Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable transportation planning for a three-stage fixed charge multi-objective transportation problem

  • S.I.: OR for Sustainability in Supply Chain Management
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the recent past, sustainability has become a major concern for transportation policies and planning in both developed and developing countries. This paper focuses on transportation sustainability for a three-stage fixed charge transportation problem. The major components of transportation sustainability considered include economical issues, social concerns, environmental concerns, and transportation system efficiency. Another important issue considered from a social point of view is the interrelationships between various customers of an end product, which has several benefits culminating in a healthier bottom line. The approach adopted in this paper consists of two phases, wherein the efficiency of vehicles is evaluated independently on all three parameters of sustainability using the data envelopment analysis technique in the first phase. The second phase consists of optimizing an integrated multi-objective optimization model that utilizes efficiency of the vehicles obtained from the first phase in a benefit criterion, considering the interrelationships among customers in terms of minimizing the independence values, and maximizing total profits along with many real-world constraints. Numerical illustration of a real-world case is included in order to demonstrate the utility of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amirteimoori, A. (2010). An extended transportation problem: A DEA based approach. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 19(4), 513–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baidya, A., Bera, U. K., & Maiti, M. (2016). The grey linear programming approach and its application to multi-objective multi-stage solid transportation problem. Opsearch, 53, 500–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, M. (2011). Influence from the business environment on environmental purchasing—Drivers and hinders of purchasing green transportation services. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 17(1), 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brezina, I., et al. (2010). Multi-stage transportation problem with capacity limit. International Journal of Lean Thinking, 1(1), 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central European University (CEU). (2001). Council resolution on the integration of environment and sustainable development into the transport policy.

  • Chang, Y. T., Zhang, N., Danao, D., & Zhgang, N. (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy, 58, 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Q., & Li, Y. (2014). The evaluation of transportation energy efficiency: An application of three-stage virtual frontier DEA. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 29, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Bera, U. K., & Maiti, M. (2018). Defuzzification and application of trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy variables to green solid transportation problem. Soft Computing, 22(7), 2275–2297.

  • Deakin, M., Curwell, S., & Lombardi, P. (2002). Sustainable urban development: The framework and directory of assessment methods. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 4, 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. (1977). How to use multi-attribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7(5), 326–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellaimony, E. M., et al. (2015). Solution of a class of bi-criteria multistage transportation problem using dynamic programming technique. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 4(4), 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falsini, D., Fondi, F., & Schiraldi, M. M. (2012). A logistic provider evaluation and selection methodology based on AHP, DEA and linear programming integration. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4822–4829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangadwala, H., & Dhodiya, J. (2012). Transportation problem issues and solutions with a technological approach. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management, 1(2), 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., & Kumar, A. (2012). A new method for solving linear multi-objective transportation problems with fuzzy parameters. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(4), 1421–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M. K., Aggarwal, U., & Charles, V. (2018). An integrated AHP-DEA multi-objective optimization model for sustainable transportation in mining industry. Resources Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.04.007.

  • Haimes, Y., Lasdon, L., & Wismer, D. (1971). On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1, 296–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isermann, H. (1979). The enumeration of all efficient solutions for a linear multi-objective transportation problem. Naval Research Logistics, 26(1), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, C. M., & Amekudzi, A. (2005). Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: Definitions, indicators, and metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11, 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, X., Wu, J., & Zhu, Q. (2016). Eco-design of transportation in sustainable supply chain management: A DEA like method. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48, 451–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal, I. C, Jr., Garcia, P. A. A., & D’Agosto, M. A. (2012). A data envelopment analysis approach to choose transport modes based on eco-efficiency. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 767–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M., & Moore, L. J. (1973). Optimizing transportation problems with multiple objectives. AIIE Transactions, 5(4), 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maity, G., & Roy, S. K. (2014). Solving multi-choice multi-objective transportation problem: A utility function approach. Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 2, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiyer, L. M., & Thakkar, J. J. (2019). Modelling and analysis of inter-modal food grain transportation under hub disruption towards sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 281–297.

  • Mavrotas, G. (2009). Effective implementation of the \(\varepsilon \)-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 213, 455–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, A., & Wang, Q. (2017). The fuzzy multi-objective distribution planner for a green meat supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunkaew, W., & Phruksaphanrat, B. (2009). A multi-objective programming for transportation problem with the consideration of both depot to customer and customer to customer relationship. In Proceedings of the international multi conference of engineers and computer scientists, Vol. 2.

  • Ozbek, M. E., Garza, J. M., & Triantis, K. (2009). Data envelopment analysis as a decision-making tool for transportation professionals. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135(11), 822–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandian, P., & Natarajan, G. (2011). Solving two stage transportation problems. Control, Computation and Information Systems, 140, 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, K. A. A. D., & Rajendran, C. (2011). A hybrid genetic algorithm for solving single-stage fixed-charge transportation problems. Technology Operation Management, 2(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringuest, J. L., & Rinks, D. B. (1987). Interaction solutions for the linear multi-objective transportation problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 32(1), 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohaĉova, V. (2015). A DEA based approach for optimization of urban public transport system. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 23(1), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 6). Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2001). Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio, B. R., Neto, O. L., & Sampaio, Y. (2008). Efficiency analysis of public transport systems: Lessons for institutional planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(3), 445–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, J. R., & O”Leary, D. E. (1989). Use of penalties in a branch and bound procedure for the fixed charge transportation problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 43(3), 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi, N., Seyyed-Esfahani, M., & Soleimani, H. (2014). Modeling and solving a three-stage fixed charge transportation problem considering stochastic demand and price. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Studies, 2(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Oslo, Norway: United Nations General Assembly, Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

  • Yousefi, A., & Vencheh, A. H. (2010). An integrated group decision making model and its evaluation by DEA for automobile industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8543–8556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Editor, Guest Editor and anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions to improve the presentation of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Gupta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehlawat, M.K., Kannan, D., Gupta, P. et al. Sustainable transportation planning for a three-stage fixed charge multi-objective transportation problem. Ann Oper Res (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03451-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03451-4

Keywords

Navigation