Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What’s in a Name? Terms Preferred by Service Recipients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a large (n = 1,827) multi-site study examining effectiveness of consumer operated service programs as an adjunct to traditional mental health services, we examined individuals’ preferred term describing their status as service recipients, and we applied logistic regression to examine whether preference varied by gender, race or diagnosis. Preferred terms were client (39%), patient (22%), consumer (16%), survivor (11%), other (11%) and ex-patient (1%), varying by site. Controlling for site, preferences did not vary by gender, race, or diagnosis. The lack of consensus suggests clinicians, researchers, program administrators, and policymakers should be sensitive to individuals’ preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Clay, S. (2005). About us: What we have in common. In S. Clay (Ed.), On our own together (pp. 3–16). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. (2004). How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist, 59, 614–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). User’s guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (research version 2.0). New York: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, L. (2005). BRIDGES in Tennessee: Building recovery of individual dreams and goals through education and support. In S. Clay (Ed.), On our own together (pp. 197–209). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C., King, R., Bassett, H., Sandland, S., & Save, G. (2001). Patient, client or consumer? A survey of preferred terms. Australasian Psychiatry, 9, 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueser, K. T., Glynn, S. M., Corrigan, P. W., & Baber, W. (1996). A survey of preferred terms for users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 47, 760–761.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sangster, Y. (2005). Advocacy Unlimited, Inc., Connecticut. In S. Clay (Ed.), On our own together (pp. 179–196). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V., Whitney, D., Kazarian, S. S., & Manchanda, R. (2000). Preferred terms for users of mental health services among service providers and recipients. Psychiatric Services, 51, 203–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy H. Covell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Covell, N.H., McCorkle, B.H., Weissman, E.M. et al. What’s in a Name? Terms Preferred by Service Recipients. Adm Policy Ment Health 34, 443–447 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0123-1

Keywords

Navigation