Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 124 samples were collected from the intestine of broiler chickens, piglet faeces, fermented foods, soils and Chinese herbs. More than 750 strains of aerobic, spore-forming bacteria were isolated from these samples. The inhibitory activity of these spore-forming strains against Escherichia coli K88, E. coli K99, Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus was assessed using a disc plate diffusion assay. The six bacilli with the largest inhibition zones against the four indicator bacteria were chosen and assessed for their resistance to unfavorable conditions within simulated gut environments. The strain Bacillus subtilis MA139 showed full resistance to pH 2, 0.3% bile salts and exhibited the highest antimicrobial activity. Based on these results, B. subtilis MA139 was selected as a potential probiotic and fed to piglets at concentrations of 2.2 × 105, 2.2 × 106 or 2.2 × 107 CFU/g of feed during a 28-day feeding trial. A negative control consisting of the basal diet with no additives and a positive control consisting of the basal diet supplemented with 16 g/ton flavomycin were also included. Ninety piglets between 35 and 40 days old were used in the in vivo animal trials. B. subtilis MA139 enhanced daily gain (P = 0.10) and feed conversion (P = 0.03) compared with the negative control. The performance of pigs fed B. subtilis MA139 supplemented diets did not differ from that of pigs fed the antibiotic diet. There was a significant increase in Lactobacilli cell counts (P = 0.02) and a numerical decrease in E. coli counts (P = 0.05) in the faecal samples of pigs fed B. subtilis MA139 with 2.2 × 105 CFU/g of feed. The overall results of this study show that the use of initial co-culture with indicator pathogens, a disc plate diffusion assay and simulated gut environment tolerance tests is one of effective methods of screening Bacillus for probiotic use and that B. subtilis MA139 is a promising alternative to antibiotics for use as a feed additive in piglet diets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adami A, Cavazzoni V (1999) Occurrence of selected bacterial groups in the feces of piglets fed with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic. J Basic Microbiol 39:3–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulos C, Georgoulakis IE, Tzivara A, Kyriakis CS, Govaris A, Kyriakis SC (2004) Field evaluation of the effect of a probiotic-containing Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis spores on the health status, performance, and carcass quality of grower and finisher pigs. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 51:306–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asai T, Otagiri Y, Osumi T, Namimatsu T, Hirai H, Sato S (2002) Isolation of Salmonella from diarrheic feces of pigs. J Vet Med Sci 64:159–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa TM, Serra CR, La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ, Henriques AO (2005) Screening for Bacillus isolates in the broiler gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:968–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casula G, Cutting SM (2002) Bacillus probiotics: spore germination in the gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2344–2352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YH, Kim JK, Kim HJ, Kim WY, Kim YB, Park YH (2001) Selection of a potential probiotic Lactobacillus strain and subsequent in vivo studies. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 80:193–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cladera-Olivera F, Caron GR, Brandelli A (2004) Bacteriocin-like substance production by Bacillus licheniformis strain P40. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:251–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duc le H, Hong HA, Barbosa TM, Henriques AO, Cutting SM (2004) Characterization of Bacillus probiotics available for human use. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:2161–2171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne C, O’Mahony L, Murphy L, Thornton G, Morrissey D, O’Halloran S, Feeney M, Flynn S, Fitzgerald G, Daly C, Kiely B, O’Sullivan GC, Shanahan F, Collins JK (2001) In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am J Clin Nutr 73:386S–392S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother JM, Nadeau E, Gyles CL (2005) Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: an update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Anim Health Res Rev 6:17–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floch MH, Binder HJ, Filburn B, Gershengoren W (1972) The effect of bile acids on intestinal microflora. Am J Clin Nutr 25:1418–1426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foldes T, Banhegyi I, Herpai Z, Varga L, Szigeti J (2000) Isolation of Bacillus strains from the rhizosphere of cereals and in vitro screening for antagonism against phytopathogenic, food-borne pathogenic and spoilage micro-organisms. J Appl Microbiol 89:840–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller R (1986) Probiotics. Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser 15:1S–7S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller R (1989) Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol 66:365–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong HA, Duc le H, Cutting SM (2005) The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbial Rev 29:813–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoi T, Ametani A, Kiuchi K, Kaminogawa S (1999) Changes in fecal microflora induced by intubation of mice with Bacillus subtilis (natto) spores are dependent upon dietary components. Can J Microbiol 45:59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Adams MC (2004) In vitro assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tolerance of potential probiotic dairy propionibacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 91:253–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyronimus B, Le Marrec C, Sassi AH, Deschamps A (2000) Acid and bile tolerance of spore-forming lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 61:193–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kritas SK, Morrison RB (2005) Evaluation of probiotics as a substitute for antibiotics in a large pig nursery. Vet Rec 156:447–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakis SC, Tsiloyiannis VK, Vlemmas J, Sarris K, Tsinas AC, Alexopoulos C, Jansegers L (1999) The effect of probiotic LSP 122 on the control of post-weaning diarrhoea syndrome of piglets. Res Vet Sci 67:223–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyver A, Smith JP, Austin J, Blanchfield B (1998) Competitive inhibition of Clostridium botulinum type E by Bacillus species in a value-added seafood product packaged under a modified atmosphere. Food Res Int 31:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen LL, Jakobsen M, Jensen BB (2003) Effects of dietary oligosaccharides on microbial diversity and fructo-oligosaccharide degrading bacteria in feces of piglets post-weaning. Anim Feed Sci Technol 109:133–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1998) Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th edn. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Oscariz JC, Lasa I, Pisabarro AG (1999) Detection and characterization of cerein 7, a new bacteriocin produced by Bacillus cereus with a broad spectrum of activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 178:337–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan DJ (2001) Screening of intestinal microflora for effective probiotic bacteria. J Agric Food Chem 49:1751–1760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchuk IV, Bressollier P, Verneuil B, Fenet B, Sorokulova IB, Megraud F, Urdaci MC (2001) In vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of the probiotic strain Bacillus subtilis 3 is due to secretion of antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:3156–3161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scharek L, Guth J, Reiter K, Weyrauch KD, Taras D, Schwerk P, Schierack P, Schmidt MF, Wieler LH, Tedin K (2005) Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on development of the immune system of sows and piglets. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 105:151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson PJ, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C, Ross RP (2004) The evaluation of a mupirocin-based selective medium for the enumeration of Bifidobacteria from probiotic animal feed. J Microbiol Methods 57:9–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JL, Dritz SS, Minton JE (2001) Review: alternatives to conventional antimicrobials in swine diets. Prof Anim Sci 17:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervaeke IJ, Van Nevel CJ, Decuypere JA, Van Assche PF (1973) A comparison of two methods for obtaining anaerobic counts in different segments of the gastro-intestinal tract of piglets. J Appl Bacteriol 36:397–405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zani JL, da Cruz FW, dos Santos AF, Gil-Turnes C (1998) Effect of probiotic CenBiot on the control of diarrhoea and feed efficiency in pigs. J Appl Microbiol 84:68–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G, Slavik MF (1999) Isolation, partial purification and characterization of a bacteriocin produced by a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain. Lett Appl Microbiol 28:363–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. We thank Dr. Phil Thacker from the University of Saskatchewan for the valuable advice and the manuscript polishing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Key Laboratory on Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, No. 2. West Road Yuanmingyuan, Beijing, 100094, P.R. China

    Xiaohua Guo, Defa Li, Wenqing Lu, Xiangshu Piao & Xiaoling Chen

Authors
  1. Xiaohua Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Defa Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenqing Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiangshu Piao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoling Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Defa Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, X., Li, D., Lu, W. et al. Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 90, 139–146 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-006-9067-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-006-9067-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation