Skip to main content
Log in

Barrier Method Preferences and Perceptions Among Zimbabwean Women and their Partners

  • Barrier Methods of Prevention
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In Zimbabwe, adult HIV prevalence is over 25% and acceptable prevention methods are urgently needed. Sixty-eight Zimbabwean women who had completed a barrier-methods study and 34 of their male partners participated in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews to qualitatively explore acceptability of male condoms, female condoms and diaphragms. Most men and about half of women preferred diaphragms because they are female-controlled and do not detract from sexual pleasure or carry stigma. Unknown efficacy and reuse were concerns and some women reported feeling unclean when leaving the diaphragm in for six hours following sex. Nearly half of women and some men preferred male condoms because they are effective and limit women's exposure to semen, although they reportedly detract from sexual pleasure and carry social stigma. Female condoms were least preferred because of obviousness and partial coverage of outer-genitalia that interfered with sexual pleasure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • AIDS Epidemic Update 2003. (2003). Geneva: © Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization (WHO) 2003.

  • Bulut, A., Ortayli, N., Ringheim, K., Cottingham, J., Farley, T. M., Peregoudov, A., et al. (2001). Assessing the acceptability, service delivery requirements, and use-effectiveness of the diaphragm in Colombia, Philippines, and Turkey. Contraception, 63(5), 267–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, R. J., Posner, S. F., Macaluso, M., Artz, L. M., Johnson, C., and Pulley, L. (2003). Do main partner conflict, power dynamics, and control over use of male condoms predict subsequent use of the female condom? Women Health, 38(1), 37–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cecil, H., Perry, M. J., Seal, D. W., and Pinkerton, S. D. (1998). The Female Condom: What We Have Learned Thus Far. AIDS & Behavior, 2(3), 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civic, D., and Wilson, D. (1996). Dry sex in Zimbabwe and implications for condom use. Soc Sci Med, 42(1), 91–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Giacomo do Lago, T., Barbosa, R. M., Kalckmann, S., Villela, W. V., and Gohiman, S. (1995). Acceptability of the Diaphragm among Low-Income Women in Sao Paulo, Brazil. International Family Planning Perspectives, 21(3), 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, C., and Coggins, C. (2001). Acceptability research on female-controlled barrier methods to prevent heterosexual transmission of HIV: Where have we been? Where are we going? J Womens Health Gend Based Med, 10(2), 163–173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellertson, C., and Burns, M. (2003). Re-examining the Role of Cervical Barrier Devices. OUTLOOK, 20(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontanet, A. L., Saba, J., Chandelying, V., Sakondhavat, C., Bhiraleus, P., Rugpao, S., et al. (1998). Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial. Aids, 12(14), 1851–1859.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • French, P. P., Latka, M., Gollub, E. L., Rogers, C., Hoover, D. R., and Stein, Z. A. (2003). Use-effectiveness of the female versus male condom in preventing sexually transmitted disease in women. Sex Transm Dis, 30(5), 433–439.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gollub, E. L., French, P., Latka, M., Rogers, C., and Stein, Z. (2001). Achieving safer sex with choice: studying a women's sexual risk reduction hierarchy in an STD clinic. J Womens Health Gend Based Med, 10(8), 771–783.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, G. J., Pool, R., Green, G., Harrison, S., Nyanzi, S., and Whitworth, J. A. (1999). Women's attitudes to condoms and female-controlled means of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. AIDS Care, 11(6), 687–698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S. M., Bird, S. T., and Branch, M. R. (2003a). A new look at an old method: the diaphragm. Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 35(6), 270–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S. M., Bird, S. T., Maher, J. E., and Beckman, L. J. (2003b). Who continues using the diaphragm and who doesn't: implications for the acceptability of female-controlled HIV prevention methods. Womens Health Issues, 13(5), 185–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, L. L. (1997). Beyond acceptability : reorienting research on contraceptive choice. In Beyond acceptability: users' perspectives on contraception, [compiled by] World Health Organization [WHO], Reproductive Health Matters (pp. 6–14): London, England, Reproductive Health Matters.

