaphors? A sustainable livelihoods approach to environmental services: two cases from Ecuador. IIED, London and Ecodecision, Quito

  • Von Wirén-Lehr S (2001) Sustainability in agriculture: an evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap between theory and practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo M, Young KL (2006) High Arctic wetlands: their occurrence, hydrological characteristics and sustainability. J Hydrol 320:432–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalidis GC, Gerakis A (1999) Evaluating sustainability of watershed resources management through wetland functional analysis. Environ Manage 24:193–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zalidis G, Takavakoglou V et al (2004). Re-establishing a sustainable wetland at former Lake Karla, Greece, using Ramsar restoration guidelines. Environ Manage 34:875–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This case study was carried out with the support of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico (UAEM) and the National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT). The active participation of local farmers and their families is gratefully acknowledged, as well as the useful suggestions of two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. González-Esquivel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moctezuma-Malagón, A., González-Esquivel, C.E., De la Lanza-Espino, G. et al. A methodology for evaluating the sustainability of inland wetland systems. Aquacult Int 16, 525–537 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9163-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-007-9163-5

Keywords

Navigation