Abstract
We explored anticipated and actual reactions to receiving HIV positive results through self-testing with a diverse group of 84 gay and bisexual men in New York City. Grounded Theory was used to investigate these reactions in a two-phase study, one hypothetical, followed by a practical phase in which self-tests were distributed and used. Three major themes emerged when participants were asked about their anticipated reactions to an HIV positive self-test result: managing emotional distress, obtaining HIV medical care, and postponing sexual activity. When participants were asked about their anticipated reactions to a partner’s HIV positive self-test result, five themes emerged: provide emotional support; refrain from engaging in sex with casual partner; avoid high-risk sexual activity with both main and casual partners; seek medical services; and obtain a confirmatory test result. Although none of the participants tested positive, seven of their partners did. Participants provided emotional support and linked their partners to support services. The availability of HIV self-testing kits offers potential opportunities to tackle HIV infection among individuals with high-risk practices.
Resumen
Exploramos las reacciones anticipadas y que ocurrieron al recibir un resultado de VIH positivo con el uso de la prueba de auto test de VIH en un grupo diverso de 84 hombres gay y bisexuales en la ciudad de Nueva York. Usamos la Teoría Fundamental para investigar estas reacciones en un estudio de dos fases, una fase hipotética, y la otra práctica en la cual las pruebas de auto test de VIH fueron distribuidas y usadas. Tres temas generales surgieron cuando le preguntamos a los participantes acerca de cómo ellos reaccionarían a un resultado positivo como resultado del uso de la prueba de auto test de VIH: brindar apoyo emocional, buscar atención médica para el VIH, y evitar la actividad sexual. En cuanto a sus reacciones en caso de que su pareja recibiera un resultado positivo, hubo cinco temas: brindar apoyo emocional; evitar la actividad sexual riesgosa con la pareja casual; participar en actividades sexuales no riesgosas con la pareja principal y casual; conectar a la pareja con servicios médicos; y el deseo de obtener una prueba confirmatoria para el VIH. Aunque ninguno de los participantes resultó ser positivo, siete de sus parejas sí recibieron resultados positivos. Los participantes que se encontraron en esta situación hablaron de cómo brindar apoyo emocional y conectar a la pareja con servicios de apoyo. La disponibilidad de la prueba casera ofrece oportunidades para abordar la infección del HIV en individuos con prácticas de alto riesgo.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roehr B. FDA approves “instant” HIV home test for use over the counter. BMJ. 2012;345(7865):5.
David Paltiel A, Walensky RP. Home HIV testing: good news but not a game changer. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(10):744–6.
Whitmore SK, Kann L, Prejean J, Koenig LJ, Branson BM, Hall HI, et al. Vital signs: HIV infection, testing, and risk behaviors among youths United States. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(47):971–6.
Cohen MS, Holmes C, Padian N, Wolf M, Hirnschall G, Lo Y-R, et al. HIV treatment as prevention: how scientific discovery occurred and translated rapidly into policy for the global response. Health Aff. 2012;31(7):1439–49.
Cozac D. Global: clinical trial shows dramatic reduction in transmission of HIV as a result of treatment. HIV/AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2011;15(3):31–2.
Walensky RP, Paltiel AD. Rapid HIV testing at home: does it solve a problem or create one? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(6):459–62.
Whellams M. The approval of over-the-counter HIV tests: playing fair when making the rules. J Bus Ethics. 2008;77(1):5–15.
Paltiel AD, Pollack HA. Price, performance, and the FDA approval process: the example of home HIV testing. Med Decis Mak. 2010;30(2):217–23.
Walensky RP, Freedberg KA, Weinstein MC, Paltiel AD. Cost-effectiveness of HIV testing and treatment in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:S248–54.
Ibitoye M, Frasca T, Giguere R, Carballo-Diéguez A. Home testing past, present and future: lessons learned and implications for HIV home tests. AIDS Behav. 2013;18(5):933–49.
Frasca T, Balan I, Ibitoye M, Valladares J, Dolezal C, Carballo-Diéguez A. Attitude and behavior changes among gay and bisexual men after use of rapid home HIV tests to screen sexual partners. AIDS Behav. 2013;. doi:10.1007/s10461-013-0630-x.
Bayer R, Stryker J, Smith MD. Testing for HIV infection at home. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(19):1296–9.
Lowell M. Consumer trends in self diagnosis, home testing and over the counter medication: implications for the registered nurse. Kans Nurse. 1995;70(5):1–2.
