Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HIV Point of Care Testing (PoCT) at Late-Night Sex on Premises Venues (SOPV) for Gay and Bisexual Men and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (GBMSM): A Mixed Methods Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish ‘proof of concept’ for a novel approach to HIV and STI testing at a sex on premises venue (SOPV) for gay and bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) during late night group sex theme parties. A mixed-methods approach was used, and the study aimed to: (1) Build upon existing SOPV funded service delivery and establish ‘proof of concept’ for this unique setting within an SOPV; (2) evaluate the uptake and feasibility/acceptability of routine HIV/STI testing for GBMSM during theme parties in SOPV; and (3) identify beliefs/perceptions regarding this health promotion activity and venue suitability. The characteristics of patrons utilising PoCT (Point of Care Testing) were established to help further reach potentially stigmatised, highly sexually adventurous GBMSM. The findings support further PoCT endeavours within MSM communities to target harder to reach communities to reduce the rate of new transmissions of HIV. Findings can inform future health promotion, screening and interventions, as well as to identify a successful method to engage harder to reach GBMSM that need further focused targeting for HIV and STI testing to reduce transmission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam PC, de Wit JB, Bourne CP, Knox D, Purchas J. Promoting regular testing: an examination of HIV and STI testing routines and associated socio-demographic, behavioural and social-cognitive factors among men who have sex with men in New South Wales, Australia. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(5):921–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McGarrity LA, Huebner DM. Is being out about sexual orientation uniformly healthy? The moderating role of socioeconomic status in a prospective study of gay and bisexual men. Ann Behav Med. 2014;47:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9575-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg ES, Grey JA, Sanchez TH, Sullivan PS. Rates of prevalent HIV infection, prevalent diagnoses, and New diagnoses among men who have sex with men in US States, metropolitan statistical areas, and countries, 2012–2013. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.5684.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirby T, Thornber-Dunwell M. High-risk drug practices tighten grip on London gay scene. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):101–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fazeli PL, Turan JM, Budhwani H, Smith W, Raper JL, Mugavero MJ, Turan B. Moment-to-moment within-person associations between acts of discrimination and internalized stigma in people living with HIV: an experience sampling study. Stigma Health. 2017;2(3):216–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mullens AB, Staunton S, Debattista J, Hamernik E, Gill D. Sex on premises venue (SOPV) health promotion project in response to sustained increases in HIV notifications. Sex Health. 2009;6:41–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett C, Knight V, Knox D, Gray J, Hartmann G, McNulty A. An alternative model of sexually transmissible infection testing in men attending a sex-on-premises venue in Sydney: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Sex Health. 2016;13(4):353–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organisation. Guidance on provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling in health facilities. 2007. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/9789241595568_en.pdf.

  9. Hall I, Holtgrave D, Maulsby C. HIV transmission rates from persons living with HIV who are aware and unaware of their infection. AIDS. 2012;26:893–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischgrund BN, Halkitis PN, Carroll RA. Conceptions of hypermasculinity and mental health states in gay and bisexual men. Psychol Men Masc. 2012;13(2):123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goedel WC, Safren SA, Mayer KH, Duncan DT. Community-level norms and condomless anal intercourse among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications in the Deep South. J HIV/AIDS Soc Serv. 2017;16:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15381501.2017.1344599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grov C, Rendina HJ, Parsons JT. Comparing three cohorts of MSM sampled via sex parties, bars/clubs, and Craigslist.org: implications for researchers and providers. AIDS Edus Preview. 2015;26(4):362–82. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2014.26.4.362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Golub SA, Starks TJ, Payton G, Parsons JT. The critical role of intimacy in the sexual risk behaviors of Gay and Bisexual Men. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(3):626–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-9972-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Li D, Li C, Wang Z, Lau JTF. Prevalence and associated factors of unprotected anal intercourse with regular male sex partners among hiv negative men who have Sex with Men in China: a cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119977. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bourne A, Reid D, Hickson F, Torres-Rueda S, Steinberg P, Weatherburn P. “Chemsex” and harm reduction need among gay men in South London. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26(12):1171–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.07.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mullens, A.B., Ray, M. & Fein, E. ‘Queensland Chemsex Study’: results from a cross sectional survey of gay and other homosexually active men in Queensland–substance use and sexual activity—Industry Report. Retrieved from University of Southern Queensland database, 2017.

