Skip to main content
Log in

Histopathological image classification using enhanced bag-of-feature with spiral biogeography-based optimization

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An exponential growth of histopathological digital images over the Internet requires an efficient method for organizing them properly for better retrieval and analysis process. For the same, an automatic histopathological image classification system can be useful. Moreover, such classification system may also be used to identify the inflamed and healthy tissues from tissue image datasets. However, complex background structures and heterogeneity among histopathological tissue images make it a complicated process. Therefore, this paper introduces an innovative method for categorization of histopathological images using an enhanced bag-of-feature framework. To obtain the optimal visual words in bag-of-features, a new spiral biogeography-based optimization algorithm has been proposed which introduces a spiral search and random search in the mutation operator to generate the suitability index variables. The efficacy of the spiral biogeography-based optimization algorithm has been tested on CEC 2017 benchmarks problems. Moreover, the applicability of the proposed classification method has been observed on two histopathological image datasets, Blue Histology image dataset and ADL Histopathological image dataset. The efficacy of the spiral biogeography-based optimization algorithm based bag-of-features method has been analyzed and compared with other state-of-the-art methods with respect to average accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-measure parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gurcan MN, Boucheron LE, Can A, Madabhushi A, Rajpoot NM, Yener B (2009) Histopathological image analysis: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2:147–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saraswat M, Arya KV (2014) Automated microscopic image analysis for leukocytes identification: a survey. Micron 65:20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blue Histology, 2017 http://www.lab.anhb.uwa.edu.au/mb140/

  4. Gutiérrez R, Rueda A, Romero E (2013) Learning semantic histopathological representation for basal cell carcinoma classification. In: Proceedings of medical imaging: digital pathology, vol 8676, pp 86760U–1

  5. Vu TH, Mousavi HS, Monga V, Rao G, Rao UKA (2016) Histopathological image classification using discriminative feature-oriented dictionary learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(3):738–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jun X, Luo X, Wang G, Gilmore H, Madabhushi A (2016) A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images. Neurocomputing 191:214–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalal N, Triggs B (2005) Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005, vol 1. IEEE, pp 886–893

  8. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Harwood D (1996) A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. Pattern Recognit 29(1):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mittal H, Saraswat M (2017) Classification of histopathological images through bag-of-visual-words and gravitational search algorithm. In: International conference soft computing for problem solving

  11. Caicedo JC, Cruz A, Gonzalez FA (2009) Histopathology image classification using bag of features and kernel functions. In: Proceedings of conference on artificial intelligence in medicine in Europe. Springer, pp 126–135

  12. Bong CW, Rajeswari M (2012) Multiobjective clustering with metaheuristic: current trends and methods in image segmentation. IET Image Process 6(1):1–10

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Simon D (2008) Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(6):702–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma H, Simon D, Siarry P, Yang Z, Fei M (2017) Biogeography-based optimization: a 10-year review. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell 1(5):391–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu G, Mallipeddi R, Suganthan PN (2016) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the cec 2017 competition on constrained real-parameter optimization. National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan, PR China and Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Technical Report

  16. Mohamed AW, Hadi AA, Fattouh AM, Jambi KM (2017) LSHADE with semi-parameter adaptation hybrid with CMA-ES for solving CEC 2017 benchmark problems. In: Proceedings of IEEE congress on evolutionary computation

  17. Niu Q, Zhang L, Li K (2014) A biogeography-based optimization algorithm with mutation strategies for model parameter estimation of solar and fuel cells. Energy Convers Manag 86:1173–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garg V, Deep K (2016) Performance of laplacian biogeography-based optimization algorithm on CEC 2014 continuous optimization benchmarks and camera calibration problem. Swarm Evol Comput 27:132–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pal R, Saraswat M (2017) Data clustering using enhanced biogeography-based optimization. In: Proceedings of international conference on contemporary computing

  20. Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mittal H, Pal R, Kulhari A, Saraswat M (2016) Chaotic kbest gravitational search algorithm (ckgsa). In: Proceedings of international conference on contemporary computing. IEEE, pp 1–6

  23. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Srinivas U, Mousavi HS, Monga V, Hattel A, Jayarao B (2014) Simultaneous sparsity model for histopathological image representation and classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33(5):1163–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Feng Z (2012) Data clustering using genetic algorithms. Evolutionary computation: project report, CSE484

