Skip to main content
Log in

Social Cohesion Among Sex Workers and Client Condom Refusal in a Canadian Setting: Implications for Structural and Community-Led Interventions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community empowerment can be a powerful determinant of HIV risk among sex workers (SWs). This study modeled the impact of social cohesion on client condom refusal among SWs in Vancouver. Longitudinal data were drawn from a prospective cohort of SWs (2010–2013). Lippman and colleagues’ Social Cohesion Scale measured SWs’ connectedness (i.e., perception of mutual aid, trust, support). Multivariable logistic regression examined the independent effect of social cohesion on client condom refusal. Of 654 SWs, 22 % reported baseline client condom refusal and 34 % over 3 years. The baseline median social cohesion score was 24 (IQR 20–29, range 4–45). In the final confounding model, for every one-point increase in the social cohesion score, average odds of condom refusal decreased by 3 % (AOR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.95–0.99). Community empowerment can have a direct protective effect on HIV risk. These findings highlight the need for a legal framework that enables collectivization and SW-led efforts in the HIV response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections for sex workers in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva. 2012; http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/sex_worker/en/index.html. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  2. Baral S, Beyrer C, Muessig K, et al. Burden of HIV among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(7):538–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shannon K, Goldenberg SM, Deering KN, Strathdee S. HIV infection among female sex workers in concentrated and high prevalence epidemics: why a structural determinants framework is needed. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014;9(2):174–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Krüsi A, Chettiar J, Ridgway A, Abbott J, Strathdee SA, Shannon K. Negotiating safety and sexual risk reduction with clients in unsanctioned safer indoor sex work environments: a qualitative study. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(6):1154–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Deering K, Amin A, Shoveller J, et al. A systematic review of the global magnitude and drivers of violence against sex workers. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(5):e42–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Aggleton P, Wood K, Malcolm A, Parker R. HIV-related stigma, discrimination and human rights violations: case studies of successful programmes. Geneva. 2005; http://data.unaids.org/UNA-docs/JC999-HRViolations_en.pdf. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  7. Beeker C, Guenther-Grey C, Raj A. Community empowerment paradigm drift and the primary prevention of HIV/AIDS. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(7):831–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell C, Nair Y, Maimane S. Building contexts that support effective community responses to HIV/AIDS: a South African case study. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39(3–4):347–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker RG. Empowerment, community mobilization and social change in the face of HIV/AIDS. AIDS. 1996;10(Suppl 3):S27–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerrigan DL, Fonner VA, Stromdahl S, Kennedy CE. Community empowerment among female sex workers is an effective HIV prevention intervention: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed evidence from low- and middle-income countries. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):1926–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Erausquin JT, Biradavolu M, Reed E, Burroway R, Blankenship KM. Trends in condom use among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India: the impact of a community mobilisation intervention. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(Suppl 2):ii49–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanchard AK, Mohan HL, Shahmanesh M, et al. Community mobilization, empowerment and HIV prevention among female sex workers in south India. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Guha M, Baschieri A, Bharat S, et al. Risk reduction and perceived collective efficacy and community support among female sex workers in Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, India: the importance of context. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(Suppl 2):55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kerrigan D, Wirtz A, Baral S, et al. The global HIV epidemics among sex workers. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. 2013; http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/GlobalHIVEpidemicsAmongSexWorkers.pdf. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  15. Evans C, Jana S, Lambert H. What makes a structural intervention? Reducing vulnerability to HIV in community settings, with particular reference to sex work. Glob Public Health. 2010;5(5):449–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta GR, Parkhurst JO, Ogden JA, Aggleton P, Mahal A. Structural approaches to HIV prevention. Lancet. 2008;372(9640):764–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerrigan D, Kennedy CE, Morgan-Thomas R, et al. A community empowerment approach to the HIV response among sex workers: effectiveness, challenges, and considerations for implementation and scale-up. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):172–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kerrigan D, Moreno L, Rosario S, et al. Environmental-structural interventions to reduce HIV/STI risk among female sex workers in the Dominican Republic. