Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An optimization method for task assignment for industrial manufacturing organizations

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An industrial manufacturing organization is an aggregation of collaborative units and employees during the process of product development and production. The rapid growing degree of product complexity has resulted in a rising scale of corresponding manufacturing organizations. An effective and optimal schema is essential for assigning human resources to tasks to save costs. This paper proposes an optimization method for this task assignment issue based on a dynamic industrial manufacturing process model and an improved quantum genetic algorithm (QGA) with heuristic information: the heuristic QGA (HQGA). The dynamic process model adopts a hierarchical network to illustrate task composition in a complex industrial manufacturing process and dynamically describes the task completing process on the basis of individual performance and cooperative performance. To reduce the complexity of the fitness evaluation and assignment optimization in the model, the HQGA is presented for three types of optimization objective functions. The HQGA introduces a heuristic principle to accelerate convergence toward an optimal solution, where quantum bitbased encoding design can reflect the degree of participation of different individuals for different tasks. In four case studies, the HQGA successfully completed task assignment based on our dynamic process model and showed better optimization performance compared with conventional QGA and GA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh AH, Afshari H, Khorshiddoust RR (2014) Integration of process planning and production planning and control in cellular manufacturing [J]. Prod Plan Control 25(10):840–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwindt C (2005) Resource allocation in project management [M]. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cabanillas C, García J M, Resinas M et al (2013) Priority-based human resource allocation in business processes [M]. Service-oriented computing. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta ND (2002) An excursion in scheduling theory: an overview of scheduling research in the twentieth century [J]. Prod Plan Control 13(2):105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caniato F, Al E (2015) A framework for studying practical production scheduling [J]. Prod Plan Control 26(6):438– 450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruhul S, Joarder K, Charles N (2011) Evolutionary optimization (EvOpt): A brief review and analysis [J]. Int J Comput Intell Appl 3(4):311–330

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lamont GB, Veldhuizen DAV (2007) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems [M]. Springer, US

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Deb K, Kalyanmoy D (2001) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms [M]. Wiley

  9. Zhong J, Cheng H, Zheng G (2014) A task scheduling model for the development test of complex products [J]. The 16th academic annual conference proceedings of Chinese Journal of Management Science, pp 95–100

  10. Yoshimura M, Fujimi Y, Izui K et al (2006) Decision-making support system for human resource allocation in product development projects [J]. Int J Prod Res 44(5):831–848

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dechevsky LT, Kachkovskiy IV (2008) Heuristic genetic algorithm for workforce scheduling with minimum total Worker-Location changeover [J]. Int J Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract 15(4):1371–1376

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bayrak AE, Polat F (2013) Employment of an evolutionary heuristic to solve the target allocation problem efficiently. Inf Sci 222:675–695

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Park J, Seo D, Hong G et al (2015) Human resource allocation in software project with practical considerations. Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng 25(1):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin CM, Gen M (2008) Multi-criteria human resource allocation for solving multistage combinatorial optimization problems using multiobjective hybrid genetic algorithm [J]. Expert Syst Appl 34(4):2480–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang WB, Xiao YY, Pan X (2008) Optimizing human resources allocation on equipment maintenance with predefined sequence. In: Xia G, Osaki H (eds) Icim 2008: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on industrial management , pp 464–470

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kang Q, Hong HE (2013) Task assignment for minimizing application completion time using honeybee mating optimization [J]. Front Comp Sci 7(3):404–415

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. T Al-Hawari M, Ali O et al (2014) Al-araidah development of a genetic algorithm for multi-objective assembly line balancing using multiple assignment approach [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu H, Zhang P, Hu B et al (2015) A novel approach to task assignment in a cooperative multi-agent design system [J]. Appl Intell 43(1):162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Narayanan A, Moore M (1996) Quantum-inspired genetic algorithms [C]. In: IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE, pp 61–66

  20. Han KH, Kim JH (2003) Genetic quantum algorithm and its application to combinatorial optimization problem [C], Evolutionary Computation, 2000. In: Proceedings of the 2000 congress on IEEE, vol 2, pp 1354–1360

  21. Yang JA, Zhuang ZQ, Shi L (2004) Multi-Universe parallel quantum genetic algorithm [J]. Acta Electronica Sinica 32(6): 923–928

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang L, Tang F, Wu H (2005) Hybrid genetic algorithm based on quantum computing for numerical optimization and parameter estimation [J]. Appl Math Comput 171(2):1141–1156

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Li S, Li PC (2006) Quantum genetic algorithm based on real encoding and gradient information of object function [J]. J Harbin Institute Technol 38(8):1216–1212

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kong H, Li N (2013) Heuristic quantum genetic algorithm for air combat decision making on cooperative multiple target attack [J]. Int J Model Simul Sci Comput 4(4)

  25. Li N, Li X, Yang K (2014) Human performance model based on fuzzy rules [C]. In: Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. IEEE, pp 2225–2230

  26. Li N, Kong H, Ma Y et al (2016) Human performance modeling for manufacturing based on an improved KNN algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(1):473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mo H, Gong G, Li N et al A model of organizational performance based on the big-five factor theory and ABMS method. Inter J Model Simul Sci Comput 7(2):1650001-1-1650001-10

  28. Pillai AS, Joshi A, Rao KS (2002) Performance measurement of r&d projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment [J]. Int J Proj Manag 20(2):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li S, Li PC (2009) Quantum computation and quantum optimization algorithms [M]. Haerbin Institute of Technology Press, Haerbin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanghong Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, N., Li, Y., Sun, M. et al. An optimization method for task assignment for industrial manufacturing organizations. Appl Intell 47, 1144–1156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0940-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0940-1

Keywords

Navigation