Skip to main content
Log in

Resident physicians’ perspectives on effective outpatient teaching: a qualitative study

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning theories, which suggest that experienced faculty use collaborative teaching styles, are reflected in qualitative studies of learners in hospital settings. However, little research has used resident focus groups to explore characteristics of successful teachers in outpatient clinics. Therefore, focus group discussions with first through third-year internal medicine residents at a large academic medical center were conducted to better understand residents’ perspectives on effective outpatient teaching. A group facilitator solicited residents’ reflections, based on their lived experiences, on teaching domains from previous factor analytic studies: interpersonal, clinical-teaching, and efficiency. Researchers coded focus group transcripts and identified themes within the domains. Final themes were determined by consensus. Leading themes were “kindness” and “teacher–learner relationships.” Junior residents were sensitive to faculty who were brusque, harsh, and degrading. Senior residents respected faculty who were humble, collaborative, and allowed residents to co-manage teaching encounters. Seniors emphasized the importance of faculty role-modelling and preferentially staffed with experts to “gain wisdom from experience.” Overall, residents expressed that effective learning requires grounded teacher–learner relationships. These findings support learning theories and previous factor analytic studies. However, this qualitative study provided insights that could not be gleaned from assessment scores alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckman, T. J. (2004). Lessons learned from a peer review of bedside teaching. Academic Medicine, 79, 343–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, T. J. (2007). Determining the validity and reliability of clinical assessment scores. In M. C. Henderson (Ed.), A textbook for internal medicine education programs (pp. 139–146). Washington, DC: Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine and Association of Specialty Professors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, T. J., & Cook, D. A. (2007). Developing scholarly projects in education: A primer for medical teachers. Medical Teacher, 29, 210–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, T. J., Cook, D. A., & Mandrekar, J. N. (2006). Factor instability of clinical teaching assessment scores among general internists and cardiologists. Medical Education, 40, 1209–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, T. J., Ghosh, A. K., Cook, D. A., Erwin, P. J., & Mandrekar, J. N. (2004). How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 971–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, T. J., & Lee, M. C. (2009). Proposal for a collaborative approach to clinical teaching. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 84, 339–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, T. J., & Mandrekar, J. N. (2005). The interpersonal, cognitive, and efficiency domains of clinical teaching: Construct validity of a multidimensional scale. Medical Education, 39, 1221–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calman, K. C., & Donaldson, M. (1991). The pre-registration house officer year: A critical incident study. Medical Education, 25, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castiglioni, A., Shewchuk, R. M., Willett, L. L., Heudebert, G. R., & Centor, R. M. (2008). A pilot study using nominal group technique to assess residents’ perceptions of successful attending rounds. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 1060–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. American Journal of Medicine, 119, e7–e16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, S. J., Cation, L. J., & Jackson, J. L. (2003). The reliability and validity of the American Board of Internal Medicine Monthly Evaluation Form. Academic Medicine, 78, 1175–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidet, P., & Stein, H. F. (2006). The role of the student–teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. The hidden curriculum as process. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, S16–S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. M., Fleury, R. A., & Jackson, T. B. (1979). Curriculum content from critical incidents. Medical Education, 13, 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irby, D. M. (1992). How attending physicians make instructional decisions when conducting teaching rounds. Academic Medicine, 67, 630–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irby, D. M. (1994). What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Academic Medicine, 69, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner. London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, W. D., Weinholtz, D., & Friedman, C. P. (1983). The attending physician as teacher. New England Journal of Medicine, 308, 1129–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P. J., James, C. A., & Abrahamowicz, M. (1993). Clinical tutor evaluation: A 5-year study by students on an in-patient service and residents in an ambulatory care clinic. Medical Education, 27, 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, D. H., & Matharu, M. (1995). Students perception of good and bad teaching: Report of a critical incident study. Medical Education, 29, 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. G., Kroenke, K., Ritter, J., Dy, N., & Pangaro, L. (1999). What learners and teachers value most in ambulatory educational encounters: A prospective qualitative study. Academic Medicine, 74, 186–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. J. (2007). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangaro, L. (1999). A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Academic Medicine, 74, 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silber, C. G., Nasca, T. J., Paskin, D. L., Eiger, G., Robeson, M., & Voleski, J. J. (2004). Do global rating forms enable program directors to assess the ACGME competencies? Academic Medicine, 79, 549–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeff, K. M. (1988). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and vitality in the ambulatory setting. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 3, S26–S33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. T., Williams, B. C., Gill, A., Gruppen, L. D., Woolliscroft, J. O., & Grum, C. M. (2000). Is there a relationship between attending physicians’ and residents’ teaching skills and students’ examination scores? Academic Medicine, 75, 1144–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (2008). To call or not to call: A judgment of risk by pre-registration house officers. Medical Education, 42, 938–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stritter, F. T., & Baker, R. M. (1982). Resident preferences for the clinical teaching of ambulatory care. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutkin, G., Wagner, E., Harris, I., & Schiffer, R. (2008). What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 83, 452–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, D. M., Daley, B. J., Sebastian, J. L., & Elnicki, D. M. (2006). Overview of current learning theories for medical educators. American Journal of Medicine, 119, 903–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. N., Ramani, S., Fraser, B., & Orlander, J. D. (2008). Improving bedside teaching: Findings from a focus group study of learners. Academic Medicine, 83, 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., Wiener, M. W., Markakis, K. M., Reeve, J. M., & Deci, E. L. (1994). Medical students’ motivation for internal medicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 9, 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Education Research Journal, 41, 715–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. M., Kern, D. E., Kolodner, K., Howard, D. M., & Branciati, F. L. (1998). Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models. New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1986–1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Presented at the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) Annual Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic, 30 August–4 September 2008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Beckman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kisiel, J.B., Bundrick, J.B. & Beckman, T.J. Resident physicians’ perspectives on effective outpatient teaching: a qualitative study. Adv in Health Sci Educ 15, 357–368 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9202-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9202-2

Keywords

Navigation