Skip to main content
Log in

Medical student empathy: interpersonal distinctions and correlates

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attention to interpersonal behaviors, communication, and relational factors is taking on increasing importance in medical education. Medical student empathy is one aspect of the physician–patient relationship that is often involved in beneficial interactions leading to improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. As an interpersonal quality, empathy is a social behavior well-suited to be examined from an interpersonal perspective. The present study used the interpersonal theory of clinical, personality, and social psychology to examine the construct of empathy and theorize about likely interpersonal correlates. One hundred and sixty-three students from an academic health center in the southeastern United States participated in this study. The medical student version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy was used to assess empathy and its factors: Perspective taking, compassionate care, and walking in the patient’s shoes. Interpersonal assessments included the International Personality Item Pool—Interpersonal Circumplex, the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, and the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Distinct interpersonal styles and correlates emerged among empathy and its factors. While all factors of empathy were related to interpersonal warmth, perspective taking and compassionate care were also associated with submissiveness. Of note, only walking in the patient’s shoes was correlated with both social support and less loneliness. These findings are discussed in light of interpersonal theory with particular attention paid to the implications for medical education and professional development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aruguete, M. S., & Roberts, C. A. (2000). Gender, affiliation, and control in physician–patient encounters. Sex Roles, 42(1–2), 107–118. doi:10.1023/a:1007036412480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, J. N., Brown, V., Keady, B., Tranel, D., & Paradiso, S. (2012). Trait empathy as a predictor of individual differences in perceived loneliness. Psychological Reports, 110(1), 3–15. doi:10.2466/07.09.20.pr0.110.1.3-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R. S., Daughtridge, R., & Sloane, P. D. (2002). Physician–patient communication in the primary care office: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice/American Board of Family Practice, 15(1), 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, H. B., Wendland, M., Mooney, C., Krasner, M. S., Quill, T. E., Suchman, A. L., & Epstein, R. M. (2012). The impact of a program in mindful communication on primary care physicians. Academic Medicine, 87(6), 815–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini, L. M., Baime, M., & Shea, J. A. (2002). Variation of mood and empathy during internship. JAMA, 287(23), 3143–3146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertakis, K. D., Roter, D., & Putnam, S. M. (1991). The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. The Journal Of Family Practice, 32(2), 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecil, D. W., & Killeen, I. (1997). Control, compliance, and satisfaction in the family practice encounter. Family Medicine, 29(9), 653–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2008). Basic psychometrics for the ISEL 12 item scale. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cundiff, J. M., Smith, T. W., Butner, J., Critchfield, K. L., & Nealey-Moore, J. (2015). Affiliation and control in marital interaction: Interpersonal complementarity is present but is not associated with affect or relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 35–51. doi:10.1177/0146167214557002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. T., Quan, H., Hemmelgarn, B., Noseworthy, T., Beck, C. A., Dixon, E., et al. (2015). Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15, 32. doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. S. (1968). Variations in patients’ compliance with doctors’ advice: An empirical analysis of patterns of communication. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 58(2), 274–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derksen, F., Bensing, J., & Lagro-Janssen, A. (2013). Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: A systematic review. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 63(606), e76–e84. doi:10.3399/bjgp13X660814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Blasi, Z., Harkness, E., Ernst, E., Georgiou, A., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet (London, England, 357(9258), 757–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grava-Gubins, I., & Scott, S. (2008). Effects of various methodologic strategies: Survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Canadian Family Physician Médecin De Famille Canadien, 54(10), 1424–1430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtman, M. B. (1991). Evaluating the interpersonalness of personality scales. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(6), 670–677. doi:10.1177/0146167291176010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurtman, M. B. (1992). Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: The interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 105–118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J. (2011). From detached concern to empathy: Humanizing medical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M. (2007). Empathy in patient care: Antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., & LaNoue, M. (2014). Exploration and confirmation of the latent variable structure of the Jefferson scale of empathy. International Journal of Medical Education, 5, 73–81. doi:10.5116/ijme.533f.0c41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Louis, D. Z., Markham, F. W., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., & Gonnella, J. S. (2011a). Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 86(3), 359–364. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Mangione, S., Nasca, T. J., Cohen, M. J. M., Gonnella, J. S., Erdmann, J. B., et al. (2001). The Jefferson scale of physician empathy: Development and preliminary psychometric data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 349–365. doi:10.1177/00131640121971158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Spandorfer, J., Louis, D. Z., & Gonnella, J. S. (2011b). Empathic and sympathetic orientations toward patient care: Conceptualization, measurement, and psychometrics. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 86(8), 989–995. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822203d8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Vergare, M. J., Maxwell, K., Brainard, G., Herrine, S. K., Isenberg, G. A., et al. (2009). The devil is in the third year: A longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 84(9), 1182–1191. