Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Behavioral Economics Matters for HIV Research: The Impact of Behavioral Biases on Adherence to Antiretrovirals (ARVs)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioral economics (BE) has been used to study a number of health behaviors such as smoking and drug use, but there is little knowledge of how these insights relate to HIV prevention and care. We present novel evidence on the prevalence of the common behavioral decision-making errors of present-bias, overoptimism, and information salience among 155 Ugandan HIV patients, and analyze their association with subsequent medication adherence. 36 % of study participants are classified as present-biased, 21 % as overoptimistic, and 34 % as having salient HIV information. Patients displaying present-bias were 13 % points (p = 0.006) less likely to have adherence rates above 90 %, overoptimistic clients were 9 % points (p = 0.04) less likely, and those not having salient HIV information were 17 % points (p < 0.001) less likely. These findings indicate that BE may be used to screen for future adherence problems and to better design and target interventions addressing these behavioral biases and the associated suboptimal adherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charness G, Gneezy U. Incentives to exercise. Econometrica. 2009;77(3):909–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heil S, Higgins S, Bernstein I, et al. Effects of voucher-based incentives on abstinence from cigarette smoking and fetal growth among pregnant women. Addiction. 2008;103:1009–18.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barsky R, Juster T, Kimball M, Shapiro M. Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Q J Econ. 1997;112(2):537–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185(4157):1124–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47(2):263–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit. 2002;14:351–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thaler R, Sunstein C. Libertarian paternalism. Am Econ Rev. 2003;93(2):175–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loewenstein G, Brennan T, Volpp K. Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behaviors. JAMA. 2007;298(20):2415–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rice T. The behavioral economics of health and health care. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2013;34:431–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gebhardt W, Maes S. Integrating social-psychological frameworks for health behavior research. Am J Health Behav. 2001;25:528–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Janz N, Becker M. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Behav. 1984;11(1):1–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Armitage C, Conner M. Social cognition models and health behavior: a structured review. Psychol Health. 2000;15:173–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ariely D. Predictably irrational. New York: Harper Collins; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Préau M, Apostolidis T, Francois C, Raffi F, Spire B. Time perspective and quality of life among HIV-infected patients in the context of HAART. AIDS Care. 2007;19(4):449–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McHorney C. The adherence estimator: a brief, proximal screener for patient propensity to adhere to prescription medications for chronic disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(1):215–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Donoghue T, Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Am Econ Rev. 1999;89(1):103–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Benartzi S. Save more tomorrow. New York: Pengiun; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moore D, Healy P. The trouble with overconfidence. Psychol Rev. 2008;115(2):502–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palm R, Hodgson M. After a California Earthquake: attitude and behavior change. The University of Chicago Geography Research Paper No. 233; 1992.

  21. Coller M, Williams M. Eliciting individual discount rates. Exp Econ. 1999;2:107–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cameron L, Shah M. Risk-taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. J Hum Resour. 2015;50(12):484–515.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arnsten J, Demas P, Farzadegan H, et al. Antiretroviral therapy adherence and viral suppression in HIV-infected drug users: comparison of self-report and electronic monitoring. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1417–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bangsberg D, Ware N, Simoni J. Adherence without access to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa? AIDS. 2006;20:140–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Turner B. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy by human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:S143–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Raffa J, Tossonian H, Grebely J, Petkau J, DeVlaming S, Conway B. Intermediate highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence thresholds and empirical models for the development of drug resistance mutations. J AIDS. 2008;47(3):397–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scanlon M, Vreeman R. Current strategies for improving access and adherence to antiretroviral therapies in resource-limited settings. HIV/AIDS–Res Palliat Care. 2013;5:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fogarty L, Roter D, Larson S, Burke J, Gillespie J, Levy R. Patient adherence to HIV medication regimens: a review of published and abstract reports. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46(2):93–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mildmay Clinic under the leadership of Dr. Barbara Mukasa and study coordinator Tonny Kizza for their invaluable help in implementing the study. Thanks to Dr. Glenn Wagner, Dr. Arleen Leibowitz and Dr. Tom Rice for comments on an early draft, and two referees for insightful comments. Our gratitude goes most importantly to the study participants who gave so generously of their time and insights. This project was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Grant Number R34MH096609. Sebastian Linnemayr is the principal investigator for the NIMH grant, and organized and coordinated the data collection efforts at the Mildmay Clinic in Kampala, Uganda. Both authors contributed equally to the data analyses and writing the paper. In memory of Esther Kawuma who made this study possible and who will be dearly missed by the RAND team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Linnemayr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linnemayr, S., Stecher, C. Behavioral Economics Matters for HIV Research: The Impact of Behavioral Biases on Adherence to Antiretrovirals (ARVs). AIDS Behav 19, 2069–2075 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1076-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1076-0

Keywords

Navigation