Skip to main content
Log in

Partial up-stream advanced payment and partial down-stream delayed payment in a three-level supply chain

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a competitive market, the retailers, in order to encourage the customers to increase their orders, give them the opportunity to pay a fraction of the purchasing cost after delivery of the ordered items (i.e., down-stream partial delayed payment). On the other hand, the suppliers, in order to reduce the risk of cancellations of orders from buyers, may ask the retailers to pay a portion of the purchasing cost before delivery of products (i.e., up-stream partial prepayment). In this paper, an EOQ model with down-stream partial delayed payment and up-stream partial prepayment under three different scenarios (without shortage, with full backordering and with partial backordering) is presented. In order to find the optimal solutions of the models developed for different scenarios, the convexity of the objective functions (i.e., total cost functions) are proved and then closed-form optimal solutions are derived. Also, a solution algorithm is proposed for the model of the third scenario. To demonstrate the applicability of the framework, some numerical examples are presented. Finally, sensitivity analyses are made on several key parameters, in order to gain some managerial insight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, S., & Jaggi, C. (1995). Ordering policies of deteriorating items under permissible delay in payments. Journal of the operational Research Society, 5, 658–662.

  • Bhunia, A., Jaggi, C. K., Sharma, A., & Sharma, R. (2014). A two-warehouse inventory model for deteriorating items under permissible delay in payment with partial backlogging. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 232, 1125–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhunia, A. K., & Shaikh, A. A. (2015). An application of PSO in a two-warehouse inventory model for deteriorating item under permissible delay in payment with different inventory policies. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 256, 831–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhunia, A., Shaikh, A., & Gupta, R. (2015). A study on two-warehouse partially backlogged deteriorating inventory models under inflation via particle swarm optimisation. International Journal of Systems Science, 46(6), 1036–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, R. L. (1992). The effect of the timing of disbursements on order quantities. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 10, 971–977.

  • Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., & Sana, S. S. (2015). Multi-item EOQ inventory model in a two-layer supply chain while demand varies with promotional effort. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39, 6725–6737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. T., Ouyang, L.-Y., & Teng, J.-T. (2003). An EOQ model for deteriorating items under supplier credits linked to ordering quantity. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 27(12), 983–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoreishi, M., Weber, G. W., & Mirzazadeh, A. (2015). An inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with partial backlogging, permissible delay in payments, inflation-and selling price-dependent demand and customer returns. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S. K. (1985). Economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments. Journal of the operational research society, 4, 335–338.

  • Gupta, R., Bhunia, A., & Goyal, S. (2009). An application of genetic algorithm in solving an inventory model with advance payment and interval valued inventory costs. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(5), 893–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F. W. (1990). How many parts to make at once. Operations Research, 38(6), 947–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. F. (2003). Optimal retailer’s ordering policies in the EOQ model under trade credit financing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(9), 1011–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A., Sarker, B., & Wang, S. (1997). An ordering policy for deteriorating items with allowable shortage and permissible delay in payment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 8, 826–833.

  • Kaanodiya, K., & Pachauri, R. (2012). An EPQ model under two levels of trade credit and limited storage space. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3(3), 445–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lashgari, M., Taleizadeh, A. A., & Sana, S. S. (2016). An inventory control problem for deteriorating items with back-ordering and financial consideration under two levels of trade credit linked to order quantity. Journal of Industrial and management optimization, 12(3), 1091–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, H. S., & Lau, A. H.-L. (1993). The effect of cost disbursement timings in inventory control. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(7), 739–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, J. J. (2008). An EOQ model with noninstantaneous receipt and exponentially deteriorating items under two-level trade credit. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 852–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti, A., Maiti, M., & Maiti, M. (2009). Inventory model with stochastic lead-time and price dependent demand incorporating advance payment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(5), 2433–2443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti, A. K., Bhunia, A. K., & Maiti, M. (2007). Some inventory problems via genetic algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, Vidyasagar University, India.

