Abstract
StressEraser® is a commercially marketed biofeedback device designed to enhance heart rate variability. StressEraser® makes its internal calculations on beat-to-beat measures of finger pulse intervals. However, the accuracy and precision of StressEraser® in quantifying interbeat intervals using finger pulse intervals has not been evaluated against standard laboratory equipment using R–R intervals. Accuracy was assessed by simultaneously recording interbeat intervals using StressEraser® and a standard laboratory ECG system. The interbeat intervals were highly correlated between the systems. The average deviation in interbeat interval recordings between the systems was approximately 6 ms. Moreover, correlations approached unity between the systems on estimates of heart period, heart rate, and heart rate variability. Feedback from StressEraser® is based on an interbeat time series that provides sufficient information to provide an excellent estimate of the dynamic changes in heart rate and heart rate variability. The slight variations between StressEraser® and the laboratory equipment in quantifying heart rate and heart rate variability are due to features related to monitoring heart rate with finger pulse: (1) a lack in precision in the peak of the finger pulse relative to the clearly defined inflection point in the R-wave, and (2) contribution of variations in pulse transit time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry, R. J., & Mitchell, F. H. (1987). A comparison of phasic cardiac responses derived from the electrocardiogram and the peripheral pulse. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 5, 73–78.
Gamelin, F. X., Berthoin, S., & Bosquet, L. (2006). Validity of the Polar S810 heart rate monitor to measure R-R intervals at rest. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38(5), 887–893.
Heilman, K. J., & Porges, S. W. (2007). Accuracy of the LifeShirt (Vivometrics) in the detection of cardiac rhythms. Biological Psychology, 75, 300–305.
Jennings, J. R., Westervelt, W. W., & Ackles, P. K. (1987). On plethysmographic measures of heart rate responses. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (vol. 2, pp. 233–239), New York: JAI Press.
Porges, S. W. (1985). Method and apparatus for evaluating rhythmic oscillations in aperiodic physiological response systems. US patent, 4,510,944.
Porges, S. W., & Bohrer, R. E. (1990). Analyses of periodic processes in psychophysiological research. In: T. J. Caccioppo & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 708–753). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Porges, S. W., & Byrne, E. A. (1992). Research methods for measurement of heart rate and respiration. Biological Psychology, 34(2–3), 93–130.
Acknowledgments
The project described was supported by NIH Grant Number R21 MH067446. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIH. We would like to thank Helicor for providing the StressEraser® devices for evaluation as described in the manuscript.
Disclosure
S.W. Porges is a member of the Helicor Scientific Advisory Board.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heilman, K.J., Handelman, M., Lewis, G. et al. Accuracy of the StressEraser® in the Detection of Cardiac Rhythms. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 33, 83–89 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-008-9054-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-008-9054-1