  17. Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations. HIV in Australia: 2017. https://www.afao.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/HIV-in-Australia-2017.pdf.

  18. Stevens W, Gous N, Ford N, Scott LE. Feasibility of HIV point-of-care tests for resource-limited settings: challenges and solutions. BMC Med. 2014;12:173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0173-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith DE, Woolley IJ, Russell DB, Bisshop F, Furner V. HIV in practice: current approaches and challenges in the diagnosis, treatment and management of HIV infection in Australia. HIV Med. 2018;19:5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Newcomb ME, Moran K, Feinstein BA, Forscher E, Mustanski B. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use and condomless anal sex: evidence of risk compensation in a cohort of young men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;77(4):358–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Traeger MW, Schroeder SE, Wright EJ, Hellard ME, Cornelisse VJ, Doyle JS, Stoové MA. Effects of Pre-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection on sexual risk behavior in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:676–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lampejo T, Turner R, Roberts C, Allen K, Watson L, Caverley-Frost L, Scott P, Ostridge E, Cooney G, Hardy J, Nulty K. Novel outreach settings to enhance sexually transmitted infection/HIV awareness, diagnosis and treatment in hard-to-reach populations. Int J STD AIDS. 2018;29(3):266–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cunningham P. Point of care (PoCT) testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Australia: in context. Pathology. 2013;45:49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Castel AD, Magnus M, Peterson J, Anand K, Wu C, Matrin M, Sansone M, Rocha N, Jolaosho T, West T, Hader S, Greenberg AE. Implementing a novel citywide rapid HIV testing campaign in Washington, DC: findings and lessons learned. Public Health Rep. 2012;127(4):422–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Debattista J. Health promotion within a sex on premises venue: notes from the field. Int J STD AIDS. 2015;26(14):1017–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mullens AB, Duyker J, Brownlow C, Lemoire J, Daken K, Gow, J. Point-of-care testing (POCT) for HIV/STI among MSM in regional Australia at community ‘beat’ locations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019.

  27. Horwood J, Ingle SM, Burton D, Woodman-Bailey A, Horner P, Jeal N. Sexual health risks, service use, and views of rapid point-of-care testing among men who have sex with men attending saunas: a cross-sectional survey. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27(4):273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mullens AB, Strodl E, Fein E, Stewart L, Daken K. Depression mediates HIV stigma and medication adherence in men who have sex with men (living with HIV). Presentation at the 14th International Congress of Behavioral Medicine: Behavioral Medicine: Making an Impact in the Modern World (ICBM 2016), Melbourne, Australia, 2016.

  29. Ooi C, Lewis D. P4. 22 Crossing the bridge: exploring sexual risk profiles of men who have sex with men attending a sex on premises venue and a public sexual health clinic for sti screening in Sydney, Australia. 2017.

  30. Mutch AJ, Lui CW, Dean J, Mao L, Lemoire J, Debattista J, Howard C, Whittaker A, Fitzgerald L. Increasing HIV testing among hard-to-reach groups: examination of RAPID, a community-based testing service in Queensland, Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Causer LM, Guy RJ, Tabrizi SN, Whiley DM, Speers DJ, Ward J, Tangey A, Badman SG, Gengel B, Natoli LJ, Anderson DA, Wand H, Wilson D, Regan DG, Shephard M, Donovan B, Fairley CK, Anderson DA. Molecular test for chlamydia and gonorrhoea used at point of care in remote primary healthcare settings: a diagnostic test evaluation. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94:340–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown S, Debattista J, Durkin I, Hooper J. Mailed specimen collection for HIV testing in regional Queensland, Australia: a second attempt. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016;40(4):397–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Grov C, Rendina HJ, Breslow AS, Ventuneac A, Adelson S, Parsons JT. Characteristics of men who have sex with men (MSM) who attend sex parties: results from a national online sample in the USA. Sex Trans Infect. 2013;90(1):26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee E, Mao L, Lea T, Williams G, Scott M, Heywood J, O’Connor S, Prestage G, Zablotska I, de Wit J, Holt M. Gay community periodic survey: Queensland 2017. Sydney: Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney. 2018. http://doi.org/10.4225/53/5ad3e2469a4c.

