Skip to main content
Log in

Summative evaluation on the hospital wards. What do faculty say to learners?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

No previous studies have described how faculty give summative evaluations to learners on the medical wards. The aim of this study was to describe summative evaluations on the medical wards. Participants were students, house staff and faculty at the University of Pittsburgh. Ward rotation evaluative sessions were tape recorded. Feedback was characterized as to whether it was: (a) general or specific; (b) positive versus corrective; (c) elaborative or simple; and (d) for corrective feedback, if an action plan was discussed. 68 evaluation sessions were recorded. 86% of sessions included general, positive statements. On average, seven specific statements were made per feedback session: five were positive and two were corrective. 52% of comments were elaborated. In 41% of cases, the learner was given an action plan for improvement. During a summative evaluation faculty do not elaborate on the learner’s behavior. This is particularly true when giving corrective feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardella, I. J., Janosky, J., Elnicki, D. M., Ploof, D., & Kolarik, R. (2005). Observed versus reported precepting skills: Teaching behaviors in a community ambulatory clerkship. Medical Education, 39, 1036–1044. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02269.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, H. R., & Geer, B. (1982). Participant observation: The analysis of qualitative field data. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Field research: A source book and field manual. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, W. T., & Paranjape, A. (2002). Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings. Academic Medicine, 77(12), 1185–1188. doi:10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burack, J. H., Irby, D. M., Carline, J. D., Root, R. K., & Larsen, E. B. (1999). Teaching compassion and respect. Attending physicians’ responses to problematic behaviors. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, 49–55. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00280.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ende, J. (1983). Feedback in clinical medical education. The Journal of American Medical Association, 250, 777–781. doi:10.1001/jama.250.6.777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ende, J., Pomerantz, A., & Erickson, F. (1995). Preceptors’ strategies for correcting residents in an ambulatory care medicine setting: A qualitative analysis. Academic Medicine, 70, 224–229. doi:10.1097/00001888-199503000-00014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, D. H. (1984). Perceptions of medical school faculty members and students on clinical clerkship feedback. Journal of Medical Education, 59, 856–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, M. G., & Little, M. L. (1998). Giving feedback in medical education. Verification of recommended techniques. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13, 111–116. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00027.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmboe, E. S., Friebach, N. H., Galaty, L. A., & Huot, S. (2001). Effectiveness of a focused educational intervention on resident evaluations from faculty: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(7), 427–434. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007427.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmboe, E. S., Yepes, M., Williams, F., & Huot, S. J. (2004). Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(5), 558–561. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30134.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irby, D. M. (1994). What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Academic Medicine, 69(5), 333–342. doi:10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irby, D. M. (1995). Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: A thematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 70(10), 898–931. doi:10.1097/00001888-199510000-00014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issacson, J. H., Posk, L. K., Litaker, D. G., & Halperin, A. K. (1995). Resident perceptions of the evaluation process. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10(5), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, F., Everett, K., McGowen, R., & Bennard, B. (2000). Faculty development in communication skills instruction: Insights from a longitudinal program with “Real-Time Feedback”. Academic Medicine, 75, 1222–1228. doi:10.1097/00001888-200012000-00022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, W. D., Weinholtz, D., & Friedman, C. P. (1983). The attending physicain as teacher. The New England Journal of Medicine, 308, 1129–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., Cumming, A., & Cameron, H. (2007). Performance-based assessment in undergraduate medical education. The Clinical Teacher, 4(1), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangaro, L. (1999). A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Academic Medicine, 74, 41–45. doi:10.1097/00001888-199911000-00012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 320(7227), 114–116. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes-Kropf, J., Carmody, S. S., Seltzer, D., et al. (2005). “This is Just Too Awful; I Can’t Believe I Experienced That….” Medical Students Reactions to Their “Most Memorable” Patient Death. Academic Medicine, 80(7), 634–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtes, P. R. (1988). The team handbook: How to use teams to improve quality. Madison, WI: Joiner Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook, M. (2001). Learning to teach. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 77, 361–362. doi:10.1136/pmj.77.908.361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stritter, F. T., & Becker, M. (1993). Research and practice in medical education. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 83(6), 314–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • The American Board of Internal Medicine. (1987). The role of the attending physician in evaluating residents. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinholtz, D., Everett, G., Albanese, M., & Shymansky, J. (1986). The attending round observation system: A procedure for describing teaching during attending rounds. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 9(1), 75–89. doi:10.1177/016327878600900106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westberg, J., & Jason, H. (1993). Collaborative clinical education: The foundation of effective health care. NY: Springer Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Drs. Frank Kroboth and Rosanne Granieri for their support of this work. Abstract Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine April 2005 This project was funded by the Division of General Internal Medicine education grant at the University of Pittsburgh

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peggy B. Hasley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasley, P.B., Arnold, R.M. Summative evaluation on the hospital wards. What do faculty say to learners?. Adv in Health Sci Educ 14, 431–439 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9127-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9127-1

Keywords

Navigation