Skip to main content
Log in

Scenario optimization asset and liability modelling for individual investors

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a scenario optimization model for asset and liability management of individual investors. The individual has a given level of initial wealth and a target goal to be reached within some time horizon. The individual must determine an asset allocation strategy so that the portfolio growth rate will be sufficient to reach the target. A scenario optimization model is formulated which maximizes the upside potential of the portfolio, with limits on the downside risk. Both upside and downside are measured vis-à-vis the goal. The stochastic behavior of asset returns is captured through bootstrap simulation, and the simulation is embedded in the model to determine the optimal portfolio. Post-optimality analysis using out-of-sample scenarios measures the probability of success of a given portfolio. It also allows us to estimate the required increase in the initial endowment so that the probability of success is improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barberis, N., M. Huang, and T. Santos. (2001, February). “Prospect Theory and Asset Prices.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone-Adesi, G., K. Giannopoulos, and L. Vosper. (2002). “Backtesting Derivative Portfolios with Filtered Historical Simulation.” European Financial Management, 8, 31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basak, S. (2002). “A Comparative Study of Portfolio Insurance.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26, 1217–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basak, S. and A. Shapiro. (2001, Summer). “Value-at-Risk based Risk Management: Optimal Policies and Asset Prices.” The Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 371–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S. and R. Thaler. (1995). “Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. and J. Mulvey. (1998). “The HOME Account Advisor: Asset and Liability Management for Individual Investors.” In W. Ziemba and J. Mulvey (eds.), Worldwide Asset and Liability Modeling, pp. 634–665. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., W. Dechert, and J. Scheinkman. (1996). “A Test for Independence Based on the Correlation Dimension. Econometrics Reviews, 15, 197–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, and A. Meeraus. (1992). GAMS: A User’s Guide, Release 2.25. Danvers, MA 01923: The Scientific Press, Boyd and Fraser Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. and L. Viceira. (2002). Strategic Asset Allocation—Portfolio Choice for Long–Term Investors. Claredon Lectures in Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Cario, D., D. Myers, and W. Ziemba. (1998). “Concepts, Technical Issues, and Uses of the Russel–Yasuda Kasai Financial Planning Model.” Operations Research, 46(4), 450–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio, A., F. Cocco, and S. Zenios. (2001). “The Value of Integrative Risk Management for Insurance Products with Minimum Guarantees.” Journal of Risk Finance, 2(3), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio, A., F. Cocco, and S. Zenios. (2004, July–August). “www.personal_asset_allocation.” Interfaces, 34(4), 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio, A., D. Saunders, and S. Zenios. (2003). “Insurance League: Italy vs. UK.” Journal of Risk Finance, 4(4), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R. and H. Mausser. (2000, June). “The Put-Call Efficient Frontier.” Algo Research Quarterly, 3(1), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R. and D. Rosen. (1999). “The Practice of Portfolio Replication. A Practical Overview of Forward and Inverse Problems.” Annals of Operations Research, 85, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani. (1998). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavin, M. and T. Yamashita. (2002). “Owner-Occupied Housing and the Composition of the Household Portfolio.” The American Economic Review, 92(1), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., M. Haliassos, and T. Japelli (Eds.). (2001). Household Portfolios. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, P. and S. Zenios (Eds.). (2000). Performance of Financial Institutions: Efficiency, Innovation, Regulations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2001, August). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.

  • Kahneman, K. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaut, M., S. Wallace, H. Vladimirou, and S.A. Zenios. (2003). “Stability Analysis of a Portfolio Management Model Based on the Conditional Value-at-Risk Measure.” Working paper, HERMES European Center of Excellence on Computational Finance and Economics.

  • Kritzman, M. and D. Rich. (2002, May/June). “The Mismeasurement of Risk.” Financial Analysts Journal, 58(3), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., F. Longstaff, and J. Pan (2003). “Dynamic Asset Allocation with Event Risk.” Journal of Finance, 58(1), 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. (1991). “Individual Versus Institutional Investing.” Financial Services Review, 1(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A. and R. Frey. (2000). “Estimation of Tail-Related Risk Measures for Heteroscedastic Financial Time Series: An Extreme Value Approach.” Journal of Empirical Finance, 7(3), 225–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, R. and E. Prescott. (1985). “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky, M., K. Ho, and C. Robinson. (1997). “Asset Allocation via the Conditional First Exit Time or How to Avoid Outliving Your Money.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. and A. Thorlacius. (1998). “The Towers Perrin Global Capital Market Scenario Generation System.” In W. Ziemba and J. Mulvey (Eds.), Worldwide Asset and Liability Modeling, pp. 286–312. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmquist, J., S. Uryasev, and P. Krokhmal. (2001/02, Winter). “Portfolio Optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk Criterion.” Journal of Risk, 4(2), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf, M. and W. Ziemba. (2004). “Intertemporal Surplus Management.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(5), 975–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uryasev, S. and R. Rockafellar. (2000). “Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk.” Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, W. and J. Mulvey (Eds.). (1998). Worldwide Asset and Liability Modeling. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Consiglio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Consiglio, A., Cocco, F. & Zenios, S.A. Scenario optimization asset and liability modelling for individual investors. Ann Oper Res 152, 167–191 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0133-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0133-5

Keywords

Navigation