Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of chk1 and plk1 silencing on radiation- or cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in human malignant cells

  • Report
  • Published:
Apoptosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The G2/M checkpoint is an attractive pathway for targeting and sensitizing tumor cells to cancer treatment. Abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint by targeting molecules, such as checkpoint kinase 1 (chk1), increases DNA breakage and sensitizes tumor cells to anti-tumoral agents. However, most of the previously described G2/M abrogators are actually targeting the G2-M border checkpoints rather than mitotic checkpoints. This prompted us to test the effects of combined targeting of chk1 and a critical regulator of mitosis, polo-like kinase 1 (plk1). Chk1 and plk1 were found to be co-expressed in 70% of primary neoplastic tissues we examined. Asynchronized tumor cells were treated with different DNA damaging-agents to activate G1/S, S or G2/M checkpoints. Either chk1 or plk1-specific antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ASODN) enhanced DNA damaging agent-induced apoptosis. When used in combination, however, chk1- plus plk1-specific ASODN failed to produce synergistic effects. Moreover, selective targeting of plk1 or chk1 in tumor xenografts of mice by oncolytic adenovirus mutants demonstrated potent anti-tumoral efficacy in the presence of low dose cisplatin. Again, combined targeting of chk1 and plk1 did not further enhance anti-tumoral efficacy. We concluded that combined targeting of chk1 and plk1 was not superior to either targeting chk1 or plk1 alone, which suggested that chk1 and plk1 silencing might overlap in their mechanism of action. Whether combined targeting of chk1 with other, more specific mitotic regulators would synergistically sensitize tumor to anti-neoplastic therapeutics needs to be further clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorensen CS, Hansen LT, Dziegielewski J et al (2005) The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat Cell Biol 7:195–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong CF, Guminski A, Saunders NA, Burgess AJ (2005) Exploiting novel cell cycle targets in the development of anticancer agents. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 5:85–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou BB, Bartek J (2004) Targeting the checkpoint kinases: chemosensitization versus chemoprotection. Nat Rev Cancer 4:216–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu Q, La RJ, Zhang H et al (2002) UCN-01 inhibits p53 up-regulation and abrogates gamma-radiation-induced G2-M checkpoint independently of p53 by targeting both of the checkpoint kinases, chk2 and chk1. Canc Res 62:5743–5748

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kortmansky J, Shah MA, Kaubisch A et al (2005) Phase I trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and protein kinase C inhibitor 7-hydroxystaurosporine in combination with Fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 23:1875–1884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blagden S, de Bono J (2005) Drugging cell cycle kinases in cancer therapy. Curr Drug Targets 6:325–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dai W, Cogswell JP (2003) Polo-like kinases and the microtubule organization center: targets for cancer therapies. Prog Cell Cycle Res 5:327–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Vugt MA, Bras A, Medema RH (2004) Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery from a G2 DNA damage-induced arrest in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 15:799–811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reagan-Shaw S, Ahmad N (2005) Silencing of polo-like kinase (Plk) 1 via siRNA causes induction of apoptosis and impairment of mitosis machinery in human prostate cancer cells: implications for the treatment of prostate cancer. Faseb J 19:611–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gumireddy K, Reddy M, Cosenza S et al (2005) ON01910, a non-ATP-competitive small molecule inhibitor of Plk1, is a potent anticancer agent. Cancer Cell 7:275–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou J, Gao Q, Chen G et al (2005) Novel oncolytic adenovirus selectively targets tumor-associated polo-like kinase 1 and tumor cell viability. Clin Cancer Res 11:8431–8440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao Q, Zhou J, Huang X, Fei Y, Lu Y (2006) Selective targeting of checkpoint kinase 1 in tumor cells with a novel potent oncolytic adenovirus. Molecular Therapy in press

  13. Kawabe T (2004) G2 checkpoint abrogators as anticancer drugs. Molecul Cancer Therap 3:513–519

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson H, Andersen R, Roberge M (2003) Inhibitors of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint and their potential for cancer therapy. Progr Cell Cycle Res 5:423–430

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi Z, Azuma A, Sampath D et al (2001) S-Phase arrest by nucleoside analogues and abrogation of survival without cell cycle progression by 7-hydroxystaurosporine. Canc Res 61:1065–1072

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ito Y, Nakamura Y, Yoshida H et al (2005) Polo-like kinase 1 expression in medullary carcinoma of the thyroid: its relationship with clinicopathological features. Pathobiology 72:186–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weichert W, Schmidt M, Jacob J et al (2005) Overexpression of Polo-like kinase 1 is a common and early event in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 55:259–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Vugt MA, Medema RH (2005) Getting in and out of mitosis with Polo-like kinase-1. Oncogene 24:2844–2859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weaver B, Cleveland D (2005) Decoding the links between mitosis, cancer, and chemotherapy: the mitotic checkpoint, adaptation, and cell death. Cancer Cell 8:7–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kops GJ, Weaver BA, Cleveland DW (2005) On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat Rev Cancer 5:773–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao Z, Xue J, Semizarov D et al (2005) Novel indication for cancer therapy: Chk1 inhibition sensitizes tumor cells to antimitotics. Int J Cancer 115:528–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheung HW, Jin DY, Ling MT et al (2005) Mitotic arrest deficient 2 expression induces chemosensitization to a DNA-damaging agent, cisplatin, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 65:1450-1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dowling M, Voong KR, Kim M et al (2005) Mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation by trichostatin a defines a mechanism for increasing cancer cell killing by microtubule-disrupting agents. Cancer Biol Ther 4:197–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lara PN Jr, Mack PC, Synold T et al (2005) The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor UCN-01 plus cisplatin in advanced solid tumors: a California cancer consortium phase I pharmacokinetic and molecular correlative trial. Clin Cancer Res 11:4444–4450.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meng L, Zhou J, Seradr E, Bulun (2001) TNF alpha and IL-11 secreted by malignant breast epithelial cells inhibit adipocytes differentiation by selectively downregulating C/EBP alpha and PPAR gammar: mechanism of desmoplastic reaction. Cancer Res 61:2250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou J, Gurates B, Yang S, Sebastian S, Bulun SE (2001) Malignant breast epithelial cells stimulate aromatase expression via promoter II in human adipose fibroblasts: an epithelial-stromal interaction in breast tumors mediated by CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta. Cancer Res 61:2328–2334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu G, Arregui C, Lilien J (2002) PTP1B modulates the association of beta-catenin with N-cadherin through binding to an adjacent and partially overlapping target site. J Biol Chem 277:49989–49997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lane HA, Nigg EA (1996) Antibody microinjection reveals an essential role for human polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) in the functional maturation of mitotic centrosomes. J Cell Biol 135:1701–1713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tao D, Wu J, Feng Y et al (2004) New method for the analysis of cell cycle-specific apoptosis. Cytometry A 57:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Heise C, Hermiston T, Johnson L et al (2000) An adenovirus E1A mutant that demonstrates potent and selective systemic anti-tumoral efficacy. Nat Med 6:1134–1139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfeng Zhou.

Additional information

Qinglei Gao and Xiaoyuan Huang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, Q., Huang, X., Tang, D. et al. Influence of chk1 and plk1 silencing on radiation- or cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in human malignant cells. Apoptosis 11, 1789–1800 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-9421-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-9421-4

Keywords

Navigation