  36. Fonner VA, Dalglish SL, Kennedy CE, Baggaley R, O’Reilly KR, Koechlin FM, Rodolph M, Hodges-Mameletzis I, Grant RM. Effectiveness and safety of oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis for all populations. AIDS London England. 2016;30(12):1973–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mullens AB, Young RM, Dunne MP, Norton G. The amyl nitrite expectancy Questionnaire for men who have sex with men (AEQ-MSM): a measure of substance-related beliefs. Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(13):1642–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mullens AB, Fein E, Young RM, Dunne MP, Norton G, Daken K. Substance-related expectancies among men who have sex with men: development of psychometric tools to predict unprotected sexual activity (SEP-MSM). 2019, under review.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the QPP RAPID peer-testers, patrons, sauna owners and management and venue staff. They would also like to thank the HIV Foundation Queensland who supported this research and made it possible via a Grant (Reference 2017—6). The authors also thank Associate Professor Sonja March, Dr Belinda Goodwin and Dr Rachel King for guidance with data analysis, and Rowena McGregor for assistance with the literature review.

Funding

This study was funded by HIV Foundation Queensland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy B. Mullens.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of University of Southern Queensland (Approval H16REA175) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Patrons


“Thank you for agreeing to participate in this anonymous and confidential phone interview today. I am going to ask you a range of questions regarding your recent testing experience at RAPID (venue name) and other factors associated with the testing environment and the club. Please feel free to decline answering any questions you may not feel comfortable with and asking me any questions as we go along.”

Testing/experience

  1. 1.

    Can you tell me a little bit about your recent RAPID testing experience at (venue name)? (start open ended); and ask and note about additional follow up prompts: staffing, environment, privacy, accessibility

    What did you like about the testing experience; What did you not like so much?

    What motivated you get tested at (venue name)? (or why did you choose to get tested there?)

Acceptability/feasibility

  1. 1.

    Some people find it hard to go and have an HIV test (for a variety of reasons)…Do you think there are any barriers to testing at (venue name)? (provide additional prompts if needed; e.g., uncomfortable talking with GP about sex, or it’s too expensive, or they just can’t seem to find the time.)

  2. 2.

    Are there barriers to testing at other venues (e.g., GP, sexual health clinic; where?/what barriers)? (provide additional prompts if needed; e.g., uncomfortable talking with GP about sex, or it’s too expensive, or they just can’t seem to find the time.)

    If any, can you please describe?;

  3. 3.

    As you are aware RAPID provides testing for HIV and other STI’s at various sites, including outreach setting. Can I ask you which tests you have had at (venue name)?

  4. 4.

    What are the factors (if any) that make it easy or more comfortable for you to get tested for HIV or other STI’s at (venue name)?

  5. 5.

    How does your recent experience at (venue name) differ from your other testing experiences (if you have had other testing experiences)? Was it easier/harder; how so (please describe)?

  6. 6.

    It’s generally considered a good idea for people to test regularly for HIV and other STI’s, so as to stay in control of their health and avoid passing things on to other people. Do you think availability of testing at a place like (venue name) would increase how often you would test? (how so?/why?) Is there another place that you’d prefer to get a test? (where?; why?)

  7. 7.

    Is there anything that would make you more likely to get tested or continue to get tested regularly for HIV and STI’s? (if so, what?; please describe)

Now, I am going to ask some questions in relation to your experiences at (venue name) and similar venues…

Venue environment (and motivations for attending sexual environment):

  1. 1.

    What are the things you like about going to (venue name)?

    From talking to other guys who go there, they go to just get ‘a bit of action’ after they’ve been out for dinner with friends and they’re wanting sex/horny—but at the same time, a lot of guys say they would really like to meet someone and have a great physical connection at the venue. Do you relate to any of these reasons or other ones for visiting the club?

    Why do you think other people visit the club (are there other reasons)? Do you feel like you can relate to their experiences? Do you feel like you have things in common with those people? (may lead to honest responses of how they compartmentalise, stereotype and justify their and others rationale for attending).

  2. 2.

    Do you use alcohol or other party drugs at a (venue name) (or other similar venues)? If so, what do you use? (start open-ended then list specific drugs Y/N: alcohol, crystal/meth, amyl, speed, Ecstasy, GHB, ketamine, cannabis, Viagra, others)

    If, so what might you use on a typical night? (before/during/after party; record details)

  3. 3.

    How do these drugs transform (enhance or limit): (discuss in general, and also seek information specific to separate drugs typically used; and any comments in relation to substance use in combination);

    1. a.

