Skip to main content
Log in

Intentions versus unintended discursive consequences: reflections upon Sherbino et al.’s commentary on “Flower Power”

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Grant, J. (1999). The incapacitating effects of competency: A critique. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 4, 271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, B. D. (2009). The objective structured clinical examination: A socio-history. LAP Press, Berlin. ISBN:978-3-8383-0181-5.

  • Hodges, B. D. (2010). A tea-steeping or i-doc model for medical education? Academic Medicine, 85, S34–S44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddle, T. S., & Heudebert, G. R. (2007). Taking apart the art: The risk of anatomizing clinical competence. Academic Medicine, 82, 536–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, L. (2009). What we don’t see when we look at “competence”: Notes on a god term. Advances in Health Science Education, 14, 625–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martimianakis, M. A., Maniate, J., & Hodges, B. H. (2009). Sociological interpretations of professionalism. Medical Education, 43(9), 829–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, C. E. (2004). The problem with outcomes-based curricula in medical education: Insights from educational theory. Medical Education, 38(6), 593–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, S., Fox, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2009). The competency movement in the health professions: Ensuring consistent standards or reinforcing conventional domains of practice? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 451–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherbino, J., Frank, J. R., Flynn, L., & Snell, L. (2011). “Intrinsic Roles” rather than “armour”: Renaming the “non-medical expert roles” of the CanMEDS framework to match their intent. Advances in Health Sciences Education. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9318-z.

  • Talbot, M. (2004). Monkey see, monkey do: A critique of the competency model in graduate medical education. Medical Education, 38(6), 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C. (2010). Recipes for medical education reform: Will different ingredients create better doctors? A commentary on Sales and Shlaff. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1672–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C. R., Austin, Z., Hodges, B. D. (2011). Flower power: The armoured expert in the CanMEDS competency framework? Advances in Health Sciences Education. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9277-4.

  • Zibrowski, E. M., Singh, S. I., Goldszmidt, M. A., Watling, C. J., Kenyon, C. F., Schulz, V., et al. (2009). The sum of the parts detracts from the intended whole: Competencies and in-training assessments. Medical Education, 43, 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia R. Whitehead.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitehead, C.R., Austin, Z. & Hodges, B.D. Intentions versus unintended discursive consequences: reflections upon Sherbino et al.’s commentary on “Flower Power”. Adv in Health Sci Educ 16, 699–701 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9337-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9337-9

Keywords

Navigation