Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Supersonic, variable-throat, blow-down wind tunnel control using genetic algorithms, neural networks, and gain scheduled PID

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the design and application of a control algorithm is discussed to control the test conditions within plenum chamber and the test section of a supersonic blow-down, variable throat wind tunnel at the University of Alabama. The artificially intelligent controller algorithm was designed using a gain scheduled Proportional-Integral-Differential (PID) control approach. The PID controller was augmented to work with time variant properties of the control problem by determining a functional form of the integral term of the controller from the governing equations of the tunnel. The controller was optimized using genetic algorithms (GA) on a neural network (NN) model of the tunnel and was compared to a conventional PID controller using the same NN model. The process was repeated for different throat settings to find the control gains for each setting. The controller algorithm was next applied to the actual wind tunnel at different throat settings and the results were compared. The optimized controller is proven to work very well at every throat setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hwang D-S, Hsu P-L (1998) A robust controller design for supersonic intermittent blow down type wind tunnels. Aeronaut J Roy Aeronaut Soc 102(1013):161–169

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang G, Chai T, Shao C (1997) A synthetic approach for control of intermittent wind tunnel. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, Albuquerque, NM, June 1997

  3. Miwa H, Sato M, Sakakibara S, Takashima K (1986) Closed-loop Mach number control and measurement. In: Fluid control and measurement; proceedings of the international symposium, Tokyo, Japan, 2–5 September 1985, pp 515–520

  4. van Zanten R, Wind tunnel control by compactRio. http://www.citengineering.com/downloads/pdf/TUDelft_Eng.pdf

  5. Matsumoto J, Lu F, Wilson D (2001) Preprogrammed controller for a supersonic wind tunnel, AIAA 2001-1056. In: 39th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 8–11 January 2001

  6. Motter M, Principe J (1997) Neural control of the NASA Langley 16-fott transonic tunnel. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, Albuquerque, NM, June 1997

  7. Ogata K (2001) Modern control engineering, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu C-J (1999) Genetic tuning of PID controllers using a neural network model: a seesaw example. J Intell Robot Syst 25:43–59

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. An E-S, Lee D-H, Jeon C-M, Kim I-H, Park C-W (2003) System identification and two DOF PID controller design for an industrial sewing machine. IECON Proc 2:1557–1563

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karr C (1999) Practical Implications of computational intelligence for adaptive control. CRC Press, Boca Raton. ISBN 0-8493-2069-0

    Google Scholar 

  12. McMichael J, Parekh D, Heiges M 2004 The application of fuzzy methods and genetic algorithms to flow control, AIAA-2004-2524. In: 2nd AIAA flow control conference, Portland, OR, 28–31 June 2001

  13. Bedwani WA, Ismail OM (2001) Genetic optimization of variable structure PID control systems AICCSA. In: ACS/IEEE international conference on computer systems and applications (AICCSA’01), p 27

  14. Saravanan N, Duyar A, Guo T-H, Merrill WC (1994) Modeling space shuttle main engine using feed-forward neural networks. J Guid Control Dyn 17(4):641–648

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosario RA, Steinle FW Jr (2002) Neural network application for optimizing multi-stage wind tunnel compressor efficiency, AIAA-2002-308. In: 40th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 14–17 January 2002

  16. Jacobs JH (ed) (2000) Active control of wind-tunnel model aeroelastic response using neural networks. In: Smart structures and materials 2000: Industrial and commercial applications of smart structures technologies, June 2000. Proceedings of SPIE, vol 3991, pp 232–243

  17. Suzuki S, Sakamoto Y, Sanematsu Y, Takahara H (2005) Analysis of human pilot maneuver using neural network combined with genetic algorithms, AIAA-2005-910. In: 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 10–13 January 2005

  18. Sejnowski T, Rossenburg C (1987) Parallel networks that learn to pronounce English text. Complex Syst 1:145–168

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Luge GF (2002) Artificial intelligence—structures and strategies for complex problem solving, 4th edn. Addison–Wesley, Reading. ISBN 0-201-64866-0

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wasserman PD (1989) Neural computing—theory and practice, Van Nostrand and Reinhold, New York, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 77

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Semih M. Ölçmen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nott, C.R., Ölçmen, S.M., Lewis, D.R. et al. Supersonic, variable-throat, blow-down wind tunnel control using genetic algorithms, neural networks, and gain scheduled PID. Appl Intell 29, 79–89 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-007-0082-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-007-0082-y

Keywords

Navigation