Patel P, Bennett B, Sullivan T, Parker MM, Heffelfinger JD, Sullivan PS. Rapid HIV screening: missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis and prevention. J Clin Virol. 2012;54(1):42–7.
Kyaddondo D, Wanyenze RK, Kinsman J, Hardon A. Home-based HIV counseling and testing: client experiences and perceptions in Eastern Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1–10.
Kingsley LA, Lyteh DW, Valdiserri RO. The HIV antibody test: why gay and bisexual men want or do not want to know their results. Public Health Rep. 1987;102(5):468–74.
DeNyse A. CDC: progress made in HIV care/treatment, yet continued efforts needed. Infect Dis News. 2012;25(1):8.
Greacen T, Friboulet D, Blachier A, Fugon L, Hefez S, Lorente N, et al. Internet-using men who have sex with men would be interested in accessing authorised HIV self-tests available for purchase online (English). AIDS Care (Print). 2013;25(1–2):49–54.
Bavinton BR, Brown G, Hurley M, Bradley J, Keen P, Conway DP, et al. Which gay men would increase their frequency of HIV testing with home self-testing? AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2084–92. doi:10.1007/s10461-013-0450-z.
Sullivan PS, Carballo-Diéguez A, Coates T, Goodreau SM, McGowan I, Sanders EJ, et al. Successes and challenges of HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):388–99.
Carballo-Dieguez A, Frasca T, Balan I, Ibitoye M, Dolezal C. Use of a rapid HIV home test prevents HIV exposure in a high risk sample of men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2012;15:15.
Brothers KB. Dependent rational providers. J Med Philos. 2011;36(2):133–47.
Prosser AT, Tang T, Hall HI. HIV in persons born outside the United States, 2007–2010. JAMA. 2012;308(6):601–7.
Purcell DW, Johnson CH, Lansky A, Prejean J, Stein R, Denning P, et al. Estimating the population size of men who have sex with men in the United States to obtain HIV and syphilis rates. Open AIDS J. 2012;6:98–107.
Carballo-Dieguez A, Frasca T, Dolezal C, Balan I. Will gay and bisexually active men at high risk of infection use over-the-counter rapid HIV tests to screen sexual partners? J Sex Res. 2012;49(4):379–87. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.647117.
Bilardi JE, Walker S, Read T, Prestage G, Chen MY, Guy R, et al. Gay and bisexual men’s views on rapid self-testing for HIV. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2093–9.
Wei C, Yan H, Yang C, Raymond HF, Li J, Yang H, et al. Accessing HIV testing and treatment among men who have sex with men in China: a qualitative study. AIDS Care. 2014;26(3):372–8.
Carey MP, Schroder KE. Development and psychometric evaluation of the brief HIV Knowledge Questionnaire. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(2):172–82.
Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Cambridge: Aldine; 1968.
Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage; 1998.
Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (with CD-ROM). Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2006.
Sharma A, Sullivan PS, Khosropour CM. Willingness to take a free home HIV test and associated factors among internet-using men who have sex with men. JIAPAC. 2011;10(6):357–64.
Wayal S, Llewellyn C, Smith H, Fisher M. Home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections: preferences and concerns of men who have sex with men. Cult Health Sex. 2011;13(3):343–53.
Myers JE, El-Sadr WM, Zerbe A, Branson BM. Rapid HIV self-testing: long in coming but opportunities beckon. AIDS. 2013;27(11):1687–95.
Kimbrough LW, Fisher HE, Jones KT, Johnson W, Thadiparthi S, Dooley S. Accessing social networks with high rates of undiagnosed HIV infection: the social networks demonstration project. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(6):1093–9.
Martinez O, Roth AM, Kelle G, Downs M, Rhodes SD. Adaptation and implementation of HoMBReS: a community-level, evidence-based HIV behavioral intervention for heterosexual Latino men in the midwestern United States. AIDS Educ Prev. 2014;26(1):68–80.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Grant from NIMH (R01 MH79692) to Alex Carballo-Diéguez, Ph.D., Principal Investigator. Additional support came from the National Institute of Mental Health to the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at NY State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University (T32-MH19139; Principal Investigator: Theo Sandfort, Ph.D.). The authors are extremely thankful to participants who volunteered their time and candidly expressed their opinions on very intimate topics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinez, O., Carballo-Diéguez, A., Ibitoye, M. et al. Anticipated and Actual Reactions to Receiving HIV Positive Results Through Self-Testing Among Gay and Bisexual Men. AIDS Behav 18, 2485–2495 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0790-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0790-3