Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in Students’ Perceptions of Learning Compulsory Foundation Biochemistry in the Health Sciences Professions

  • Personality
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Student approaches to learning vary from surface approaches to meaningful, deep learning practices. Differences in approach may be related to students’ conceptions of the subject, perceptions of the learning environment, prior study experiences and performance on assessment. This study aims to explore entering students’ conceptions of the unit they are about to study and how they intend to approach their studies. It involved a survey of 203 (of 250) first year students in a cross disciplinary unit in the Faculty of Health Sciences. They were asked to complete an open-ended response survey, including questions on what they thought they needed to do to learn biochemistry and what they thought the study of biochemistry was about. A phenomenographic methodology was used to identify categories of description for the questions. The paper will describe the categories in detail, the structural relationship between the categories and the distribution of responses within categories. The study reports a relationship between conception of the topic and approaches to learning. Students with more complex and coherent conceptions of the topic report that they were more likely to adopt deeper approaches to study than those with more fragmented conceptions. However, compared to previous studies, a surprisingly high proportion of students with more cohesive conceptions still intended to adopt more surface approaches. This may reflect the particular context of their learning, namely in a compulsory unit involving material for which most students have minimal background and difficulty seeing its relevance. Implications for teaching such foundation material are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Bowden E Walsh (2000) Phenomenography RMIT Melbourne, Vic

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Crawford S. Gordon J. Nicholas M. Prosser (1998) ArticleTitleQualitatively different experiences of learning Mathematics at University Learning and Instruction 8 455–468 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00005-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Duke H. Forbes S. Hunter M Prosser (1998) ArticleTitleProblem-based learning (PBL): Conceptions and approaches of undergraduate students of nursing Advances in Health Sciences Education 3 59–70 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009763324321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Entwistle (1997) ArticleTitleIntroduction: Phenomenography in higher education Research and Development in Higher Education 16 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Marton D. Hounsell N Entwistle (1997) The Experience of Learning Scottish Academic Press Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Marton R Saljo (1976) ArticleTitleOn qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Minasian-Batmanian, L.C., Lingard, J., Prosser, M., Stewart, C. & Sharma, M.D. (2003). Understanding student learning: a comparison of students’ perceptions of learning in two different disciplines. In Institute for Teaching and Learning, Vice-Chancellor’s Teaching and Learning Showcase of Scholarly Reflection and Inquiry: Graduates of the World, p. 75. Sydney: University of Sydney Publishing Service

  • M. Prosser (1993) ArticleTitlePhenomenography and the principles and practices of learning Higher Education Research and Development 12 21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Prosser K Trigwell (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education Society for Research in Higher Education and the Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Prosser P. Walker R Millar (1996) ArticleTitleDifferences in students’ perceptions of learning physics Physics Education 31 43–48 Occurrence Handle10.1088/0031-9120/31/1/022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Ramsden (1992) Learning to Teach in Higher Education Routledge London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Ramsden (1998) Improving Learning: New Perspectives Kogan Page London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Ramsden (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education RoutledgeFalmer London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C., Sharma, M., May, E., Peat, M., Quinnell, R., Taylor, C., Prosser, M. & Logan, P. (2001). How will changes in HSC syllabi affect students approaches to learning and conceptions of physics and biology? In Institute for Teaching and Learning, The Vice Chancellor’s Showcase of Scholarly Inquiry in Teaching and Learning, p. 39. Sydney: University of Sydney Publishing Service

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura C. Minasian-Batmanian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minasian-Batmanian, L.C., Lingard, J. & Prosser, M. Differences in Students’ Perceptions of Learning Compulsory Foundation Biochemistry in the Health Sciences Professions. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 10, 279–290 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-1404-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-1404-7

Keywords

Navigation