  • Min, J., Zhou, Y.-W., & Zhao, J. (2010). An inventory model for deteriorating items under stock-dependent demand and two-level trade credit. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(11), 3273–3285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, L. Y., & Chang, C.-T. (2013). Optimal production lot with imperfect production process under permissible delay in payments and complete backlogging. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 610–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, L. Y., Ho, C.-H., Su, C.-H., & Yang, C.-T. (2015). An integrated inventory model with capacity constraint and order-size dependent trade credit. Computers & Industrial Engineering.

  • Ouyang, L. Y., Teng, J.-T., & Chen, L.-H. (2006). Optimal ordering policy for deteriorating items with partial backlogging under permissible delay in payments. Journal of Global Optimization, 34(2), 245–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentico, D. W., & Drake, M. J. (2009). The deterministic EOQ with partial backordering: A new approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salameh, M., Abboud, N., El-Kassar, A., & Ghattas, R. (2003). Continuous review inventory model with delay in payments. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(1), 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sana, S. S., & Chaudhuri, K. (2008). A deterministic EOQ model with delays in payments and price-discount offers. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(2), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, D., Seifert, R. W., & Protopappa-Sieke, M. (2013). A review of trade credit literature: Opportunities for research in operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 231(2), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N. H. (2015). Manufacturer-retailer inventory model for deteriorating items with price-sensitive credit-linked demand under two-level trade credit financing and profit sharing contract. Cogent Engineering, 2(1).

  • Singh, C., & Singh, S. (2015). Progressive trade credit policy in a supply chain with and without stock-out for supplier’s lead time under inflationary and fuzzy environment. Systems Science & Control Engineering: An Open Access Journal(just-accepted), 1–33.

  • Singh, T., & Pattanayak, H. (2015). An ordering policy with time-proportional deterioration, linear demand and permissible delay in payment. In L. C. Jain, H. S. Behera, J. K. Mandal & D. P. Mohapatra (Eds.), Computational intelligence in data mining-volume 3. (pp. 649–658), Springer.

  • Taleizadeh, A. A. (2014a). An economic order quantity model for deteriorating item in a purchasing system with multiple prepayments. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(23), 5357–5366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A. (2014b). An EOQ model with partial backordering and advance payments for an evaporating item. International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A., & Nematollahi, M. (2014). An inventory control problem for deteriorating items with back-ordering and financial considerations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(1), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Niaki, S. T. A., & Nikousokhan, R. (2011). Constraint multiproduct joint-replenishment inventory control problem using uncertain programming. Applied Soft Computing, 11(8), 5143–5154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Pentico, D. W., Jabalameli, M. S., & Aryanezhad, M. (2013a). An economic order quantity model with multiple partial prepayments and partial backordering. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(3), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Pentico, D. W., Jabalameli, M. S., & Aryanezhad, M. (2013b). An EOQ model with partial delayed payment and partial backordering. Omega, 41(2), 354–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Wee, H.-M., & Jolai, F. (2013). Revisiting a fuzzy rough economic order quantity model for deteriorating items considering quantity discount and prepayment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(5), 1466–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, J. T. (2009). Optimal ordering policies for a retailer who offers distinct trade credits to its good and bad credit customers. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, J. T., Lou, K.-R., & Wang, L. (2014). Optimal trade credit and lot size policies in economic production quantity models with learning curve production costs. International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 318–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, J. T., Min, J., & Pan, Q. (2012). Economic order quantity model with trade credit financing for non-decreasing demand. Omega, 40(3), 328–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Chan, Y.-L. (2014). Lot-sizing policies for deteriorating items with expiration dates and partial trade credit to credit-risk customers. International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. l., & Zhou, J.-C. (2015). Retailer’s optimal ordering secision with trade credit financing. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the 5th international Asia conference on industrial engineering and management innovation (IEMI2014).

  • Yadav, D., Singh, S., & Kumari, R. (2015). Retailer’s optimal policy under inflation in fuzzy environment with trade credit. International Journal of Systems Science, 46(4), 754–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourmohammad-Zia, N., & Taleizadeh, A. A. (2015). A lot-sizing model with backordering under hybrid linked-to-order multiple advance payments and delayed payment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 82, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, A. X. (1996). Optimal advance payment scheme involving fixed per-payment costs. Omega, 24(5), 577–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Dong, M., Luo, J., & Segerstedt, A. (2014a). Supply chain coordination with trade credit and quantity discount incorporating default risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 153, 352–360.