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(1):120–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Argento E, Reza-Paul S, Lorway R, et al. Confronting structural violence in sex work: lessons from a community-led HIV prevention project in Mysore India. AIDS Care. 2011;23(1):69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Halli SS, Ramesh BM, O’Neil J, et al. The role of collectives in STI and HIV/AIDS prevention among female sex workers in Karnataka India. AIDS Care. 2006;18(7):739–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lippman S, Donini A, Díaz J. Social-environmental factors and protective sexual behavior among sex workers: the Encontros intervention in Brazil. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S216–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fonner VA, Kerrigan D, Mnisi Z, Ketende S, Kennedy CE, Baral S. Social cohesion, social participation, and HIV related risk among female sex workers in Swaziland. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Blankenship KM, West BS, Kershaw TS, Biradavolu MR. Power, community mobilization, and condom use practices among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh India. AIDS. 2008;22(Suppl 5):S109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Basu I, Jana S, Rotheram-borus MJ, et al. HIV prevention among sex workers in India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36(3):845–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jana S, Basu I, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Newman PA. The Sonagachi Project: a sustainable community intervention program. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(5):405–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferris S. Street sex work and canadian cities: resisting a dangerous order. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Government of Canada Department of Justice. Technical Paper: Bill C-36, Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act. Ottawa. 2015; http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/protect/p1.html. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  28. Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Goldenberg SM, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV among female sex workers: influence of structural determinants. Lancet. 2015;385:55–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Shannon K, Bright V, Allinott S, Alexson D, Gibson K, Tyndall MW. Community-based HIV prevention research among substance-using women in survival sex work: the Maka Project Partnership. Harm Reduct J. 2007;4(1):20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Stueve A, Duran R, Doval AS, Blome J. Time-space sampling in minority communities: results with young Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):922–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kerrigan D, Telles P, Torres H, Overs C, Castle C. Community development and HIV/STI-related vulnerability among female sex workers in Rio de Janeiro Brazil. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(1):137–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Duff P, Shoveller J, Dobrer S, et al. The relationship between social, policy and physical venue features and social cohesion on condom use for pregnancy prevention among sex workers: a safer indoor work environment scale. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015. doi:10.1136/jech-2014-204427.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ristock J, Zoccole A, Passante L. Aboriginal two-spirit and LGBTQ migration, mobility and health research project: final report. Winnipeg. 2010; http://www.2spirits.com/PDFolder/MMHReport.pdf. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  34. Rothman K, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rhodes T, Simic M, Baros S, Platt L, Zikic B. Police violence and sexual risk among female and transvestite sex workers in Serbia: qualitative study. BMJ. 2008;337(7669):560–3.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wojcicki JM, Malala J. Condom use, power and HIV/AIDS risk: sex-workers bargain for survival in Hillbrow/Joubert Park/Berea Johannesburg. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(1):99–121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Urada LA, Morisky DE, Hernandez LI, Strathdee SA. Social and structural factors associated with consistent condom use among female entertainment workers trading sex in the Philippines. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(2):523–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ang A, Morisky DE. A multilevel analysis of the impact of socio-structural and environmental influences on condom use among female sex workers. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(4):934–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yi H, Zheng T, Wan Y, Mantell JE, Park M, Csete J. Occupational safety and HIV risk among female sex workers in China: a mixed-methods analysis of sex-work harms and mommies. Glob Public Health. 2012;7(8):840–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kerrigan D, Ellen JM, Moreno L, et al. Environmental-structural factors significantly associated with consistent condom use among female sex workers in the Dominican Republic. AIDS. 2003;17(3):415–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Deering K, Lyons T, Feng CX, et al. Client demands for unsafe sex: the socioeconomic risk environment for HIV among street and off-street sex workers. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(4):522–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Johnston CL, Callon C, Li K, Wood E, Kerr T. Offer of financial incentives for unprotected sex in the context of sex work. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(2):144–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Choi SYP, Holroyd E. The influence of power, poverty and agency in the negotiation of condom use for female sex workers in mainland China. Cult Health Sex. 2007;9(5):489–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pando MA, Coloccini RS, Reynaga E, et al. Violence as a barrier for HIV prevention among female sex workers in Argentina. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Shannon K, Csete J. Violence, condom negotiation, and HIV/STI risk among Sex workers. JAMA. 2010;304(5):573–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lau JTF, Gu J, Tsui HY, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of condom use during commercial sex by female sex workers who were or were not injecting drug users in China. Sex Health. 2012;9(4):368–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shannon K, Kerr T, Allinott S, et al. Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(4):911–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bourgois P, Prince B, Moss A. The everyday violence of hepatitis C among young women who inject drugs in San Francisco. Hum Organ. 2004;63(3):253–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Shannon K, Kerr T, Strathdee S, Shoveller J, Montaner J, Tyndall M. Prevalence and structural correlates of gender based violence among a prospective cohort of female sex workers. BMJ. 2009. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2939.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sanders T. Sex work: a risky business. Portland: Willian Publishing; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Decker MR, Crago AL, Chu SKH, et al. Human rights violations against sex workers: burden and effect on HIV. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):186–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Krüsi A, Pacey K, Bird L, et al. Criminalisation of clients: reproducing vulnerabilities for violence and poor health among street-based sex workers in Canada—a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6):e005191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Small W, Kerr T, Charette J, et al. Impacts of intensified police activity on injection drug users: evidence from an ethnographic investigation. Int J Drug Policy. 2006;17(2):85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Werb D, Wood E, Small W, et al. Effects of police confiscation of illicit drugs and syringes among injection drug users in Vancouver. Int J Drug Policy. 2008;19(4):332–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Goldenberg S, Chettiar J, Simo A, et al. Early sex work initiation independently elevates odds of HIV infection and police arrest among adult sex workers in a Canadian setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65(1):122–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Crago AL. Arrest the violence: human rights abuses against sex workers in central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Open Society Foundation & Sex Workers’ Rights Advocacy Network, 2009; http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/arrest-violence-human-rights-violations-against-sex-workers-11-countries-central-and-eastern. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  57. Simić M, Rhodes T. Violence, dignity and HIV vulnerability: street sex work in Serbia. Sociol Health Illn. 2009;31(1):1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Shannon K, Montaner JSG. The politics and policies of HIV prevention in sex work. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(7):500–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Supreme Court of Canada. Canada (Attorney General) vs. Bedford. Ottawa SCC 72, 2013; S.C.R. 1101. http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13389/index.do. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  60. Vancouver Police Department. Sex work enforcement guidelines. Vancouver, 2013. http://vancouver.ca/police/assets/pdf/reports-policies/sex-enforcement-guidelines.pdf. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  61. Scoular J. Current developments: criminalising “Punters”: evaluating the Swedish position on prostitution. J Soc Welf Fam Law. 2004;26(2):195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Global Commission on HIV and the Law. Risks, Rights & Health. New York, 2012; http://www.hivlawcommission.org/. Accessed 30 Sep 2015.

  63. Bruckert C, Hannem S. Rethinking the prostitution debates: transcending structural stigma in systemic responses to sex work. Can J Law Soc. 2013;28(1):43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Jeffrey LA, Sullivan B. Canadian sex work policy for the 21st century: enhancing rights and safety, lessons from Australia. Can Polit Sci Rev. 2009;3(1):57–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all those who contributed their time and expertise to this project, including participants, partner agencies and the AESHA Community Advisory Board. We wish to acknowledge Peter Vann, Gina Willis, Sarah Allan, Annick Simo, Sabina Dobrer, Ofer Amram, Jill Chettiar, Jennifer Morris, and Kathleen Deering for their research and administrative support. This work is supported by operating grants from the US National Institutes of Health (R01DA028648) and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (HHP-98835). KS is supported by US National Institutes of Health (R01DA028648), Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. SAS is supported by a NIDA MERIT award (R37DA019829).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Shannon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Argento, E., Duff, P., Bingham, B. et al. Social Cohesion Among Sex Workers and Client Condom Refusal in a Canadian Setting: Implications for Structural and Community-Led Interventions. AIDS Behav 20, 1275–1283 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1230-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1230-8

Keywords

Navigation