Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative reproduction of Varroa destructor in different types of Russian and Italian honey bee combs

  • Published:
Experimental and Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earlier studies showed that Russian honey bees support slow growth of varroa mite population. We studied whether or not comb type influenced varroa reproduction in both Russian and Italian honey bees, and whether Russian bees produced comb which inhibited varroa reproduction. The major differences found in this study concerned honey bee type. Overall, the Russian honey bees had lower (2.44 ± 0.18%) levels of varroa infestation than Italian honey bees (7.20 ± 0.60%). This decreased infestation resulted in part from a reduced number of viable female offspring per foundress in the Russian (0.85 ± 0.04 female) compared to the Italian (1.23 ± 0.04 females) honey bee colonies. In addition, there was an effect by the comb built by the Russian honey bee colonies that reduced varroa reproduction. When comparing combs having Russian or Italian colony origins, Russian honey bee colonies had more non-reproducing foundress mites and fewer viable female offspring in Russian honey bee comb. This difference did not occur in Italian colonies. The age of comb in this study had mixed effects. Older comb produced similar responses for six of the seven varroa infestation parameters measured. In colonies of Italian honey bees, the older comb (2001 dark) had fewer (1.13 ± 0.07 females) viable female offspring per foundress than were found in the 2002 new (1.21 ± 0.06 females) and 1980s new (1.36 ± 0.08 females) combs. This difference did not occur with Russian honey bee colonies where the number of viable female offspring was low in all three types of combs. This study suggests that honey bee type largely influences growth of varroa mite population in a colony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baxter JR, Eischen F, Pettis J, Wilson WT, Shimanuki H (1998) Detection of fluvalinate-resistant Varroa mites in the United States. Am Bee J 138:291

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanov S, Kilchenmann V, Imdorf A (1998) Acaricide residues in some bee products. J Apic Res 37:57–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Guzman LI, Rinderer TE, Frake AM (2007) Growth of Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Acari: Varroidae) populations in Russian honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies. Ann Entomol Soc Am 100:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donzé GS, Guerin PM (1994) Behavioral attributes and parental care of Varroa mites parasitizing honey bee brood. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:305–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Donzé GS, Schnyder-Candrian S, Bogdanov S, Diehl PA, Guerin PM (1998) Aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes of the honey bee cocoon induce arrestment behavior in Varroa jacobsoni (Acari: Mesostigmata), an ectoparasite of Apis mellifera. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 37:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzen PJ, Westervelt D (2002) Detection of coumaphos resistance in Varroa destructor in Florida. Am Bee J 142:291–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzen PJ, Baxter JR, Spivak M, Wilson WT (1999) Amitraz resistance in Varroa: a new discovery in North America. Am Bee J 139:362

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries I, Wallner K, Rosenkranz P (1998) Effects on Varroa jacobsoni from acaricides in beeswax. J Apic Res 37:85–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harbo JR, Harris JW (2001) The relationship between nonreproduction of varroa and the quantity of worker brood. Am Bee J 141:889–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbo JR, Harris JW (2005) Suppressed mite reproduction explained by the behaviour of adult bees. J Apic Res 44:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbo J, Hoopingarner RA (1997) Honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the United States that express resistance to Varroa jacobsoni. J Econ Entomol 90:893–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn HR, Kurstjens SP (1988) The combs of honey bees as composite materials. Apidologie 19:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez JJ, Bernal JL, del Nozal MJ, Martín MT (2005) Residues of organic contaminants in beeswax. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 107:896–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochansky J, Wilzer K, Feldlaufer M (2001) Comparison of the transfer of coumaphos from beeswax into syrup and honey. Apidologie 32:119–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus B, Page RE Jr (1995) Population growth of Varroa jacobsoni Oud in Mediterranean climates of California. Apidologie 26:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leníček J, Sekyra M, Novotná AR, Vášová E, Titěra D, Veselý V (2006) Solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography with ion trap detector (GC-ITD) analysis of amitraz residues in beeswax after hydrolysis to 2,4-dimethylaniline. Anal Chim Acta 571:40–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lodesani M, Pellacani A, Bergomi S, Carpana E, Rabitti T, Lasagni P (1992) Residue determination for some products used against Varroa infestations in bees. Apidologie 23:257–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lodesani M, Costa C, Bigliardi M, Colombo R (2003) Acaricide residues in bee wax and organic beekeeping. Apiacta 38:31–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Martel A, Zeggane S (2002) Determination of acaricides in honey by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection. J Chromatogr 954:173–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Message D, Goncalves LS (1995) Effect of the size of worker brood cells of Africanized honey bees on infestation and reproduction of the ectoparasitic mite Varroa jacobsoni Oud. Apidologie 26:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazzi F, Milani N, Vedova GD, Nimis M (2001) Semiochemicals from larval food affect the locomotory behaviour of Varroa destructor. Apidologie 32:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piccirillo GA, de Jong D (2004) Old honey bee brood combs are more infested by the mite Varroa destructor than are new brood combs. Apidologie 35:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinderer TE, Baxter J (1978) Effect of empty comb on hoarding behavior and honey production of the honey bee. J Econ Entomol 71:757–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinderer TE, de Guzman LI, Harris J, Kuznetsov V, Delatte GT, Stelzer JA, Beaman L (2000) The release of ARS Russian honey bees. Am Bee J 140:305–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinderer TE, de Guzman LI, Delatte GT, Stelzer JA, Kuznetsov V, Beaman L, Watts R, Harris J (2001) Resistance to the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in honey bees from Far-eastern Russia. Apidologie 32:381–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (2001) SAS user’s guide, version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Gary Delatte, Lorraine Beaman, Tony Stelzer and Ahline Angeles for their technical help. Charlie Harper of Harper’s apiaries provided wax foundations from the early 1980s. This research was completed in cooperation with the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilia I. de Guzman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Guzman, L.I., Rinderer, T.E. & Frake, A.M. Comparative reproduction of Varroa destructor in different types of Russian and Italian honey bee combs. Exp Appl Acarol 44, 227–238 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9142-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9142-1

Keywords

Navigation