Skip to main content
Log in

A new particle swarm optimization algorithm for fuzzy optimization of armored vehicle scheme design

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Armored vehicle design is a complex constrained optimization problem which often involves a number of fuzzy and stochastic parameters. In this paper, a fuzzy optimization problem model of armored vehicle scheme design is presented, and a new particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is proposed for effectively solving the problem. The problem model uses fuzzy variables to evaluate the objective function and constraints of the problem. The algorithm employs multiple ranking criteria to define three global bests of the swarm, makes different quality particles learning from different global bests, and thus search effectively through the solution space by means of multi-criteria optimization. Experiment results show that our approach can achieve good solution quality with low computational costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Algorithm 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks, Perth WA, Australia, pp 1942–1948

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Li XD, Engelbrecht AP (2007) Particle swarm optimization: an introduction and its recent developments. In: Proceedings of 2007 genetic and evolutionary computation conference, London, England, pp 3391–3414

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang RJ, Gu L, Tho CH, Choi KK, Youn BD (2002) Reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization of a full vehicle system. In: Proceedings of 43rd AIAA SDM conference, Denver, USA, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kodiyalam S, Yang RJ, Gu L, Tho CH (2004) Multidisciplinary design optimization of a vehicle system in a scalable, high performance computing environment. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26(3–4):256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tušar T, Korošec P, Papa G, Filipič B, Šilc J (2007) A comparative study of stochastic optimization methods in electric motor design. Appl Intell 27(2):101–111

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Nosratollahi M, Mortazavi M, Adami A, Hosseini M (2010) Multidisciplinary design optimization of a reentry vehicle using genetic algorithm. Aircraft Eng Aerospace Technol 82(3):194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebrahimi M, Farmani MR, Roshanian J (2011) Multidisciplinary design of a small satellite launch vehicle using particle swarm optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. doi:10.1007/s00158-011-0662-7

  9. Fang W, Shi R (2003) Pareto genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization of aircraft conceptual design. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 29(8):668–672

    Google Scholar 

  10. Adra SF, Hamody AI, Griffin I, Fleming PJ (2005) A hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using an inverse neural network for aircraft control system design. In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 1–8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu TY, Yu XQ (2009) Aerodynamic/stealthy/structural multidisciplinary design optimization of unmanned combat air vehicle. Chin J Aeronaut 22(4):380–386

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. García-Pedrajas N, Herrera F, Fyfe C (2011) Special issue on the trends in applied intelligence systems. Appl Intell 34(3):329–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan SA, Engelbrecht AP (2012) A fuzzy particle swarm optimization algorithm for computer communication network topology design. Appl Intell 36(1):161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Norouzzadeh MS, Ahmadzadeh MR, Palhang M (2011) LADPSO: using fuzzy logic to conduct PSO algorithm. Appl Intell. doi:10.1007/s10489-011-0328-6

  15. Song B, Xu D, Zhang Y (1999) Multiobjective fuzzy weight-optimization design of under-water vehicle shell structure. J Northwestern Polytech Univ 17(2):274–279

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Gao S, Li L, Chen L, Yang J, Abdel-Malek K (2007) A fuzzy synthesis control scheme and optimization for vehicle dynamic stability system. In: Proceedings of the ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Las Vegas, NV, vol 5, pp 1959–1965

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tang C, Zhao L (2010) Fuzzy optimization of vehicle power train based on dynamic quality and fuel economy. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on mechanical and electronics engineering, Kyoto, Japan, vol 2, pp 2390–2393

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tang JF, Wang DW, Fung YK, Yung KL (2004) Understanding of fuzzy optimization: theories and methods. J Syst Sci Complex 17(1):117–136

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng CH (1998) A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets Syst 95(3):307–317

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu B, Liu YK (2002) Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(4):445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen SJ, Chen SM (2007) Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl Intell 26(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramli N, Mohamad D (2009) A comparative analysis of centroid methods in ranking fuzzy numbers. Eur J Sci Res 28(3):492–501

    Google Scholar 

  23. Inuiguchi M, Greco S, Slowinski R, Tanino T (2003) Possibility and necessity measure specification using modifiers for decision making under fuzziness. Fuzzy Sets Syst 137(1):151–175

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Prodanovic P, Simonovic SP (2003) Fuzzy compromise programming for group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part A, Syst Hum 33(1):358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu B (2007) Uncertainty theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng YJ (2010) Extended tabu search on fuzzy traveling salesman problem in multi-criteria analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on algorithmic aspects in information and management. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6124. Springer, Berlin, pp 314–324

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng YJ, Ling HF, Chen SY (2012) Fuzzy combinatorial optimization with multiple ranking criteria: a staged tabu search framework. Pacific J Optim (in press)

  28. Jiao B, Zheng YJ, Zhang ZQ (2001) Exponential regression model for operation and support cost of armored vehicle. J Armored Force Eng Inst 15(3):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ho SJ, Ku WY, Jou JW, Hung MH, Ho SY (2006) Intelligent particle swarm optimization in multi-objective problems. In: Proceedings of 10th Pacific-Asia conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 3918. Springer, Berlin, pp 790–800

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol Comput 8(2):173–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from National Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 61105073, 61020106009) of China. The authors are grateful to the data provided by Institute of Armored Forces Equipment and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Jun Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, K., Zheng, Y.J. A new particle swarm optimization algorithm for fuzzy optimization of armored vehicle scheme design. Appl Intell 37, 520–526 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0345-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-012-0345-0

Keywords

Navigation