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, K. M., & Pfeiffer, C. A. (2007). Impact of a new curriculum on medical students’ interpersonal and interviewing skills. Medical Education, 41(2), 154–159. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02680.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. M., Kraft-Todd, G., Schapira, L., Kossowsky, J., & Riess, H. (2014). The influence of the patient–clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 9(4), e94207–e94207. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. J. (1991). Interpersonal methods of assessment and diagnosis. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 438–468). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. J., & Auerbach, S. M. (2003). Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician–patient interaction: The interpersonal circumplex. Social Science and Medicine, 57(9), 1707–1722. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00558-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Oxford: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. A. (2009). Does empathy mediate the relationship between neuroticism and depressive symptomatology among college students? Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 429–433. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelorain, S., Brédart, A., Dolbeault, S., & Sultan, S. (2012). A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer care. Psycho-Oncology, 21(12), 1255–1264. doi:10.1002/pon.2115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K. D. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(2), 249–267. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7502_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markey, P. M., & Markey, C. N. (2009). A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment, 16(4), 352–361. doi:10.1177/1073191109340382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, E. L., Roesch, S. C., Malcarne, V. L., Penedo, F. J., Llabre, M. M., Weitzman, O. B., et al. (2014). Validation of interpersonal support evaluation list-12 (ISEL-12_ scores among English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL sociocultural ancillary study. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, B. W. (2013). Walking a fine line: Is it possible to remain an empathic physician and have a hardened heart? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 233. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, L. E., Berry, J. W., Weiss, J., & Gilbert, P. (2002). Guilt, fear, submission, and empathy in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 71(1–3), 19–27. doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00408-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, J., Bushnell, J. A., & Caputi, P. (2013). Empathy is related to clinical competence in medical care. Medical Education, 47(8), 824–831. doi:10.1111/medu.12232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2013). Interpersonal theory of personality. In H. Tennen, J. Suls, I. B. Weiner, H. Tennen, J. Suls, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 5: Personality and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 141–159). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D. L., Frankel, R. M., Hall, J. A., & Sluyter, D. (2006). The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. Mechanisms and outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(Suppl 1), S28–S34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, J. M., Smith, T. W., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Distinguishing narcissism and hostility: Similarities and differences in interpersonal circumplex and five-factor correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76(3), 537–555. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7603_12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472–480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychology, 11(3), 139–150. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.11.3.139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., & Cundiff, J. M. (2011). An interpersonal perspective on risk for coronary heart disease. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 471–489). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Limon, J. P., Gallo, L. C., & Ngu, L. Q. (1996). Interpersonal control and cardiovascular reactivity: Goals, behavioral expression, and the moderating effects of sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1012–1024. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Traupman, E. K., Uchino, B. N., & Berg, C. A. (2010). Interpersonal circumplex descriptions of psychosocial risk factors for physical illness: Application to hostility, neuroticism, and marital adjustment. Journal of Personality, 78(3), 1011–1036. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00641.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepien, K. A., & Baernstein, A. (2006). Educating for empathy. A review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(5), 524–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. A. (1995). Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: A review. Journal of the Canadian Medical Association, 152, 1423–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the interpersonal adjective scales to include the big five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 781–790. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. C., Kiesler, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (1995). Assessing the interpersonal transaction cycle: Convergence of action and reaction interpersonal circumplex measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 938–949. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. W., Heimberg, R. G., & Heuer, R. (2011). Exploring the role of behavioral submissiveness in social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(3), 217–249. doi:10.1521/jscp.2011.30.3.217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S., & Broughton, R. (1991). A geometric taxonomy of personality scales. European Journal of Personality, 5(5), 343–365. doi:10.1002/per.2410050503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the revised interpersonal adjective scales (IAS—R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23(4), 517–530. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2304_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolnierek, K. B. H., & Dimatteo, M. R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: A meta-analysis. Medical Care, 47(8), 826–834. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a5acc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin D. Jordan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jordan, K.D., Foster, P.S. Medical student empathy: interpersonal distinctions and correlates. Adv in Health Sci Educ 21, 1009–1022 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9675-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9675-8

Keywords

Navigation