      Your desire or willingness to attend the venue?

    2. b.

      Your experiences at the venue:

      1. i.

        Socially (for example, do you feel like you can talk to people more easily)?

      2. ii.

        Sexual experiences, do you feel increased gratification or a higher level of satisfaction or disinhibition?

    3. c.

      The types of sex you have? (for example, anal sex without condoms)?

    4. d.

      Do you have any other comments on how specific drugs transform your:

      1. i.

        Thoughts?

      2. ii.

        Feelings?

      3. iii.

        Behaviours (including sexual behaviour)?

      4. iv.

        Connection with others (emotionally, sexually)?

      5. v.

        Disinhibition?

  4. 4.

    How are your experiences with alcohol/other party drugs and sex similar or different at (venue name or similar venues) than in other environments…such as when you’re just at home or at ‘beats’? (if so, how?, which drugs?; Note to interviewer: Discussions could generally explore some of the themes if noted among participant: Permissions, expectations and initiations associated with each substance, and how an individual negotiates use in different setting)

    Do you attend venues specifically to engage in ‘chemsex’? (if so, please describe)

  5. 5.

    Are there any strategies you use to reduce harms or risks (and promote resiliency) whilst at the venues in relation to:

    1. a.

      Alcohol and other party drugs?

    2. b.

      Sex?

    3. c.

      Both substance use and sex?

    4. d.

      Do you use PreP, if so, please describe what context and if in conjunction with substance use and/or at (venue name or similar venues)

    5. e.

      Do you use other strategies to reduce risk of HIV or STI’s (such as condoms or any other strategies), if so, please describe what context and if in conjunction with substance use and/or at (venue name or similar venues)

  6. 6.

    Do you have any suggestions regarding ways to reduce harms or risks at the venues re: alcohol or other drug use and/or sex?

  7. 7.

    Now I am going to ask you some general questions regarding you and your background, so that we are able to describe the entire group of people we have interviewed, in a non-identified way; if you feel comfortable answering.

  8. 8.

    Do you have any other thoughts you would like to add in relation to any of the questions or topics discussed?

figure a

Appendix 2: Peer-testers

“Thank you for agreeing to participate in this anonymous and confidential phone interview today. I am going to ask you a range of questions regarding your perceptions as a peer-tester of patrons’ testing experience at RAPID (venue name) and other factors associated with the testing environment and the club. Please feel free to decline answering any questions you may not feel comfortable with and asking me any questions as we go along.”

Testing/experience:

  1. 1.

    Can you tell me a little bit about your perceptions regarding patrons RAPID testing experience at (venue name)? (start open ended); and ask and note about additional follow up prompts: staffing, environment, privacy, accessibility

    What did patrons report that they liked about the testing experience; What did they report to not like so much?

    What did patrons report motivated them get tested at (venue name)?

Acceptability/feasibility

  1. 1.

    Some people find it hard to go and have an HIV test (for a variety of reasons)…Do you think there are any barriers to patrons/MSM testing at (venue name)? (provide additional prompts if needed; e.g., uncomfortable talking with GP about sex, or it’s too expensive, or they just can’t seem to find the time.)

  2. 2.

    Based on reports from patrons, are there barriers to testing at other venues (e.g., GP, sexual health clinic; where?/what barriers)? (provide additional prompts if needed; e.g., uncomfortable talking with GP about sex, or it’s too expensive, or they just can’t seem to find the time.)

    If any, can you please describe?;

  3. 3.

    As you are aware RAPID provides testing for HIV and other STI’s at various sites, including outreach setting. Which tests did were most commonly requested at (venue name)?

  4. 4.

    What are the factors (if any) that make it easy or more comfortable for patrons to get tested for HIV or other STI’s at (venue name), based on their reports?

  5. 5.

    Did clients report if their recent experience at (venue name) differed from their other testing experiences (if they reported to have had other testing experiences, If yes, how so?)? Was it easier/harder; how so (please describe)?

  6. 6.

    It’s generally considered a good idea for people to test regularly for HIV and other STI’s, so as to stay in control of their health and avoid passing things on to other people. Based on reports from patrons’, do you think availability of testing at a place like (venue name) would increase how often MSM patrons would test? (how so?/why?) Is there another place that they’d prefer to get a test? (where?; why?)

  7. 7.

