Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variation of soil microbial and earthworm communities along an agricultural transect with tree windbreak

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Windbreaks are among the most widespread agroforestry systems in the temperate biome. Tree windbreaks are expected to have unique soil properties and biotic communities, compared to adjacent agricultural fields. We compared key soil properties and communities of earthworms, bacteria and fungi along an agricultural transect through a tree windbreak into a cropped field. Soil properties, earthworm abundance and diversity, and bacterial and fungal alpha-diversity (16S-rRNA and ITS gene sequencing) were assessed along transects at distances of 0 (directly under the tree canopy), 8 (ecotone in the cropped field) and 50 m from the tree row in six mature (20- to 70-years-old) tree windbreaks located in southeastern Québec, Canada. Soil organic C, total N and C:N ratio were higher, while soil pH was lower in the tree row than in the adjacent cropped fields at distances of 8 m and 50 m from the windbreak. Each group of biota had a distinct pattern along the agricultural transect. Earthworm abundance and biomass were greater at 50 m than 8 m from the windbreak. Epigeic, endogeic, and anecic earthworms varied similarly along the agricultural transect. Fungal diversity was higher at 8 m than at 0 m from the windbreak. Bacterial diversity was higher at 50 m than at 0 m from the windbreak. Tree windbreaks made the soil environment in the ecotone more favorable for fungal communities, but less favorable for earthworm communities. Greater bacterial diversity was associated with agricultural activities than windbreaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abail Z, Whalen JK (2018) Corn residue inputs influence earthworm population dynamics in a no-till corn-soybean rotation. Appl Soil Ecol 127:120–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadi CC, Farrell RE, Van Rees KC (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions along a shelterbelt-cropped field transect. Agric Ecosyst Environ 241:110–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baah-Acheamfour M, Carlyle CN, Bork EW, Chang SX (2014) Trees increase soil carbon and its stability in three agroforestry systems in central Alberta, Canada. For Ecol Manag 328:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Baah-Acheamfour M, Chang SX, Bork EW, Carlyle CN (2017) The potential of agroforestry to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gases in Canada: insight from pairwise comparisons with traditional agriculture, data gaps and future research. For Chron 93:180–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Baah-Acheamfour M, Carlyle CN, Bissett A, Richardson AE, Siddique T, Bork EW, Chang SX (2016) Determinants of bacterial communities in Canadian agroforestry systems. Environ Microbiol 18:1805–1816

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan S, Jose S, Udawatta RP, Fritschi F (2013) Microbial community diversity in a 21-year-old temperate alley cropping system. Agrofor Syst 87:1031–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol) 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergkemper F, Schöler A, Engel M, Lang F, KrAger J, Schloter M et al (2016) Phosphorus depletion in forest soils shapes bacterial communities towards phosphorus recycling systems. Environ Microbiol 18:1988–2000

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D, Valentine D, Wells C, Valentine U (1989) An empirical-analysis of the factors contributing to 20-year decrease in soil-pH in an old-field plantation of loblolly-pine. Biogeochemistry 8:39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin C, Jobin B, Bélanger L, Choinière L (2002) Plant diversity in three types of hedgerows adjacent to cropfields. Biodiver Conserv 11:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley RL, Whalen J, Chagnon PL, Lanoix M, Alves MC (2011) Nitrous oxide production and potential denitrification in soils from riparian buffer strips: influence of earthworms and plant litter. Appl Soil Ecol 47:6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Tyndal J, Sudmeyer RA, Hodges L (2009) Windbreak practices. In: Garrett HE, Rietveld WE, Fisher RF (eds) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 75–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Briones MJI, Schmidt O (2017) Conventional tillage decreases the abundance and biomass of earthworms and alters their community structure in a global meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 23:4396–4419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinael R, Guenet B, Chevallier T, Dupraz C, Cozzi T, Chenu C (2018) High organic inputs explain shallow and deep SOC storage in a long-term agroforestry system—combining experimental and modeling approaches. Biogeosciences 15:297–317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinael R, Hoeffner K, Chenu C, Chevallier T, Béral C, Dewisme A, Cluzeau D (2019) Spatial variation of earthworm communities and soil organic carbon in temperate agroforestry. Biol Fertil Soils 55:171–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Centre de Référence en Agriculture et Agroalimentaire du Québec (CRAAQ) (2010) Guide de reference en fertilisation, 2nd edn. Centre de Référence en Agriculture et Agroalimentaire du Québec, Québec

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden SJ, Huerta E, De Goede RGM, Pulleman MM (2015) Earthworm assemblages as affected by field margin strips and tillage intensity: an on-farm approach. Eur J Soil Biol 66:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Acunto L, Semmartin M, Ghersa CM (2016) Uncultivated margins are source of soil microbial diversity in an agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 220:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano A, Jacobson MG (2018) Soil carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems: a meta-analysis. Agrofor Syst 92:285–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon GS, Van Rees KC (2017) Soil organic carbon sequestration by shelterbelt agroforestry systems in Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 97:94–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer N, Milcu A, Sabais ACW, Bessler H, Brenner J, Engels C et al (2011) Plant diversity surpasses plant functional groups and plant productivity as driver of soil biota in the long term. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16055

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2019) The national climate data and information archive. Canadian climate normals or averages 1981–2010. www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca. Accessed 5 Feb 2019

  • Heath SK, Soykan CU, Velas KL, Kelsey R, Kross SM (2017) A bustle in the hedgerow: woody field margins boost on farm avian diversity and abundance in an intensive agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv 212:153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden J, Grayson R, Berdeni D, Bird S, Chapman PJ, Edmondson JL, Firbank LG, Helgason T, Hodson ME, Hunt S, Jones DT, Lappage M, Marshall-Harries E, Nelson M, Prendergast-Miller M, Shaw H, Wade R, Leake JR (2019) The role of hedgerows in soil functioning within agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 273:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihrmark K, Bödeker ITM, Cruz-Martinez K, Friberg H, Kubártová A, Schenck J, Strid Y, Stenlid J, Brandström-Durling M, Clemmensen KE et al (2012) New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region—evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 82:666–677

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby K, Wilson J, Munro RC, Cavers S (2007) Mycorrhizas in agroforestry: spread and sharing of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi between trees and crops: complementary use of molecular and microscopic approaches. Plant Soil 294:125–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Kembel SW, Wu M, Eisen JA, Green JL (2012) Incorporating 16s gene copy number information improves estimates of microbial diversity and abundance. PLOS Comput Biol 8:e1002743

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kernecker M, Whalen JK, Bradley RL (2015) Agricultural management and flooding shape habitats for non-native earthworms in southern Quebec, Canada. Appl Soil Ecol 96:240–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO (2013) Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucl Acids Res 41:e1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23:165–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2014) Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:443–454

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milcu A, Allan E, Roscher C, Jenkins T, Meyer ST, Flynn D, Bessler H, Buscot F, Engels C, Gubsch M, Koenig S, Lipowsky A, Loranger J, Renker C, Scherber C, Schmid B, Thebault E, Wubet T, Weisser WW, Scheu S, Eisenhauer N (2013) Functionally and phylogenetically diverse plant communities key to soil biota. Ecology 94:1878–1885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mize CW, Brandle JR, Schoeneberger MM, Bentrup G (2008) Ecological development and function of shelterbelts in temperate North America. Adv Agrofor 4:27–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungai NW, Motavalli PP (2006) Litter quality effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in temperate alley cropping systems. Appl Soil Ecol 31:32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuberg IK (1998) Effect of shelter on temperate crops: a review to define research for Australian conditions. Agrofor Syst 41:3–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardon P, Reubens B, Reheul D, Mertens J, De Frenne P, Coussement T, Janssens P, Verheyen K (2017) Trees increase soil organic carbon and nutrient availability in temperate agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 247:98–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pardon P, Reheul D, Mertens J, Reubens B, De Frenne P, De Smedt P, Proesmans W, Van Vooren L, Verheyen K (2019) Gradients in abundance and diversity of ground dwelling arthropods as a function of distance to tree rows in temperate arable agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 270:114–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Prober SM, Leff JW, Bates ST, Borer ET, Firn J, Harpole WS, Lind EM, Seabloom EW, Adler PB, Bakker JD, Cleland EE, DeCrappeo N, DeLorenze E, Hagenah N, Hautier Y, Hofmockel KS, Kirkman KP, Knops JMH, La Pierre KJ, MacDougall AS, McCulley RL, Mitchell CE, Risch AC, Schuetz M, Stevens CJ, Williams RJ, Fierer N (2015) Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide. Ecol Lett 18:85–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price GW, Gordon AM (1998) Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworms in a temperate intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 44:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Priha O, Smolander A (1999) Nitrogen transformations in soil under Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula pendula at two forest sites. Soil Biol Biochem 31:965–977

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez KS, Craine JM, Fierer N (2012) Consistent effects of nitrogen amendments on soil microbial communities and processes across biomes. Glob Change Biol 18:1918–1927

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivest D, Vézina A (2015) Maize yield patterns on the leeward side of tree windbreaks are site-specific and depend on rainfall conditions in eastern Canada. Agrofor Syst 89:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivest M, Whalen J, Rivest D (2019) Tree diversity is not always a strong driver of soil microbial diversity: a 7-year-old diversity experiment with trees. Ecosphere 10:e02685

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Réseaux grandes cultures du Québec (RGCQ) (2016) Guide des réseaux grandes cultures du Québec. CEROM, p 56

  • Sauer TJ, Cambardella CA, Brandle JR (2007) Soil carbon and tree litter dynamics in a red cedar–scotch pine shelterbelt. Agrofor Syst 71:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Mitchell J, Scow K (2019) Cover cropping and no-till increase diversity and symbiotroph: saprotroph ratios of soil fungal communities. Soil Biol Biochem 129:99–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Gravuer K, Bossange A, Mitchell J, Scow K (2018) Long-term use of cover 702 crops and no-till shift soil microbial community life strategies in agricultural soil. PLoS ONE 13(703):e0192953

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert DP (1990) Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae. In: Dindal DL (ed) Soil biology guide. Wiley, New York, pp 341–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva M, Prince ME (2008) The conservation value of hedgerows for small mammals in Prince Edward Island, Canada. Am Mid Nat 159:110–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Classification Working Group (1998) The Canadian system of soil classification, 3rd edn. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Publication 1646, Ottawa (Revised)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevathasan N, Gordon AM, Bradley R, Cogliastro A, Folkard P, Grant R, Kort J, Liggins L, Njenga F, Olivier A, Pharo C, Powell G, Rivest D, Schiks T, Trotter D, Whalen J, Zabek L (2012) Agroforestry research and development in Canada: the way forward. Adv Agrofor 9:247–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Adamson BW, Anderson SH (2008) Variations in soil aggregate stability and enzyme activities in a temperate agroforestry practice. Appl Soil Ecol 39:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Breemen N, Mulder J, Driscoll CT (1983) Acidification and alkalinization of soils. Plant Soil 75:283–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagg C, Dudenhöffer JH, Widmer F, van der Heijden MG (2018) Linking diversity, synchrony and stability in soil microbial communities. Funct Ecol 32:1280–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen JK (2004) Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworm patches in corn field, hayfield and forest systems of southwestern Québec, Canada. Appl Soil Ecol 27:143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen JK (2014) Managing soil biota-mediated decomposition and nutrient mineralization in sustainable agroecosystems. Adv Agric 2014:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/384604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW, Hawke MF, Rijkse WC (2000) Changes in soil fauna and soil conditions under Pinus radiata agroforestry regimes during a 25-year tree rotation. Biol Fertil Soils 31:391–406

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2014-05606, D. Rivest) and the CREATE (Collaborative Research and Training Experience, M. Rivest) Program. We thank Alice Antonio for technical assistance. We thank the numerous landowners who collaborated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Rivest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivest, M., Whalen, J.K. & Rivest, D. Variation of soil microbial and earthworm communities along an agricultural transect with tree windbreak. Agroforest Syst 94, 1639–1649 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00476-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00476-3

Keywords

Navigation