  • Hoffman, S., Exner, T. M., Leu, C. S., Ehrhardt, A. A., and Stein, Z. (2003). Female-condom use in a gender-specific family planning clinic trial. Am J Public Health, 93(11), 1897–1903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latka, M., Gollub, E., French, P., and Stein, Z. (2000). Male-condom and female-condom use among women after counseling in a risk-reduction hierarchy for STD prevention. Sex Transm Dis, 27(8), 431–437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macaluso, M., Demand, M., Artz, L., Fleenor, M., Robey, L., Kelaghan, J., et al. (2000). Female condom use among women at high risk of sexually transmitted disease. Fam Plann Perspect, 32(3), 138–144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, K., Lowry, D., and Woolfson, D. (2004, March 28–31). In vitro release of dextran sulfate from silicone intravaginal rings. Paper presented at the Microbicides 2004, London, UK.

  • Malcolm, K., Woolfson, D., Russell, J., and Andrews, C. (2003). In vitro release of nonoxynol-9 from silicone matrix intravaginal rings. J Control Release, 91(3), 355–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moench, T., Chipato, T., and Padian, N. (2001). Preventing disease by protecting the cervix: the unexplored promise of internal vaginal barrier devices. AIDS, 15(13), 1595–1602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ortayli, N., Bulut, A., Nalbant, H., and Cottingham, J. (2000). Is the Diaphragm a Viable Option for Women in Turkey? International Family Planning Perspectives, 26(1), 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, R., Hart, G., Green, G., Harrison, S., Nyanzi, S., and Whitworth, J. (2000a). Men's attitudes to condoms and female controlled means of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. Cult Health Sex, 2(2), 197–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, R., Whitworth, J. A., Green, G., Mbonye, A. K., Harrison, S., Wilkinson, J., et al. (2000b). An acceptability study of female-controlled methods of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. Int J STD AIDS, 11(3), 162–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, S., van der Straten, A., Kang, M., Chipato, T., and Padian, N. (2004, March 28–31). The effect of introducing the diaphragm on male condom use. Paper presented at the Microbicides 2004, London, UK.

  • Ravindran, T. S., and Sumathy, A. R. (1997). Is the diaphragm a suitable method of contraception for low-income women: A user-perspective study, Madras, India. Beyond Acceptability: User's perspectives on contraception—Out of print—A World Health Organization Monograph.

  • Ray, S., Bassett, M., Maposphere, C., Manangazira, P., Nicolette, J. D., Machekano, R., et al. (1995). Acceptability of the female condom in Zimbabwe: Positive but male-centered responses. Reprod Health Matters, 5, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S., van De Wijgert, J., Mason, P., Ndowa, F., and Maposhere, C. (2001). Constraints faced by sex workers in use of female and male condoms for safer sex in urban zimbabwe. J Urban Health, 78(4), 581–592.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Severy, L. J., and Spieler, J. (2000). New methods of family planning: implications for intimate behaviour. Journal of Sex Research, 37(3), 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R., Garcia, S., Kureshy, N., Sadana, R., Singh, S., Becerra-Valdivia, M., et al. (1997). Attributes of contraceptive technology : women's preferences in seven countries. In Beyond acceptability: users' perspectives on contraception, [compiled by] World Health Organization [WHO], Reproductive Health Matters (pp. 36–48): London, England, Reproductive Health Matters.

  • Trussell, J., Sturgen, K., Strickler, J., and Dominik, R. (1994). Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods. Fam Plann Perspect, 26(2), 66–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Straten, A., Kang, M. S., Posner, S. F., Kamba, M., Chipato, T., and Padian, N. S. (2005). Predictors of diaphragm use as a potential sexually transmitted disease/HIV prevention method in Zimbabwe. Sex Transm Dis, 32(1), 64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Straten, A., Montgomery, L., Kamba, M., Kang, M., Posner, S., Chipato, T., et al. (2004, March 28–31). Preference for gel use with diaphragms in Zimbabwe. Paper presented at the Microbicides 2004, London, UK.

  • Weller, S., and Davis, K. (2002). Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD003255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yimin, C., Zhaohui, L., Xianmi, W., Shiying, W., Lingzhi, H., Yueying, X., et al. (2002). Introductory study on female condom use among sex workers in China. Contraception, 66(3), 179–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Contraceptive Research and Development (CONRAD) Program. We would like to gratefully acknowledge the participants without whom this study would not have been possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Buck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buck, J., Kang, MS., van der Straten, A. et al. Barrier Method Preferences and Perceptions Among Zimbabwean Women and their Partners. AIDS Behav 9, 415–422 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-005-9013-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-005-9013-2

KEY WORDS:

Navigation