Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental collaboration in a closed-loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) with a single manufacturer and a single retailer who invest in green advertising to build up the goodwill dynamic. The latter has a dual purpose. On one hand, it leads to higher sales and plays the traditional role of marketing tool. On the other hand, it increases the return rate, playing the role of an operational tool. The players evaluate the convenience of collaborating in a CLSC (collaborative remanufacturing) by pursuing both marketing and operational targets implementing a Reverse Revenue Sharing Contract (RRSC). Our findings suggest that green advertising should aim to increase customers’ knowledge and awareness about the return policy because collaboration is successful only when the returns’ residual value is large while the sharing parameter is not too high. Moreover, the inefficiencies that RRSC carries out limit substantially its adoption. A RRSC is payoff-Pareto-improving only in few cases. Finally, we highlight the limitations of previous research in supply chain contracting, which has disregarded the administrative costs of using a two-parameter contract; this lack of consideration leads to imprecise findings and managerial prescriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, V., & Tokay, L. B. (2010). Interdisciplinarity in closed-loop supply chain management research. In F. E. Ferguson & G. C. Souza (Eds.), Closed-loop supply chains: new developments to improve the sustainability of business practices. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amrouche, N., Martin-Herran, G., & Zaccour, G. (2008). Feedback Stackelberg equilibrium strategies when the private label competes with the national brand. Annals of Operation Research, 164, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras, N., Boyaci, T., & Verter, V. (2004). The effect of categorizing returned products in remanufacturing. IIE Transactions, 36(4), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atasu, A., & Çetinkaya, S. (2006). Lot sizing for optimal collection and use of remanufacturable products over a finite life cycle. Production and Operations Management, 15(4), 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. In S. Graves & T. de Kok (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management science: supply chain management. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P., & Lariviere, M. A. (2005). Supply Chain coordination with revenues sharing contracts: strength and limitations. Management Science, 51(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. N. S. (1987). Economic organization and transaction costs. The New Palgrave A Dictionary of Economics, 2, 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C. J., & Savaskan, R. C. (2003). Contracting and coordination in closed-loop supply chains. In V. Daniel, R. Guide, Jr., & L. N. Van Wassenhove (Eds.), Business aspects of closed-loop supply chains: exploring the issues. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, J. D. Jr., & Spier, K. E. (2001). Revenue sharing and vertical control in the video rental industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(3), 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Giovanni, P. (2011). Does environmental management contribute to the triple bottom line? International Journal of Operations and Production Management (to appear).

  • Debo, L. G., Tokay, L. B., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Science, 51(8), 1193–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ouardighi, F., Jørgensen, S., & Pasin, F. (2008). A dynamic game of operations and marketing management in a supply chain. International Journal of Game Theory Review, 34, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. E., & Toktay, L. B. (2006). The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Production and Operations Management, 15(3), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, G., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2006). Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Science, 52(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, M., van Nunen, J., & Grave, B. (2002). Integrating closed-loop supply chains and spare parts in IBM. ERIM Report Series Research in Management. ERS-2002-107-LIS.

  • Geng, Q., & Mallik, S. (2007). Inventory competition and allocation in a multi-channel distribution system. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2), 704–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R., Van Wassanhove, L. N., & Atasu, A. (2007). The economics remanufacturing under limited component durability and finite product life cycles. Management Science, 53(1), 88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guide, V.D.R. Jr. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: Industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guide, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Operations Research, 57(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guide, V. D. R., Jayaraman, V., & Linton, J. D. (2003). Building contingency planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, S., Taboubi, S., & Zaccour, G. (2003). Retail promotions with negative brand image effects: is cooperation possible? European Journal of Operational Research, 150, 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. (2009). Comment on “The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research” by V. D. R. Guide, Jr. and L. N. Van Wassenhove. Operations Research, 57(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumder, P., & Groenevelt, H. (2001). Competition in remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 10, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J., de Witt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacham, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monczka, R. M., Trent, R., & Handfield, R. B. (1998). Purchasing and supply chain management. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, K., Lai, K. K., Leung, S. C. H., & Xiao, D. (2010). Revenue-sharing versus wholesale price mechanisms under different channel power structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 532–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science, 50, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taboubi, S., & Zaccour, G. (2002). Impact of Retailer’s myopia on channel’s strategies. In: Optimal control and differential games. Essays in honour of Steffen Jørgensen. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totty, M. (2002). B2B distribution: The Dell myth—the middle man isn’t dead after all. Wall Street Journal, 16 (September).

  • Tsay, A. A., & Agrawal, N. (2004). Channel conflict and coordination in the E-commerce age. Production & Operations Management, 13, 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscolani, B., & Grosset, L. (2009). Optimal dynamic advertising with an adverse exogenous effect on brand goodwill. Automatica, 45, 863–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2006). Joint pricing-production decisions in supply chains of complementary products with uncertain demand. Operations Research, 54, 1110–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law & Economics, 22, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W. K., Qi, J., & Leung, S. Y. S. (2009). Coordinating supply chains with sales rebate contracts and vendor-management inventory. International Journal of Production Economics, 120, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xerox Corporation (2001). Xerox Environmental Report. Xerox Corporation.

  • Yao, Z., Leung, S. C. H., & Lai, K. K. (2008). Manufacturer’s revenue-sharing contract and retail competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 637–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro De Giovanni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Giovanni, P. Environmental collaboration in a closed-loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract. Ann Oper Res 220, 135–157 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0912-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0912-5

Keywords

Navigation