Abstract
Men who have sex with men (MSM) throughout the world are at high-risk of HIV acquisition and transmission. Although individual behavior remains a central feature of HIV prevention efforts in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond, contextual factors likely influence behavioral risk. We identify contextual factors at the individual, dyadic (within the partnership), and extra-dyadic (relationships external to the focal dyad) levels that are associated with increased rates of unprotected anal intercourse with a given male partner among MSM in Soweto, South Africa. Drawing on data from The Soweto Men’s Study, multilevel models were applied to 758 partnerships nested within 377 MSM respondents. Independent of overall sexual engagement, dyadic (e.g. description of partner as ‘regular’), psychosocial (e.g. experiences of homonegativity), and sociocultural (e.g. income) contextual factors were significant predictors of differential 6-month rates of UAI with a given partner. By contrast, sexual partnerships outside of the focal sexual pair were not significantly related to UAI rates within the focal pair. Our findings support the need for continuing to understand and intervene on partner-level, psychosocial, and sociocultural dimensions of sexual behavior and sexual risk among MSM in Soweto.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, Beyrer C. Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000–2006: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007;4(12):e339.
Beyrer C, Baral SD, Walker D, Wirtz AL, Johns B, Sifakis F. The expanding epidemics of HIV type 1 among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries: diversity and consistency. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):137–51.
Dahoma M, Johnston LG, Holman A, Miller LA, Mussa M, Othman A, et al. HIV and related risk behavior among men who have sex with men in Zanzibar, Tanzania: results of a behavioral surveillance survey. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(1):186–92.
Lane T, Raymond H, Dladla S, Rasethe J, Struthers H, McFarland W, et al. High HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men in Soweto, South Africa: results from The Soweto Men’s Study. AIDS Behav. 2009. doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9598-y.
Merrigan M, Azeez A, Afolabi B, Chabikuli ON, Onyekwena O, Eluwa G, et al. HIV prevalence and risk behaviours among men having sex with men in Nigeria. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(1):65–70.
Wade AS, Larmarange J, Diop AK, Diop O, Gueye K, Marra A, et al. Reduction in risk-taking behaviors among MSM in Senegal between 2004 and 2007 and prevalence of HIV and other STIs. ELIHoS Project, ANRS 12139. AIDS Care. 2010;22(4):409–14.
Rispel LC, Metcalf CA, Cloete A, Reddy V, Lombard C. HIV prevalence and risk practices among men who have sex with men in two South African cities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57(1):69–76.
Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(6):1007–19.
Baral S, Trapence G, Motimedi F, Umar E, Iipinge S, Dausab F, et al. HIV prevalence, risks for HIV infection, and human rights among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4997.
Fay H, Baral SD, Trapence G, Motimedi F, Umar E, Iipinge S, et al. Stigma, health care access, and HIV knowledge among men who have sex with men in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(6):1088–97.
Lane T, Mogale T, Struthers H, McIntyre J, Kegeles SM. “They see you as a different thing”: the experiences of men who have sex with men with healthcare workers in South African township communities. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(6):430–3.
Lane T, Raymond H, Dladla S, Rasethe J, Struthers H, McFarland W, et al., editors. High HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men in a South African township community: preliminary results from the Soweto Men’s study. Durban: 4th South African AIDS Conference; 2009.
Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR. The Bernoulli-process model of HIV transmission: applications and implications. In: Holtgrave DR, editor. Handbook of economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs. New York: Plenum Press; 1998. p. 13–32.
Pinkerton SD, Chesson HW, Layde PM, et al. Utility of behavioral changes as markers of sexually transmitted disease risk reduction in sexually transmitted disease/HIV prevention trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;31:71–9.
Kippax S, Slavin S, Ellard J, Hendry O, Richters J, Grulich A, et al. Seroconversion in context. AIDS Care. 2003;15(6):839–52.
Korner H, Hendry O, Kippax S. It’s not just condoms: social contexts of unsafe sex in gay men’s narratives of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Health Risk Soc. 2005;7(1):47–62.
Adam B, Sears A, Schellenberg E. Accounting for unsafe sex: interviews with men who have sex with men. J Sex Res. 2000;37(1):24–36.
Adam P, Teva I, de Wit J. Balancing risk and pleasure: sexual self-control as a moderator of the influence of sexual desires on sexual risk-taking in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;8(4):463–7.
Beyrer C, Trapence G, Motimedi F, Umar E, Iipinge S, Dausab F, et al. Bisexual concurrency, bisexual partnerships, and HIV among Southern African men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(4):323–7.
Mattson CL, Bailey RC, Muga R, Poulussen R, Onyango T. Acceptability of male circumcision and predictors of circumcision preference among men and women in Nyanza Province, Kenya. AIDS Care. 2005;17(2):182.
Westercamp M, Agot KE, Ndinya-Achola J, Bailey RC. Circumcision preference among women and uncircumcised men prior to scale-up of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Kisumu, Kenya. AIDS Care. 2012;24(12):157–66.
Diaz RM, Ayala G, Bein E. Sexual risk as an outcome of social oppression: data from a probability sample of Latino gay men in three U.S. cities. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2004;10(3):255–67.
Kegeles SM, Hays RB, Coates TJ. The Mpowerment project: a community-level HIV prevention intervention for young gay men. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8 Pt 1):1129–36.
Wolfinger R, O’Connell M. Generalized linear mixed models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simul. 1993;48:233–43.
Venables W, Ripley B. Modern applied statistics with S. New York: Springer; 2002.
Acknowledgments
The Soweto Men’s Study was funded by a grant to Dr. Lane from the National Institute of Mental Health, 5K01MH074369, and by a grant to the UCSF AIDS Research Institute from the the Hurlbut-Johnson Fund of the Peninsula Community Foundation (USA). HIV testing and treatment for participants in the Soweto Men’s Study was supported by the Perinatal HIV Research Unit in Johannesburg, South Africa, with funds from the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The authors’ would like to thank the reviewers of this article for their insightful and useful feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnold, M.P., Struthers, H., McIntyre, J. et al. Contextual Correlates of Per Partner Unprotected Anal Intercourse Rates Among MSM in Soweto, South Africa. AIDS Behav 17 (Suppl 1), 4–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0324-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0324-9