  • Zhang, Q., Tsao, Y. C., & Chen, T. H. (2014b). Economic order quantity under advance payment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(24), 5910–5921.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF). [grant number INSF-94001671].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ata Allah Taleizadeh.

Appendices

Appendix A: Convexity of equation (10) and finding its roots

The first partial derivative of \(\Delta (K,T)\) respect to T is as below;

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \Delta _1 (K,T)}{\partial T}=-\frac{\psi _1}{T^{2}}+\gamma (K) \end{aligned}$$
(61)

Setting the above equation equal to zero gives:

$$\begin{aligned} T^*=T^*\left( K \right) =\sqrt{\frac{\psi _1 }{\gamma (K)}} \end{aligned}$$
(62)

Discriminant of \(\gamma (K)=\psi _2 K^{2}-2\psi _3 K+\psi _4 , \Delta =b^{2}-4ac\) is shown in Eq. (63).

$$\begin{aligned} \Delta =4\psi ^{2}_3 -4\psi _2 \psi _4 =C^{2}_b D^{2}-\left( {D(C_b +C_h +i_1 C_p )} \right) \left( {C_b D} \right) =-D^{2}C_b \left( {C_h +i_1 C_p } \right) <0\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(63)

Since \(\Delta \) is always negative, \(\gamma (K)\) does not have any root, and so its value is always either positive or negative. On the other hand, regarding \(\gamma (0)=\frac{C_b D}{2}>0\), it is obvious that \(\gamma (K)\) takes always a positive value in the range of [0, 1]. Hence, for any given value ofK, a unique value is obtained for \(T^{*}\), using Eq. (62). If Eq. (62) is substituted into Eq. (26), we will have:

$$\begin{aligned} \Delta (K)=\frac{\psi _1 }{\sqrt{\frac{\psi _1 }{\gamma (K)}}}+\sqrt{\frac{\psi _1 }{\gamma (K)}}\gamma (K)+\psi _5 =2\sqrt{\psi _1 \gamma (K)}+\psi _5 \end{aligned}$$
(64)

The above Equation gives a unique minimal cost for any given value of K. It should be noticed that \(\Delta (K)\)is continuous on the compact interval [0, 1]. Therefore, it may have more than one local minima, the smallest of which will be the global minimum. In order to find the global minimum solution, the first and the second derivatives of \(\Delta (K)\) with respect to K are taken, as provided in Eqs. (65) and (66), respectively.

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\Delta (K)}{dK}= & {} \sqrt{\psi _1 }\frac{\gamma ^{{\prime }}(K)}{\sqrt{\gamma (K)}}\end{aligned}$$
(65)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d^{2}\Delta (K)}{dK^{2}}= & {} \frac{\sqrt{\psi _1 }\left[ {2\gamma ^{{\prime }{\prime }}(K)\gamma (K)-\left( {\gamma ^{{\prime }}(K)} \right) ^{2}} \right] }{2\left( {\gamma (K)} \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}} \end{aligned}$$
(66)

For all amounts of K, we have:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d^{2}\Delta (K)}{dK^{2}}= & {} \frac{\sqrt{\psi _1 }\left[ {2\gamma ^{{\prime }{\prime }}(K)\gamma (K)-\left( {\gamma ^{{\prime }}(K)} \right) ^{2}} \right] }{2\left( {\gamma (K)} \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}}\nonumber \\= & {} \frac{\sqrt{\psi _1 }\left[ {\left( {2\psi _2 } \right) \left( {\psi _2 K^{2}-2\psi _3 K+\psi _4 } \right) -\left( {\psi _2 K-\psi _3 } \right) ^{2}} \right] }{\left( {\gamma (K)} \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}} \nonumber \\= & {} \frac{\sqrt{\psi _1 }\left[ {2\left( {\psi ^{2}_2 K^{2}-2\psi _2 \psi _3 K+\psi _2 \psi _4 } \right) -\left( {\psi ^{2}_2 K-2\psi _2 \psi _3 K+\psi ^{2}_3 } \right) } \right] }{\left( {\gamma (K)} \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}} \nonumber \\= & {} \frac{\sqrt{\psi _1 }\left[ {\left( {\psi ^{2}_2 K^{2}-2\psi _2 \psi _3 K+\psi _2 \psi _4 } \right) +\psi _2 \psi _3 -\psi ^{2}_3 } \right] }{\left( {\gamma (K)} \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}}\nonumber \\= & {} \frac{\sqrt{\psi _1 }\left[ {\psi _2 \left( {\psi _2 K^{2}-2\psi _3 K+\psi _4 } \right) +(\psi _2 -\psi _3 )\psi _3 } \right] }{\left( {\gamma (K)} \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}} \nonumber \\= & {} \frac{\sqrt{\psi _1 }\left[ {\psi _2 \gamma (K)+(\psi _2 -\psi _3 )\psi _3 } \right] }{\left( {\gamma (K)} \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}}>0 \end{aligned}$$
(67)

