Skip to main content
Log in

Zero weights and non-zero slacks: Different solutions to the same problem

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper re-assesses three independently developed approaches that are aimed at solving the problem of zero-weights or non-zero slacks in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The methods are weights restricted, non-radial and extended facet DEA models. Weights restricted DEA models are dual to envelopment DEA models with restrictions on the dual variables (DEA weights) aimed at avoiding zero values for those weights; non-radial DEA models are envelopment models which avoid non-zero slacks in the input-output constraints. Finally, extended facet DEA models recognize that only projections on facets of full dimension correspond to well defined rates of substitution/transformation between all inputs/outputs which in turn correspond to non-zero weights in the multiplier version of the DEA model. We demonstrate how these methods are equivalent, not only in their aim but also in the solutions they yield. In addition, we show that the aforementioned methods modify the production frontier by extending existing facets or creating unobserved facets. Further we propose a new approach that uses weight restrictions to extend existing facets. This approach has some advantages in computational terms, because extended facet models normally make use of mixed integer programming models, which are computationally demanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A.I. and L. M. Seiford (1993). “The Mathematical Programming Approach to Efficiency analysis.” In H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, and S.S. Schmidt (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. pp. 120–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R., A. Athanassopoulos, R.G. Dyson, and E. Thanassoulis (1997). “Weights Re-Strictions and Value Judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, Development and Future Directions.” Annals of perations Research, 73, 13–34.

  • Allen, R. and E. Thanassoulis (2004). “Improving Envelopment in data Envelopment Analy-sis.” European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper (1984). “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessent, A., W. Bessent, J. Elam, and T. Clark (1988). “Efficiency Frontier Determination by Constrained Facet Analysis.” Journal of Operational Research Society, 36(5), 785–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, P.L., A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, Z.M. Huang, and D.B. Sun (1997). “Data Transformations In DEA Cone Ratio Envelopment Approaches for Monitoring Bank Per-formances.” European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz (1985). “Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production Functions.” Journal of Econometrics, 30, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, Z.M. Huang, and D.B. Sun (1990). “Polyhedral Cone-Ratio 30 DEA Models With an Illustrative Application to Large Industrial Banks.” Journal of Econometrics, 46, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes (1978). “Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and R.M. Thrall (1986). “Classifying and Characterizing Efficiencies and Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Operations Research Letters, 5(3), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.W., K.S. Park, and J.T. Pastor (1999). “RAM: A Range Measure of Inefficiency for use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11, 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.W. and K. Tone (1997). “Measures on Inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Estimation.” European Journal of Operational Research, 99, 72– 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. and C.A.K. Lovell (1978). “Measuring The Technical Efficiency of Production.” Journal of Economic Theory, 19(1), 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.H., J.R. Doyle, and W.D. Cook (1996). “Efficiency Bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 482–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P., O.R. Yolalan, and O. Kettani (1995). “Controlled Envelopment by Face Extension in DEA.” Journal of Operational Research Society, 46(4), 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, O.B. and N.C. Petersen (1996). “Indicators of Ill-Conditioned Data Sets and Model Misspecication in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Extended Facet Approach.” Management Science, 42(2), 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, O.B. and N.C. Petersen (2003). “Identication and use of Efficient Faces and Facets in DEA.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20(3), 323–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela, M.C.S., P. Borges, and E. Thanassoulis (2003). “Finding Closest Targets in Non-oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2/3), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela, M.C.S. and E. Thanassoulis (2002). “Profit Efficiency in DEA.” Aston Busi-ness School Research Paper RP0206, ISBN 185449502X, University of Aston, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.

  • Räty, T. (1998). “Efficient facets, Influential Observations and Revisions of The Best Practice Boundary for DEA.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Joensuu.

  • Räty, T. (2002). “Efficient Facet Based Efficiency Index: A Variable Returns to Scale Specification.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17(1/2), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis, E. and R. Allen (1998). “Simulating Weights Restrictions in data Envelopment Analysis by Means of Unibserved DMUs.” Management Science, 44(4), 586–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis, E. and R. Dyson (1992). “Estimating Preferred Input-output Levels Using Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, 80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis, E., M.C.S. Portela, and R. Allen (2004). “Incorporating Value Judgments in DEA.” In W. W. Cooper, L. W. Seiford, and J. Zhu (eds.), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Thompson, R., L. Langemeier, C. Lee, E. Lee, and R.M. Thrall (1990). “The Role of Multiplier Boundas in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming.” Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R.G., P.S. Dharmapala, and R.M. Thrall (1995). “Linked-cone DEA Profitratios and Technical Efficiency with Application to Illinois Coal Mines.” International Journal of Production Economics, 39, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R.G., J.F.D. Singleton, R.M. Thrall, and B.A. Smith (1986). “Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-energy Physics Lab in Texas.” Interfaces, 16, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (1993). “An e-free DEA and a new measure of Efficiency.” Journal of the Opera-Tions Research Society of Japan, 36(3), 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2001). “A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analsysis.” European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (1996). “Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Conceição A. Silva Portela.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Portela, M.C.A.S., Thanassoulis, E. Zero weights and non-zero slacks: Different solutions to the same problem. Ann Oper Res 145, 129–147 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0029-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0029-4

Keywords

Navigation