Skip to main content
Log in

Combining principal component analysis and the evidential reasoning approach for healthcare quality assessment

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient experience and satisfaction surveys have been adopted worldwide to evaluate healthcare quality. Nevertheless, national governments and the general public continue to search for optimal methods to assess healthcare quality from the patient’s perspective. This study proposes a new hybrid method, which combines principal component analysis (PCA) and the evidential reasoning (ER) approach, for assessing patient satisfaction. PCA is utilized to transform correlated items into a few uncorrelated principal components (PCs). Then, the ER approach is employed to aggregate extracted PCs, which are considered as multiple attributes or criteria within the ER framework. To compare the performance of the proposed method with that of another assessment method, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is employed to acquire the weight of each assessment item in the hierarchical assessment framework, and the ER approach is used to aggregate patient evaluation for each item. Compared with the combined AHP and ER approach, which relies on the respondents’ subjective judgments to calculate criterion and subcriterion weights in the assessment framework, the proposed method is highly objective and completely based on survey data. This study contributes a novel and innovative hybrid method that can help hospital administrators obtain an objective and aggregated healthcare quality assessment based on patient experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behara, R. S., Fisher, W. W., & Lemmink, J. G. A. M. (2002). Modelling and evaluating service quality measurement using neural networks. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22, 1162–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 2341–2354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G., & Güleryüz, S. (2011). Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9407–9424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlucci, D., Renna, P., & Schiuma, G. (2013). Evaluating service quality dimensions as antecedents to outpatient satisfaction using back propagation neural network. Health Care Manage Science, 16, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2000). The NHS plan. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2013). Victorian health service performance monitoring framework. Victoria: Victorian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragkiadakis, G., Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C., & Germain, C. (2016). Operational and economic efficiency analysis of public hospitals in Greece. Annals of Operations Research, 247, 787–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E., Farquhar, M., Crofton, C., Darby, C., & Garfinkel, S. (2005). Measuring hospital care from the patients’ perspective: An overview of the CAHPS Hospital Survey development process. Health Services Research, 40, 1977–1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. E., Swindle, R. W., Mungai, S. M., Weinberger, M., & Tierney, W. M. (1999). Measuring patient satisfaction for quality improvement. Medical Care, 37, 1207–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishizaka, A., Balkenbourg, D., & Kaplan, T. (2010). Does AHP help us to make a choice? An experimental evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 1801–1812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., & Bruster, S. (2002). The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 14, 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., Reeves, R., Bruster, S., & Richards, N. (2003). Properties of the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire in a randomized controlled trial of long versus short form survey instruments. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 25, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, A. K., Orav, E. J., Zheng, J., & Epstein, A. M. (2008). Patients’ perception of hospital care in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 1921–1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, A. C., Bergman, M. M., Heinzmann, C., Todorov, A., Weber, H., & Heberer, M. (2014). The relationship between hospital patients’ ratings of quality of care and communication. Internal Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26, 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S., O’Malley, A. J., Hays, R. D., Matthew, R. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., et al. (2005). Methods used to streamline the CAHPS Hospital Survey. Health Services Research, 40, 2057–2077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleefstra, S. M., Kool, R. B., Veldkamp, C. M., Winters-van der Meer, A. C., Mens, M. A., et al. (2010). A core questionnaire for the assessment of patient satisfaction in academic hospitals in The Netherlands: Development and first results in a nationwide study. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19, e24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, G. L., Xu, D. L., Body, R., Yang, J. B., Mackway-Jones, K. R. H., & Carley, S. (2012). A belief rule-based decision support system for clinical risk assessment of cardiac chest pain. European Journal of Operational Research, 219, 564–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, G. L., Xu, D.-L., Liu, X., & Yang, J.-B. (2009). Applying a belief rule-base inference methodology to a guideline-based clinical decision support system. Expert Systems, 26, 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, G. L., Xu, D.-L., Yang, J.-B., & Ma, X. M. (2015). Combined medical quality assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 5522–5530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyratzopoulos, G., Elliott, M. N., Barbiere, J. M., Staetsky, L., Paddison, C. A., et al. (2011). How can health care organizations be reliably compared? Lessons from a national survey of patient experience. Medical Care, 49, 724–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2017). An investigation of constraints upon fisheries diversification using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Marine Policy, 86, 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (1998). Biostatistics: The bare essentials. Hamilton: C. Decker Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotis, M., Kostas, K., & Ioannis, M. (2016). Factors affecting primary health care centers’ economic and production efficiency. Annals of Operations Research, 247, 807–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. S., Egilmez, G., & Kucukvar, M. (2015). A novel life cycle-based principal component analysis framework for eco-efficiency analysis: Case of the United States manufacturing and transportation nexus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, D. (2006). Efficiency and total quality management in health care organizations: A dynamic frontier approach. Annals of Operations Research, 145, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcărea, V. L., Gheorghe, I. R., & Petrescu, C. M. (2013). The assessment of perceived service quality of public health care services in Romania using the SERVQUAL scale. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, H., von Glahn, T., Elliott, M., Rogers, W., & Safran, D. (2009). The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences: A statewide evaluation. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, 1281–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuković, M., Gvozdenović, B. S., Gajić, T., Stamatović Gajić, B., Jakovljević, M., & McCormick, B. P. (2012). Validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire in primary health care. Public Health, 126, 710–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2006). Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 1885–1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, E. L., Leung, M. C., Cheung, A. W., Yam, C. H., Yeoh, E. K., & Griffiths, S. (2011). A population-based survey using PPE-15: Relationship of care aspects to patient satisfaction in Hong Kong. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 23, 390–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D.-L. (2012). An introduction and survey of the evidential reasoning approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 195, 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D. L., McCarthy, G., & Yang, J. B. (2006). Intelligent decision system and its application in business innovation self assessment. Decision Support Systems, 42, 664–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. B. (2001). Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 131, 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. B., & Singh, M. G. (1994). An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 24, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2002). On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 32, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81771938, 81301296). This study was also supported by Grants from Peking University (Grant Nos. PKU2017LCX05, BMU20160592).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilan Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, G., Jiang, L., Yin, X. et al. Combining principal component analysis and the evidential reasoning approach for healthcare quality assessment. Ann Oper Res 271, 679–699 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2789-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2789-z

Keywords

Navigation