Considering that \(\psi _1 ,\psi _2 ,\psi _3 ,\gamma (K)\) are positive and also \((\psi _2 -\psi _3 )=\frac{D(C_h +i_1 C_p )}{2}>0\), function \(\Delta _1 (K)\) is convex and so has a global minimum. In order to obtain this optimal point, the first derivative of \(\mathop \Delta \limits ^\wedge _1 (K)\) with respect to K is set equal to zero:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{d\Delta _1 (K)}{dK}=\sqrt{\psi _1 }\frac{\gamma ^{{\prime }}(K)}{\sqrt{\gamma (K)}}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(68)

Since \(\sqrt{\psi _1 }\) and \(\gamma (K)\) are positive, it can be concluded from Eq. (34) that \(\gamma ^{{\prime }}(K)\) is equal to zero, i.e.,

$$\begin{aligned} \gamma ^{{\prime }}(K)=2\psi _2 K-2\psi _3 =0 \end{aligned}$$
(69)

Equation (69) gives:

$$\begin{aligned} K^{*}=\frac{\psi _3 }{\psi _2 }=\frac{C_b }{(C_b +C_h +i_1 C_p )} \end{aligned}$$
(70)

After Substituting \(K^{*}\) into Eq. (62) and simplifying it, the optimal period length is obtained as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} T^{*}=T^{*}\left( {K^{*}} \right) =\sqrt{\frac{2A(C_b +C_h +i_1 C_p )}{DC_b \left( {(C_h +i_1 C_p )} \right) }} \end{aligned}$$
(71)

Appendix B: Finding the roots of \(\varphi (K,T)\) with respect to K and T

From Eq. (51), we have:

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi (K,T)=\psi _1 K^{2}T-\psi _2 KT-\psi _3 K+\psi _4 T+\frac{\psi _5 }{T}+\psi _6 \end{aligned}$$

Taking thefirstderivativesof \(\varphi (K,T)\) with respectto K and T gives:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\varphi (K,T)}{dT}= & {} \psi _1 K^{2}-\psi _2 K+\psi _4 -\frac{\psi _5 }{T^{2}} \rightarrow T=\frac{\psi _5 }{\psi _1 K^{2}-\psi _2 K+\psi _4}\end{aligned}$$
(72)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\varphi (K,T)}{dK}= & {} 2\psi _1 KT-\psi _2 T-\psi _3 \rightarrow K=\frac{\psi _2 T+\psi _3 }{2\psi _1 T} \end{aligned}$$
(73)

After some algebra we have:

$$\begin{aligned} T= & {} \sqrt{\frac{4\psi _1 \psi _5 -\psi _3^{2}}{4\psi _1 \psi _4 -\psi _2^{2}}}\end{aligned}$$
(74)
$$\begin{aligned} K= & {} \frac{\psi _2 }{2\psi _1 }+\frac{\psi _3 }{2\psi _1 }\sqrt{\frac{4\psi _1 \psi _4 -\psi _2^{2}}{4\psi _1 \psi _5 -\psi _3^{2}}} \end{aligned}$$
(75)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lashgari, M., Taleizadeh, A.A. & Ahmadi, A. Partial up-stream advanced payment and partial down-stream delayed payment in a three-level supply chain. Ann Oper Res 238, 329–354 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2100-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2100-5

Keywords

Navigation