Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Incentives for Viral Suppression in People Living with HIV

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 10 February 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Only 63% of people living with HIV in the United States are achieving viral suppression. Structural and social barriers limit adherence to antiretroviral therapy which furthers the HIV epidemic while increasing health care costs. This study calculated the cost and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention with cash incentives. People with HIV and detectable viral loads were randomized to usual care or an incentive group. Individuals could earn up to $3650 per year if they achieved and maintained an undetectable viral load. The average 1-year intervention cost, including incentives, was $4105 per patient. The average health care costs were $27,189 per patient in usual care and $35,853 per patient in the incentive group. We estimated a cost of $28,888 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, which is well below accepted cost-per-QALY thresholds. Contingency management with cash incentives is a cost-effective intervention for significantly increasing viral suppression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV basic statistics. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/statistics.html#how-many-people-have-hiv-in-US.

  2. Freedberg KA, Losina E, Weinstein MC, et al. The cost effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):824–31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200103153441108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mai HT, Le GM, Tran BX, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV/AIDS patients in the context of early treatment initiation in Vietnam. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:2131–7. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S175474.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ending HIV transmission, VitalSigns. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/test-treat-prevent/index.html.

  5. Goldie SJ, Paltiel AD, Weinstein MC, et al. Projecting the cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Med. 2003;115(8):632–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathes T, Pieper D, Antoine SL, Eikermann M. Cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions for highly active antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(3):227–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simon-Tuval T, Neumann PJ, Greenberg D. Cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(1):67–84. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2016.1138858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freedberg KA, Hirschhorn LR, Schackman BR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 2006;43(Suppl 1):S113–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.qai.0000248334.52072.25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaric GS, Bayoumi AM, Brandeau ML, Owens DK. The cost-effectiveness of counseling strategies to improve adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy among men who have sex with men. Med Decis Making. 2008;28(3):359–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07312714.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Weinstein MC. Updating cost-effectiveness—the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(9):796–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1405158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cameron D, Ubels J, Norström F. On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1447828. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1447828.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Sadr WM, Donnell D, Beauchamp G, et al. Financial incentives for linkage to care and viral suppression among HIV-positive patients: a randomized clinical trial (HPTN 065). JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(8):1083–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Metsch LR, Feaster DJ, Gooden L, et al. Effect of patient navigation with or without financial incentives on viral suppression among hospitalized patients with HIV infection and substance use: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(2):156–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.8914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bassett IV, Wilson D, Taaffe J, Freedberg KA. Financial incentives to improve progression through the HIV treatment cascade. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10(6):451–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Silverman K, Holtyn AF, Rodewald AM, et al. Incentives for viral suppression in people living with HIV: a randomized clinical trial. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(9):2337–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02592-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarkin GA, Dunlap LJ, Homsi G. The substance abuse services cost analysis program (SASCAP): a new method for estimating drug treatment services costs. Eval Program Plan. 2004;27(1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2003.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bray JW, Zarkin GA, Miller WR, et al. Measuring economic outcomes of alcohol treatment using the Economic Form 90. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(2):248–55. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2007.68.248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McCollister K, Yang X, Sayed B, French MT, Leff JA, Schackman BR. Monetary conversion factors for economic evaluations of substance use disorders. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;81:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gebo KA, Fleishman JA, Conviser R, et al. Contemporary costs of HIV healthcare in the HAART era. AIDS. 2010;24(17):2705–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833f3c14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holtgrave DR, Wolitski RJ, Pals SL, et al. Cost-utility analysis of the housing and health intervention for homeless and unstably housed persons living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(5):1626–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0204-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Z, Purcell DW, Sansom SL, Hayes D, Hall HI. Vital signs: HIV transmission along the continuum of care—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(11):267–72. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6811e1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Farnham PG, Holtgrave DR, Gopalappa C, Hutchinson AB, Sansom SL. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years saved from HIV prevention in the test and treat era. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 2013;64(2):e15–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a5c8d4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hall HI, Holtgrave DR, Maulsby C. HIV transmission rates from persons living with HIV who are aware and unaware of their infection. AIDS. 2012;26(7):893–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e328351f73f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Airoldi M, Zaccarelli M, Bisi L, et al. One-pill once-a-day HAART: a simplification strategy that improves adherence and quality of life of HIV-infected subjects. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010;4:115–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1093–103. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bingham A, Shrestha RK, Khurana N, Jacobson EU, Farnham PG. Estimated lifetime HIV-related medical costs in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(4):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shrestha RK, Chavez PR, Noble M, et al. Estimating the costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men, United States. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(1): e25445. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. McKenney J, Chen A, Hoover KW, et al. Optimal costs of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6): e0178170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS. Economic evaluation in clinical trials. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 2001;10(8):779–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fenwick E, Marshall DA, Levy AR, Nichol G. Using and interpreting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of management strategies for atrial fibrillation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Krebs E, Enns B, Wang L, et al. Developing a dynamic HIV transmission model for 6 US cities: an evidence synthesis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0217559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Whitham HKHA, Shrestha RK, Kuppermann M, Grund B, Shouse RL, Sansom SL. Health utility estimates and their application to HIV prevention in the United States: implications for cost-effectiveness modeling and future research needs. MDM Policy Pract. 2020;5(2):2381468320936219.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under grants R01AI117065 and T32DA07209.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Orme.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board approved the study. The study was monitored by a Scientific Advisory Committee. Staff members reported all events that might be considered adverse events, including deaths, and the investigators determined if any events met the definitions of adverse events as defined by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board. The investigators, the Scientific Advisory Committee and the Johns. Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board reviewed all adverse events annually. The study team registered the trial on Clinicialtrials.gov before recruitment began (NCT02363387).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunlap, L.J., Orme, S., Zarkin, G.A. et al. Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Incentives for Viral Suppression in People Living with HIV. AIDS Behav 26, 795–804 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03439-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03439-x

Keywords

Navigation