Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An improved belief Hellinger divergence for Dempster-Shafer theory and its application in multi-source information fusion

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dempster-Shafer theory (DST), as a generalization of Bayesian probability theory, is a useful technique for achieving multi-source information fusion under uncertain environments. Nevertheless, when a high degree of conflict exists between pieces of evidence, unreasonable results are often generated using Dempster’s combination rule. How to fuse highly conflicting information is still an open problem. In this study, we first propose an improved belief Hellinger divergence measure, which can fully consider the uncertainty in basic probability assignments, to quantify the conflict level between evidence. Second, some properties (i.e., nonnegativity, nondegeneracy, symmetry, and trigonometric inequality) of the proposed divergence measure are discussed. Then, we present a novel multi-source information fusion strategy, in which the credibility of the evidence is determined based on external discrepancy and internal ambiguity. Additionally, we consider the decay of credibility when fusing evidence across different times. Finally, applications in fault diagnosis and Iris dataset classification are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. The results indicate that our approach is more reasonable and can identify the target with a higher belief degree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Lin M, Li X, Chen R, Fujita H, Lin J (2022) Picture fuzzy interactional partitioned heronian mean aggregation operators: an application to madm process. Artif Intell Rev 55:1171–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang X, Chen Y, Fujita H, Liu D, Li T (2022) Mixed data-driven sequential three-way decision via subjective-objective dynamic fusion. Knowl-Based Syst 237:107728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hua Z, Xue H (2022) A maximum consensus improvement method for group decision making under social network with probabilistic linguistic information. Neural Process Lett 54:437–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao C, Chang X, Xie T, Fujita H, Wu J Unsupervised anomaly detection based method of risk evaluation for road traffic accident. Appl Intell

  5. Deng Y (2022) Random permutation set. Int J Comput Commun Control 17(1):4542

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan Y, Ma T, Xiao F (2021) An improved approach to generate generalized basic probability assignment based on fuzzy sets in the open world and its application in multi-source information fusion. Appl Intell 51:3718–3735

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yan Z, Zhao H, Mei X (2022) An improved conflicting-evidence combination method based on the redistribution of the basic probability assignment. Appl Intell 52:4674–4700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Song X, Xiao F Combining time-series evidence: A complex network model based on a visibility graph and belief entropy. Appl Intell

  9. Jing M, Tang Y (2021) A new base basic probability assignment approach for conflict data fusion in the evidence theory. Appl Intell 51:1056–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu C, Qin B, Xiao F, Cao Z, Pandey HM (2021) A fuzzy preference-based dempster-shafer evidence theory for decision fusion. Inf Sci 570:306–322

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H, Deng X, Jiang W, Geng J (2021) A new belief divergence measure for dempster-shafer theory based on belief and plausibility function and its application in multi-source data fusion. Eng Appl Artif Intell 97:104030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao F (2021) A distance measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to pattern classification problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern : Syst 51(6):3980–3992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu R, Fei L, Mi J (2022) An evidential multimoora approach to assessing disaster risk reduction education strategies under a heterogeneous linguistic environment. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 78:103114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma X, Fei Q, Qin H, Li H, Chen W (2021) A new efficient decision making algorithm based on interval-valued fuzzy soft set. Appl Intell 51:3226–3240

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deng X, Jiang W (2019) D number theory based game-theoretic framework in adversarial decision making under a fuzzy environment. Int J Approx Reason 106:194–213

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Seiti H, Hafezalkotob A, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) A novel linguistic approach for multi-granular information fusion and decision-making using risk-based linguistic d numbers. Inf Sci 530:43–65

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. collab=B.Xu, Y.Deng (2022) Information volume of z-number. Inf Sci 608:1617–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tian Y, Mi X, Cui H, Zhang P, Kang B (2021) Using z-number to measure the reliability of new information fusion method and its application in pattern recognition. Appl Soft Comput 111:107658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diao H, Lu Y, Deng A, Zou L, Li X, Pedrycz W (2022) Convolutional rule inference network based on belief rule-based system using an evidential reasoning approach. Knowl-Based Syst 237:107713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao H, Fang R, Yang J-B, Xu D-L (2022) A linguistic belief-based evidential reasoning approach and its application in aiding lung cancer diagnosis. Knowl-Based Syst, pp 109559

  21. Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38(2):325–339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Fei L, Wang Y (2022) Demand prediction of emergency materials using case-based reasoning extended by the dempster-shafer theory. Socio Econ Plan Sci, pp 101386

  24. Song Y, Deng Y Entropic explanation of power set. Int J Comput Commun Control 16

  25. Hua Z, Fei L, Xue H (2022) Consensus reaching with dynamic expert credibility under dempster-shafer theory. Inf Sci 610:847–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fei L, Feng Y, Wang H (2021) Modeling heterogeneous multi-attribute emergency decision-making with dempster-shafer theory, vol 161

