Skip to main content
Log in

Weak square and stationary reflection

  • Published:
Acta Mathematica Hungarica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well-known that the square principle \({\square_\lambda}\) entails the existence of a non-reflecting stationary subset of λ+, whereas the weak square principle \({\square^{*} _\lambda}\) does not. Here we show that if μcf(λ) < λ for all μ < λ, then \({\square^{*} _\lambda}\) entails the existence of a non-reflecting stationary subset of \({E^{\lambda^+}_{{\rm cf}(\lambda)}}\) in the forcing extension for adding a single Cohen subset of λ+.

It follows that indestructible forms of simultaneous stationary reflection entail the failure of weak square. We demonstrate this by settling a question concerning the subcomplete forcing axiom (SCFA), proving that SCFA entails the failure of \({\square^{*} _\lambda}\) for every singular cardinal λ of countable cofinality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cummings J., Foreman M., Magidor M.: Squares, scales and stationary reflection. J. Math. Log. 1, 35–98 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummings J., Magidor M.: Martin’s maximum and weak square. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139, 3339–3348 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Devlin K.J.: Variations on \({\diamondsuit}\), J. Symbolic Logic. 44, 51–58 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Fuchs, Hierarchies of forcing axioms, the continuum hypothesis and square principles, J. Symbolic Logic (to appear); preprint available at www.math.csi.cuny.edu/~fuchs/.

  5. G. Fuchs, Closure properties of parametric subcompleteness, submitted in 2017; preprint available at www.math.csi.cuny.edu/~fuchs/ .

  6. R. B. Jensen, Subcomplete forcing and \({\mathcal{L}}\) -forcing, in: E-Recursion, Forcing and C*-Algebras, Lect. Notes Ser. Inst. Math. Sci. Natl. Univ. Singap., vol. 27, World Sci. Publ. (Hackensack, NJ, 2014), pp. 83–182.

  7. R. B. Jensen, Forcing axioms compatible with CH, Handwritten notes, available at www.mathematik.hu-berlin.de/~raesch/org/jensen.html (2009).

  8. R. B. Jensen, Subproper and subcomplete forcing, Handwritten notes, available at www.mathematik.hu-berlin.de/~raesch/org/jensen.html (2009).

  9. K. Kunen, Set Theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 102, North-Holland Publishing Co. (Amsterdam, 1983). An introduction to independence proofs, reprint of the 1980 original.

  10. Larson P.: Separating stationary reflection principles. J. Symbolic Logic. 65, 247–258 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Rinot, A relative of the approachability ideal, diamond and non-saturation, J. Symbolic Logic, 75 (2010) 1035–1065.

  12. J. Silver, The independence of Kurepa’s conjecture and two-cardinal conjectures in model theory, in: Axiomatic Set Theory (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XIII, Part I, Univ. California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1967), Amer. Math. Soc. (Providence, RI, 1971), pp. 383–390.

  13. S. Todorčević, Trees and linearly ordered sets, in: Handbook of Set-theoretic Topology, North-Holland (Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 235–293.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Fuchs.

Additional information

The first author was partially supported by PSC-CUNY grant 69656-00 47.

The second author was partially supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant # 1630/14).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuchs, G., Rinot, A. Weak square and stationary reflection. Acta Math. Hungar. 155, 393–405 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-018-0789-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-018-0789-8

Key words and phrases

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation