Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizing Multiagent Systems

  • Published:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite all the research done in the last years on the development of methodologies for designing MAS, there is no methodology suitable for the specification and design of MAS in complex domains where both the agent view and the organizational view can be modeled. Current multiagent approaches either take a centralist, static approach to organizational design or take an emergent view in which agent interactions are not pre-determined, thus making it impossible to make any predictions on the behavior of the whole systems. Most of them also lack a model of the norms in the environment that should rule the (emergent) behavior of the agent society as a whole and/or the actions of individuals. In this paper, we propose a framework for modeling agent organizations, Organizational Model for Normative Institutions (OMNI), that allows the balance of global organizational requirements with the autonomy of individual agents. It specifies global goals of the system independently from those of the specific agents that populate the system. Both the norms that regulate interaction between agents, as well as the contextual meaning of those interactions are important aspects when specifying the organizational structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Bresciani, P. Giorgini, F. Giunchiglia, J. Mylopoulos, and A. Perini, “TROPOS: An agent-oriented software development methodology,” Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, to appear.

  2. C. Castelfranchi,“Commitments: from individual intentions to groups and organizations”, in V. Lesser, (ed.), Proceedings of the first International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’95), MIT Press, pp. 41–48, 2005.

  3. C. Castelfranchi, F. Dignum, C. Jonker, and J. Treur, “Deliberative Normative Agents: Principles and architecture,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-99).

  4. J. Castro M. Kolp J. Mylopoulos (2002) ArticleTitle“Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the TROPOS project” Information Systems 27 365–389 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0306-4379(02)00012-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Dastani, V. Dignum, and F. Dignum, “Role assignment in open agent societies,” in Proceedings of the AAMAS’03, 2003.

  6. D. Dennet (1987) The Intentional Stance MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Dignum (1999) ArticleTitle“Autonomous Agents with Norms ” AI and Law 7 69–79

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Dignum, “A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic,” SIKS Dissertation Series 2004–1, PhD Thesis, SIKS, 2004.

  9. V. Dignum and F. Dignum, “Modeling agent societies: Coordination frameworks and institutions,” in P. Brazdil and A. Jorge (eds.), Progress in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 2258, Springer-Verlag, pp. 191–204, 2001.

  10. V. Dignum, J.-J. Meyer, F. Dignum, and H. Weigand, “Formal specification of interaction in agent societies,” in Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems (FAABS’02).

  11. V. Dignum, J.-J. Ch. Meyer, H. Wiegand, and F. Dignum. “An organisational-oriented model for agent societies,” in G. Lindemann, D. Moldt, M. Paolucci, and B. Yu (eds.), Proceedings of the RASTA Workshop at AAMAS’02, pp. 31–50.

  12. V. Dignum and H. Weigand, “Towards an organization-oriented design methodology for agent societies,” in V. Plekhanova (eds.), Intelligent Agent Software Engineering, Idea Group Publishing, pp. 191–212, 2002.

  13. M. Esteva, J. Padget, and C. Sierra, “Formalizing a language for institutions and norms,” in J.-J. Ch. Meyer and M. Tambe (eds.), Intelligent Agents VIII, Vol. 2333 of LNAI, Springer-Verlag, pp. 348–366, 2001.

  14. D. Grossi and F. Dignum, “From Abstract to Concrete Norms in Agent Institutions,” in Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent-based Systems, FAABS III, 2004.

  15. N. Howden, R. Rnnquist, A. Hodgson, and A. Lucas, “Jack-summary of an agent infrastructure,” in fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2001.

  16. M. Huhns M. Abdulla (1999) ArticleTitle“Benevolent agents ” IEEE Internet Computing 3 IssueID2 96–98 Occurrence Handle10.1109/4236.761661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kalenka, Modelling social interaction attitudes in multi-agent systems, PhD Thesis, Department of Electronic Engineering, University of London, 2001.

  18. R. Likert (1961) New Patterns of Management McGraw-Hill Book Company New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.-J.Ch. Meyer (1988) ArticleTitle“A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic ” Notre Dame J. of Formal Logic 29 IssueID1 109–136

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.-J. Ch. Meyer and R. J. Wieringa, Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification. John Wiley and Sons, 1991.

  21. M. Miceli and C. Castelfranchi, “The role of evaluation in cognition and social interaction,” in Dautenhahn K. (ed.), Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology, John Benjamins, 1999.

  22. M. Miceli A. Cesta P. Rizzo (1996) ArticleTitle“Distributed artificial intelligence from a sociocognitive standpoint: Looking at reasons for interaction ” Artificial Intelligence and Society 9 287–320

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Noriega, Agent-Mediated Auctions: The Fishmarket Metaphor. Number 8 in IIIA Monograph Series. Institut d’Investigació en Intel.ligència Artificial (IIIA), 1997. PhD Thesis.

  24. A. Omicini, “Soda: Societies and infrastructures in the analysis and design of agent-based systems,” in P. Ciancarini and M. Wooldridge (eds.), Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, vol. 1957 of LNAI, Springer Verlag, pp. 185–193, 2001.

  25. Organización Nacional de Transplantes. http://www.msc.es/ont.

  26. H. V. D. Parunak and J. Odell, “Representing social structures in uml,” in M. Wooldridge, G. Weiss, and P. Ciancarini (eds.), Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II, LNCS 2222, Springer-Verlag, 2002.

  27. W. Powell (1990) ArticleTitle“Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organisation ” Research in Organisational Behavior 12 295–336

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. A. Rodriguez, “On the design and construction of agent-mediated electronic institutions,” PhD Thesis, Institut d’Investigació en Intel.ligència Artificial (IIIA), 2001.

  29. J. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, 1969.

  30. J. Serrano and S. Ossowski, “An approach to agent communication based on organizational roles,” in Cooperative Information Agents VI, LNAI.

  31. J. S. Sichman and R. Conte, “On personal and role mental attitudes: A preliminary dependency-based analysis,” in F. Oliveira (ed.), Advances in AI: Proceedings of the 14th Brazilian Simposium on AI, LNAI 1515, Springer-Verlag, 1998.

  32. M. Singh, “Agent communication languages: Rethinking the principles,” IEEE Computer, pp. 40–47, 1998.

  33. I. Smith, P. Cohen, J. Bradshaw, M. Greaves, and H. Holmback, “Designing conversation policies using joint intention theory,” in Proceedings of the ICMAS-98, IEEE Press, pp. 269–276, 1998.

  34. J. van Diggelen, R. J. Beun, F. Dignum, R. M. van Eijk, and J.-J. Meyer, “Optimal communication vocubularies in the presence of heterogeneous ontologies,” Technical Report UU-CS-2004-003, Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, 2004.

  35. W. Vasconcelos, J. Sabater, C. Sierra, and J. Querol, “Skeleton-based agent development for electronic institutions,” in Proceedings of the AAMAS’02, 2003.

  36. J. Vázquez-Salceda, U. Cortés, and J. Padget, “Integrating the organ and tissue allocation processes through an agent-mediated electronic institution,” LNAI-2504, pp. 309–321, 2002.

  37. J. Vázquez-Salceda and F. Dignum, “Modelling electronic organizations,” in V. Marik, J. Muller, and M. Pechoucek (eds.), Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III, LNAI 2691, Springer-Verlag, pp. 584–593, 2003.

  38. G. H. von Wright, “On the logic of norms and actions,” New Studies in Deontic Logic, pp. 3–35, 1981.

  39. O. Williamson (1975) Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Wooldridge N.R. Jennings D. Kinny (2000) ArticleTitle“The Gaia Methodology for Agent- Oriented Analysis and Design,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3 IssueID3 285–312 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010071910869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. F. Zambonelli, “Abstractions and infrastructures for the design and development of mobile agent organizations,” in M. Wooldridge, G. Weiss, and P. Ciancarini (eds.), Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II, LNCS 2222, Springer-Verlag, pp. 245–262, 2002.

  42. F. Zambonelli, N. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge, “Organisational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi-agent systems,” in P. Ciancarini and M. Wooldridge (eds.), Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, LNCS 1957, Springer-Verlag, pp. 98–114, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.089, 3508, TB, Utretch, The Netherlands

    Javier Vázquez-Salceda, Virginia Dignum & Frank Dignum

Authors
  1. Javier Vázquez-Salceda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Virginia Dignum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Dignum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Vázquez-Salceda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, V. & Dignum, F. Organizing Multiagent Systems. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 11, 307–360 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-1673-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-005-1673-9

Key words

Search

Navigation