Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of methane production in wastewater treatment facility: a data-mining approach

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prediction model for methane production in a wastewater processing facility is presented. The model is built by data-mining algorithms based on industrial data collected on a daily basis. Because of many parameters available in this research, a subset of parameters is selected using importance analysis. Prediction results of methane production are presented in this paper. The model performance by different algorithms is measured with five metrics. Based on these metrics, a model built by the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System algorithm has provided most accurate predictions of methane production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, H., & Kim, K. (2008). Using genetic algorithms to optimize nearest neighbors for data mining. Annals of Operations Research, 163(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakmakci, M. (2007). Adaptive neuro-fuzzy modeling of anaerobic digestion of primary sedimentation sludge. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 30(5), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochain, D. (1995). Recent approaches for the modeling, monitoring and control of anaerobic digestion processes. In Proceedings of the international workshop on monitoring and control of anaerobic digestion processes (pp. 23–29).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamoda, M., Al-Ghusain, I., & Hassan, A. (1999). Integrated wastewater treatment plant performance evaluation using artificial neural networks. Water Science and Technology, 40(7), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holubar, P., Zani, L., Hagar, M., Froschl, W., Radak, Z., & Braun, R. (2000). Modeling of anaerobic digestion using self-organizing maps and artificial neural nets. Water Science and Technology, 41(12), 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holubar, P., Zani, L., Hagar, M., Froschl, W., Radak, Z., & Braun, R. (2002). Advanced controlling of anaerobic digestion by means of hierarchical neural networks. Water Research, 36(10), 2582–2588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, J. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, T., Peng, J., & Terlaky, T. (2009). A confidence voting process for ranking problems based on support vector machines. Annals of Operations Research, 166(1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., & Salustri, F. A. (2007). Computational intelligence in product design engineering: review and trends. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part C, 37(5), 766–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., & Smith, M. (2007). Data mining in design of products and production systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 31(1), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., Caldarone, C., Kelleher, M., Lamb, F., Persoon, T., & Burns, A. (2006). Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: knowledge discovery with a data mining approach. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 36(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., Zheng, H. Y., & Song, Z. (2009). Wind farm power prediction: a data-mining approach. Wind Energy, 12(3), 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., Li, M. Y., & Tang, F. (2010a). Modeling and optimization of HVAC energy consumption. Applied Energy, 87(10), 3092–3102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., Li, M. Y., & Zheng, H. Y. (2010b). Virtual models of indoor-air-quality sensors. Applied Energy, 87(6), 2087–2094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchaim, U. (1992). Biogas process for sustainable development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, W., & Wysotzki, F. (1994). Automatic construction of decision trees for classification. Annals of Operations Research, 52(4), 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontes, F., & Pinto, J. (2006). Analysis of integrated kinetics and flow models for anaerobic digesters. Journal of Chemical Engineering, 122(1–2), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, J., Simutis, R., Dors, M., Havlik, I., & Lubbert, A. (1994). Bioprocess optimization and control: application of hybrid modeling. Journal of Biotechnology, 35(1), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S., Kusiak, A., & O’Donnell, M. (2006). Patient-recognition data-mining model for BCG-plus interferon immunotherapy bladder cancer treatment. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 36(6), 634–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, J., Amouroux, M., & Moletta, R. (1995). Process modeling and control to improve stable operation and optimization of anaerobic digestion process. In Proceedings of the international workshop on monitoring and control of anaerobic digestion processes (pp. 30–35).

    Google Scholar 

  • Takada, T., Sanou, K., & Fukumara, S. (1995). A neural network system for solving an assortment problem in the steel industry. Annals of Operations Research, 57(1), 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, P. N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2006). Introduction to data mining. Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, J., & Zhang, X. (1999). Neural fuzzy modeling of anaerobic biological wastewater treatment systems. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 125(12), 1149–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu, C., & Naidu, K. (2000). Dynamic fuzzy model based predictive controller for a biochemical reactor. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 23(2), 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Sun, X., Golden, B. L., & Jia, J. (1995). Using artificial neural networks to solve the orienteering problem. Annals of Operations Research, 61(1), 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2005). Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, X., Han, P., & Lu, X. (2004). A review on the dewaterability of bio-sludge and ultrasound pretreatment. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 11(6), 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H. Y., & Kusiak, A. (2009). Prediction of wind farm power ramp rates: a data-mining approach. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 131(3), 031011-1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by funding from the Iowa Energy Center Grant No. 10-1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Kusiak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kusiak, A., Wei, X. Prediction of methane production in wastewater treatment facility: a data-mining approach. Ann Oper Res 216, 71–81 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-1037-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-1037-6

Keywords

Navigation