    Based on patron reports, is there anything that would make MSM attending SOPVs more likely to get tested or continue to get tested regularly for HIV and STI’s? (if so, what?; please describe)

“Now, I am going to ask some questions in relation to your perceptions of experiences at (venue name) and similar venues, based on their reports…”

Venue environment (and motivations for attending sexual environment):

  1. 1.

    What are the things they like about going to (venue name)?

    From talking to other guys who go there, they go to just get ‘a bit of action’ after they’ve been out for dinner with friends and they’re wanting sex/horny—but at the same time, a lot of guys say they would really like to meet someone and have a great physical connection at the venue. Have patrons reported to you any of these reasons or other ones for visiting the club?

  2. 2.

    Do you observe patrons using alcohol or other party drugs at a (venue name or appear to be under the influence of substances?)? If so, what substance use has been observed or reported? (start open-ended then list specific drugs Y/N: alcohol, crystal/meth, amyl, speed, Ecstasy, GHB, ketamine, cannabis, Viagra, others)

  3. 3.

    What are your perceptions as a peer-tester regarding how these drugs transform (enhance or limit): (discuss in general, and also seek information specific to separate drugs typically used; and any comments in relation to substance use in combination)—based on your role in the health promotion project and patron reports;

    1. a.

      MSM desire or willingness to attend the venue?

    2. b.

      MSM experiences at the venue:

      1. i.

        Socially

      2. ii.

        Sexual experiences

    3. c.

      The types of sex patrons report (in pre-testing discussions)? (for example, anal sex without condoms)?

    4. d.

      Do you have any other comments on how specific drugs transform experiences among MSM at the SOPV, as reported by clients?

      1. i.

        Thoughts?

      2. ii.

        Feelings?

      3. iii.

        Behaviours (including sexual behaviour)?

      4. iv.

        Connection with others (emotionally, sexually)?

      5. v.

        Disinhibition?

  4. 4.

    Do you have any suggestions regarding ways to reduce harms or risks at the venues re: alcohol or other drug use and/or sex?

    1. e.

      Alcohol and other party drugs?

    2. f.

      Sex?

    3. g.

      Both substance use and sex?

    4. h.

      How frequently to patrons report use of PreP, if they have, please describe what contexts and if in conjunction with substance use and/or at (venue name or similar venues)

    5. i.

      Do patrons report any other strategies to reduce risk of HIV or STI’s (such as condoms or any other strategies), if so, please describe what context and if in conjunction with substance use and/or at (venue name or similar venues)

  5. 5.

    Are there any strategies patrons report to reduce harms or risks (and promote resiliency) whilst at the venues in relation to:

  6. 6.

    Now I am going to ask you some general questions regarding you and your background, so that we are able to describe the entire group of people we have interviewed, in a non-identified way; if you feel comfortable answering.

  7. 7.

    Do you have any other thoughts you would like to add in relation to any of the questions or topics discussed?

figure b

Length of time assisting on the project:

Number of shifts as a peer-tester:

Length of time at RAPID as a peer-tester:

Appendix 3

Country of birth list (other)

Country, N = 62

n (%)

Bosnia

2 (1.0%)

Brazil

5 (2.4%)

China

7 (3.4%)

Croatia

1 (0.5%)

El Salvador

3 (1.4%)

England

1 (0.5%)

Fiji

5 (2.4%)

France

1 (0.5%)

Germany

1 (0.5%)

Hong Kong

1 (0.5%)

India

4 (1.9%)

Japan

1 (0.5%)

Kiribati

1 (0.5%)

Korea

1 (0.5%)

Malaysia

3 (1.4%)

Peru

1 (0.5%)

Philippines

5 (2.4%)

Papua New Guinea

3 (1.4%)

Samoa

1 (0.5%)

Scotland

1 (0.5%)

Singapore

4 (1.9%)

Slovakia

1 (0.5%)

Sri Lanka

1 (0.5%)

United Kingdom

4 (1.9%)

United States of America

1 (0.5%)

Venezuela

1 (0.5%)

Vietnam

1 (0.5%)

Zimbabwe

1 (0.5%)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mullens, A.B., Daken, K., Lemoire, J. et al. HIV Point of Care Testing (PoCT) at Late-Night Sex on Premises Venues (SOPV) for Gay and Bisexual Men and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (GBMSM): A Mixed Methods Analysis. AIDS Behav 24, 450–466 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02500-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02500-0

Keywords

Navigation