Skip to main content
Log in

Does Performance-Related Information Augment the Maximal Isometric Force in the Elbow Flexors?

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of different feedback conditions on the elbow flexors maximal voluntary isometric (MVIC) force were examined. In a single visit, twenty participants (10 males) were exposed to four conditions including, Visual only; (i.e., knowledge of results [VI]); Verbal encouragement (i.e., verbally stating pull, pull [VE]); VI and VE (VIVE); and no VI or VE (NOVIVE). Three, 5-s MVIC trials were completed for each condition. Separate 2 × 4 (sex × condition) repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine MVIC force, rate of force development (RFD200), and rate of electromyography (EMG) rise (RER200) for the 0–200-ms window. There was a significant main condition effect for MVIC force (p < 0.001). Significantly greater MVIC force was shown for VIVE compared to VE (p < 0.001) and NOVIVE (p = 0.002) conditions, and VI compared to VE (p = 0.011) and NOVIVE (p = 0.009) conditions. A significant sex × condition interaction (p = 0.036) was observed for RFD200, with significantly (p = 0.003) greater RFD200 in males compared to females, in the VI condition only. There were no significant differences in RFD200 among condition for males (p = 0.033) or females (p = 0.194). There was a significant main effect for sex (p = 0.006) for RER200, with significantly greater (p = 0.003) RER200 (conditions merged) in males (mean ± standard deviation (SD): 422.99 ± 124.67%), compared to females (220.68 ± 134.01%). Here we suggest the importance of providing VI feedback alone, or in conjunction with VE, for the measurement of elbow flexion MVIC. Additionally, these results provide a foundational framework for future studies aiming to improve feedback modalities during training or rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data and materials, as well as, software application support our published claims and comply with field standards.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Jason Defreitas (Oklahoma State University) for assistant in producing figures. We thank all participants who completed the study. We thank the anonymous referees for their useful suggestions.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WMM, SJ, MK, JSS, and XY, contributed to the design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; WMM, SJ, MK, JSS, and XY, contributed to the draft of the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content; WMM, SJ, MK, JSS, and XY, approved the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that the questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Miller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest for the completion of this project and manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, W., Jeon, S., Kang, M. et al. Does Performance-Related Information Augment the Maximal Isometric Force in the Elbow Flexors?. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 46, 91–101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-020-09492-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-020-09492-x

Keywords

Navigation