  26. Dimitrovski I, Kocev D, Loskovska S, Džeroski S (2011) Hierarchical annotation of medical images. Pattern Recognit 44(10–11):2436–2449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cruz-Roa A, Díaz G, Romero E, González FA (2011) Automatic annotation of histopathological images using a latent topic model based on non-negative matrix factorization. J Pathol Inf 2:1–10

  28. Díaz G, Romero E (2010) Histopathological image classification using stain component features on a plsa model. In: Proceedings of Iberoamerican congress on pattern recognition. Springer, pp 55–62

  29. Zhang R, Shen J, Wei F, Li X, Sangaiah AK (2017) Medical image classification based on multi-scale non-negative sparse coding. Artif Intell Med 83:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kingsland S (2002) The theory of island biogeography. J Hist Biol 35(1):178–179

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pal R, Saraswat M (2017) Improved biogeography-based optimization. Int J Adv Intell Paradigms, (In Press)

  32. Du D, Simon D, Ergezer M (2009) Biogeography-based optimization combined with evolutionary strategy and immigration refusal. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, pp 997–1002

  33. Gong W, Cai Z, Ling CX, Li H (2010) A real-coded biogeography-based optimization with mutation. Appl Math Comput 216(9):2749–2758

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma H, Simon D (2011) Blended biogeography-based optimization for constrained optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(3):517–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lohokare MR, Pattnaik SS, Panigrahi BK, Das S (2013) Accelerated biogeography-based optimization with neighborhood search for optimization. Appl Soft Comput 13(5):2318–2342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gong W, Cai Z, Ling CX (2010b) De/bbo: a hybrid differential evolution with biogeography-based optimization for global numerical optimization. Soft Comput 15(4):645–665

  37. Lim WL, Wibowo A, Desa MI, Haron H (2016) A biogeography-based optimization algorithm hybridized with tabu search for the quadratic assignment problem. Comput Intell Neurosci 2016:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ma H (2010) An analysis of the equilibrium of migration models for biogeography-based optimization. Inf Sci 180(18):3444–3464

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Pakhira MK, Bandyopadhyay S, Maulik U (2004) Validity index for crisp and fuzzy clusters. Pattern Recognit 37(3):487–501

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Mahoney MS (1994) The mathematical career of Pierre de Fermat, 1601–1665. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Awad NH, Ali MZ, Liang JJ, Qu BY, Suganthan PN Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the cec 2017 special session and competition on single objective bound constrained real-parameter numerical optimization. Technical Report. NTU, Singapore

  42. Theodorsson-Norheim E (1987) Friedman and quade tests: basic computer program to perform nonparametric two-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons on ranks of several related samples. J Comput Biol Med 17 (2):85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Aha DW, Kibler D, Albert MK (1991) Instance-based learning algorithms. Mach Learn 6(1):37–66

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lin We-C, Tsai C-F, Chen Z-Y, Ke S-W (2016) Keypoint selection for efficient bag-of-words feature generation and effective image classification. Inf Sci 329:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Monga V (2018) Adl data set. http://signal.ee.psu.edu/histimg2.html

  46. Chapelle O, Haffner P, Vapnik VN (1999) Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10(5):1055–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wright J, Yang AY, Ganesh A, Sastry SS, Ma Y (2009) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(2):210–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen Y, Nasrabadi NM, Tran TD (2011) Hyperspectral image classification using dictionary-based sparse representation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 49(10):3973–3985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Orlov N, Shamir L, Macura T, Johnston J, Eckley DM, Goldberg IG (2008) Wnd-charm: multi-purpose image classification using compound image transforms. Pattern Recognit Lett 29(11):1684–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang G-G, Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2014) An effective krill herd algorithm with migration operator in biogeography-based optimization. Appl Math Modell 38(9-10):2454–2462

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science & Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, India for funding this work as part of the project (ECR/2016/000844).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raju Pal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pal, R., Saraswat, M. Histopathological image classification using enhanced bag-of-feature with spiral biogeography-based optimization. Appl Intell 49, 3406–3424 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01460-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01460-1

Keywords

Navigation