  27. Huang F, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Deng X A novel conflict management method based on uncertainty of evidence and reinforcement learning for multi-sensor information fusion. Entropy 23(9):1222

  28. Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures. Comput Intell 4(3):244–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Florea MC, Jousselme A-L, Bossé E, Grenier D (2009) Robust combination rules for evidence theory. Information Fusion 10(2):183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao K, Li L, Chen Z, Sun R, Yuan G, Li J (2022) A survey: Optimization and applications of evidence fusion algorithm based on dempster-shafer theory. Appl Soft Comput 124:109075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiong L, Su X, Qian H (2021) Conflicting evidence combination from the perspective of networks. Inf Sci 580:408–418

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Grzyb J, Klikowski J, Woźniak M (2021) Hellinger distance weighted ensemble for imbalanced data stream classification. J Comput Sci 51:101314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yager RR (1987) On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules. Inf Sci 41 (2):93–137

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma W, Jiang Y, Luo X (2019) A flexible rule for evidential combination in dempster–shafer theory of evidence. Appl Soft Comput 85:105512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Du Y-W, Zhong J-J (2021) Generalized combination rule for evidential reasoning approach and dempster–shafer theory of evidence. Inf Sci 547:1201–1232

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Fang R, Liao H, Mardani A (2022) How to aggregate uncertain and incomplete cognitive evaluation information in lung cancer treatment plan selection? a method based on dempster-shafer theory. Inf Sci 603:222–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Murphy CK (2000) Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis Support Syst 29 (1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Deng Y, Shi W, Zhu Z, Liu Q (2004) Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence. Decis Support Syst 38(3):489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiao F (2019) Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy. Inf Fusion 46:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fei L, Feng Y (2021) A dynamic framework of multi-attribute decision making under pythagorean fuzzy environment by using dempster-shafer theory. Eng Appl Artif Intell 101:104213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu D, Wang S, Tomovic MM, Zhang C (2020) An evidence theory based model fusion method for degradation modeling and statistical analysis. Inf Sci 532:33–60

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Deng Y (2020) Uncertainty measure in evidence theory. SCIENCE CHINA Inf Sci 63(11):210201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou Q, Deng Y, Pedrycz W (2022) Information dimension of galton board. Fractals 30 (04):2250079

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Xiao F (2020) Efmcdm: Evidential fuzzy multicriteria decision making based on belief entropy. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 28(7):1477–1491

    Google Scholar 

  45. Deng J, Deng Y Maximum entropy of random permutation set, Soft Comput

  46. Hellinger E (1909) Neue begründung der theorie quadratischer formen von unendlichvielen veränderlichen. Journal Fur Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik 136:107307

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Yaghoubi V, Cheng L, Paepegem WV, Kersemans M (2022) A novel multi-classifier information fusion based on dempster-shafer theory: application to vibration-based fault detection. Struct Health Monit 21(2):596–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhu C, Xiao F (2021) A belief hellinger distance for d-s evidence theory and its application in pattern recognition. Eng Appl Artif Intell 106:104452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gao X, Pan L, Deng Y (2022) A generalized divergence of information volume and its applications. Eng Appl Artif Intell 108:104584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen Y, Tang Y Measuring the uncertainty in the original and negation of evidence using belief entropy for conflict data fusion. Entropy 23(4):402

  51. He Y, Xiao F (2022) A new base function in basic probability assignment for conflict management. Appl Intell 52:4473–4487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang Z, Xiao F An improved multi-source data fusion method based on the belief entropy and divergence measure. Entropy 21(6):611

  53. Jiang W, Wei B, Xie C, Zhou D (2016) An evidential sensor fusion method in fault diagnosis. Adv Mech Eng 8(3):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang H, Deng Y (2020) Weighted belief function of sensor data fusion in engine fault diagnosis. Soft Comput 24:2329–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pan L, Deng Y A new belief entropy to measure uncertainty of basic probability assignments based on belief function and plausibility function. Entropy 20(11):842

  56. Yan H, Deng Y (2020) An improved belief entropy in evidence theory. IEEE Access 8:57505–57516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Li J, Pan Q A new belief entropy in dempster-shafer theory based on basic probability assignment and the frame of discernment. Entropy 22(6):691

  58. Qian J, Guo X, Deng Y (2017) A novel method for combining conflicting evidences based on information entropy. Appl Intell 46:876–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cortez P, Cerdeira A, Almeida F, Matos T, Reis J (2009) Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties. Decis Support Syst 47(4):547–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Jiang W, Zhan J, Zhou D, Li X (2016) A method to determine generalized basic probability assignment in the open world. Math Probl Eng, pp 3878634

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Academy of Aerospace Systems Science and Engineering, Beijing, 100035, China

    Zhen Hua & Xiaochuan Jing

Authors
  1. Zhen Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaochuan Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Hua.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hua, Z., Jing, X. An improved belief Hellinger divergence for Dempster-Shafer theory and its application in multi-source information fusion. Appl Intell 53, 17965–17984 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04428-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04428-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation