Skip to main content
Log in

Diurnal and spatial patterns of Phytoseiidae in the citrus canopy

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Phytoseiid mites were sampled in a grapefruit orchard at various times of the day to study their diurnal and seasonal distributions in the tree canopy. Samples were collected on 14, 20 and 28 October 1999 at 2 h intervals from 0600 to 2200 h. Similar samples were collected in a grapefruit orchard at 3 h intervals from 0600 to 2100 h on 9 and 16 March and on 17 and 24 August 2000 for phytoseiid mites. No differences in numbers of phytoseiid motiles were observed among the hours sampled in any of the three months. However, significant differences were observed in the number of phytoseiids per leaf based on location within the tree (eastern, western sides of the canopy or interior). Interior leaves collected in March and August 2000 had higher numbers of phytoseiids than exterior leaves taken from either the eastern or western sides of the tree canopy. Phytoseiids were more abundant in the March 2000 samples (mean = 1.10 phytoseiids/leaf) than in either October 1999 or August 2000 samples (mean = 0.16 and 0.19 phytoseiids/leaf, respectively). Prevalent phytoseiid species were Typhlodromalus peregrinus (Muma) (42.1%) and Iphiseiodes quadripilis (Banks) (50.4%) in October 1999, Typhlodromalus peregrinus (Muma) (76.2%) in March 2000, and Euseius mesembrinus (Dean) (54%) in August 2000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.M. Abou-Setta C.C. Childers (1987) ArticleTitleBiology of Euseius mesembrinus (Acari: Phytoseiidae): life tables on ice plant pollen at different temperatures with notes on behaviour and food range Exp. Appl. Acarol. 3 123–130

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.C. Allen C.W. McCoy (1979) ArticleTitleThe thermal environment of the citrus rust mite Agric. Meteorol. 20 411–425

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.C. Allen J.P. Syvertsen (1981) ArticleTitleThe world of the citrus rust mite: a microclimate prediction problem Proc. IX Int. Congr. Plant Prot. 1 138–140

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.A. Chant (1985) Sytematics and Morphology W. Helle M.W. Sabelis (Eds) Spider Mites, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 1B Elsevier Amsterdam 103–129

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.C. Childers (1994) Biological control of phytophagous mites on Florida citrus utilizing predatory arthropods D. Rosen F.D. Bennet J.L. Capinera (Eds) Pest Management in the Subtropics Intercept Andover U.K 255–288

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.C. Childers H. Aguilar R.T. Villanueva M.M. Abou Setta (2001) ArticleTitleComparative toxicities of pesticides to the predator Euseius mesembrinus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on citrus in Florida Fla. Entomol. 84 391–401

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.N. Ferro R.B. Chapman R. Penman (1979) ArticleTitleObservations on insect microclimate and insect pest management Environ. Entomol. 8 1000–1003

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.S. Fraenkel D.L. Gunn (1961) The orientation of animals kineses, taxas and compass reactions Dover Publ. Dover 376

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Garcia-Mari R. Laborda J. Costa-Comelles F. Ferragut C. Marzal (1985) ArticleTitleAcaros fitofagos y depredadores en nuestros citricos Cuadernos de Fitopatologia 2 54–63

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.M. Gates (1968) ArticleTitleTranspiration and leaf temperature Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 19 211–238

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.W. Krantz (1978) A manual of acarology. 2nd ed Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Inc. Corvallis, Oregon 509

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.A. Martin T.M. Hinckley F.C. Meinzer D.G. Sprugel (1999) ArticleTitleBoundary layer conductanceleaf temperature and transpiration of Abies amabilis branches Tree Physiol. 19 435–443

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.H. Muma (1964) ArticleTitleThe population of Phytoseiidae on Florida citrus Florida Entomol. 47 5–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muma M.H. 1967. Typhlodromalus peregrinus (Muma) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on Florida citrus. Proc. 2nd Int. Congr. Acarol. Budapest Publishing House of the Hungarian Acad. Sci. AkademiaKiadopp. 135–148.

  15. M.H. Muma (1975) Mites associated with citrus in Florida Agric. Exp. Sta IFAS, Univ. Florida Gainesville. Bull. 640A. 92

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.M. Muma H.A. Denmark (1971) Phytoseiidae of Florida. Arthropods of Florida and neighboring land areas. Vol. 6 Florida Dept. Agric. Cons. Serv. Florida 150

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.M. Muma A.G. Selhime (1971) ArticleTitleAgistemus floridanus (Acarina: Stigmaeidae) a predatory mite on Florida citrus Fla. Entomol. 54 249–258

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.P. Norton G. English-Loeb E. Belden (2001) ArticleTitleHost plant manipulation of natural enemies: leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators Oecologia 126 535–542

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.J. O’ Dowd M.F. Willson (1997) ArticleTitleLeaf domatia and the distribution and abundance of foliar mites in broadleaf deciduous forest in Wisconsin Am. Midl. Nat. 137 337–348

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Onzo R. Hanna I. Zannou M.W. Sabelis J.S. Yaninek (2003) ArticleTitleDynamics of refuge use: diurnal, vertical migration by predatory and herbivorous mites within cassava plants Oikos. 101 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Pena (1992) ArticleTitlePredator-prey interactions between Typhlodromalus peregrinusPolyphagotarsonemus latus: effects of alternative prey and other food resources Fla. Entomol. 75 241–248

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Pena R.M. Baranowski H.A Denmark (1989) ArticleTitleSurvey of predators of the broad mite in Southern Florida Fla. Entomol. 72 373–377

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Roda J. Nyrop M. Dicke G. English-Loeb (2000) ArticleTitleTrichomes and spider-mite webbing protect predatory mite eggs from intraguild predation Oecologia 125 428–435

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.W. Sabelis (1985) Predation on spider mites W. Helle M.W. Sabelis (Eds) Spider Mites, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 1B Elsevier Amsterdam 103–129

    Google Scholar 

  25. InstitutionalAuthorNameStatsoftInc. (2000) Statistica for Windows Tulsa OklahomaUSA

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.T. Villanueva (2002) A study of the biology and ecology of selected predators of phytophagous mites on Florida citrus Doctoral dissertation Univ. Florida Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  27. D.E. Walter (1996) ArticleTitleLiving on leaves: mites, tomentaand leaf domatia Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  28. T.A. Wheaton W.S. Castle D.P.H. Tucker J.D. Whitney (1978) ArticleTitleHigher density plantings for Florida citrus Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 91 36–40

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.C. Childers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villanueva, R., Childers, C. Diurnal and spatial patterns of Phytoseiidae in the citrus canopy. Exp Appl Acarol 35, 269–280 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-004-5728-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-004-5728-4

Keywords

Navigation