Abstract
Effects of tree windbreaks on crop production vary from field to field. However, considerable labor is required to evaluate the effects of windbreaks by conducting yield surveys in multiple fields. The present study aimed to clarify whether the spatial pattern of windbreak effects on maize growth can be evaluated using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in a field with a windbreak in Hokkaido, northern Japan. We mapped normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) distribution in the field using a UAV and conducted micrometeorological observation and survey of growth and yield. We found that the windbreak positively affected maize growth by increasing soil temperature at 3–5 H (H = windbreak height) and negatively by shading at approximately 1 H. NDVI estimated using the UAV was high in June and low in September, suggesting that the growth rate of maize at 3–5 H was higher than that at 6–12 H. NDVI was significantly correlated to dry matter content of maize, although the area shaded by the windbreak during observation could not be used for analysis. These results indicate that a UAV was successful to grasp spatial pattern of windbreak effects on maize growth. This study shows the potential of a UAV to be useful for saving time and money when we evaluate the effects of windbreaks on crop growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baez-Gonzalez AD, Kiniry JR, Maas SJ, Tiscareno LM, Macias CJ, Mendoza JL, Richardson CW, Salinas GJ, Manjarrez JR (2005) Large-area maize yield forecasting using leaf area index based yield model. Agron J 97:418–425
Berni JAJ, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Suárez L, Fereres E (2009) Thermal and narrowband multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47:722–738
Bird PR (1998) Tree windbreaks and shelter benefits to pasture in temperate grazing systems. Agrofor Syst 41:35–54
Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78
Easson DL, Fearnehough W (2000) Effects of plastic mulch, sowing date and cultivar on the yield and maturity of forage maize grown under marginal climatic conditions in Northern Ireland. Grass Forage Sci 55:221–231
Easterling WE, Hays CJ, Easterling MM, Brandle JR (1997) Modelling the effect of shelterbelts on maize productivity under climate change: an application of the EPIC model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 61:163–176
Fairey NA (1983) Yield, quality and development of forage maize as influenced by dates of planting and harvesting. Can J Plant Sci 63:157–168
Frank AB, Harris DG, Willis WO (1974) Windbreak influence on water relations, growth, and yield of soybeans. Crop Sci 14:761–765
Hama A, Hayazaki Y, Mochizuki A, Tsuruoka Y, Tanaka K, Kondoh A (2016) Rice growth monitoring using small UAV and SfM-MVS technique. J Jpn Soc Hydrol Water Resour 29:44–54 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Hayashi T, Makino T, Sato N, Deguchi K (2015) Barrenness and changes in tassel development and flowering habit of hybrid maize associated with low air temperatures. Plant Prod Sci 18:93–98
Hodges L, Suratman MN, Brandle JM, Hubbard KG (2004) Growth and yield of snap beans as affected by wind protection and microclimate changes due to shelterbelts and planting dates. HortScience 39:996–1004
Ishitsuka N, Makino T (2013) Trial of silage corn fields detection using ALOS/PALSAR data. J Jpn Agric Syst Soc 29:75–80 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Johnson RR, McClure KE, Johnson LJ, Klosterman EW, Triplett GB (1966) Corn plant maturity. I. Changes in dry matter and protein distribution in corn plants. Agron J 58:151–153
Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22(23):165–190
Maki M, Katsura K, Kazuo O (2016) Comparison of empirical regression models for estimating LAI of paddy rice from several vegetation indices derived from UAV images. J Remote Sens Soc Jpn 36:100–106 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Martin KL, Girma K, Freeman KW, Teal RK, Tubańa B, Arnall DB, Chung B, Walsh O, Solie JB, Stone ML, Raun WR (2007) Expression of variability in corn as influenced by growth stage using optical sensor measurements. Agron J 99:384–389
Mkhabela MS, Mkhabela MS, Mashinini NN (2005) Early maize yield forecasting in the four agro-ecological regions of Swaziland using NDVI data derived from NOAA’s-AVHRR. Agric For Meteorol 129:1–9
Muchow RC, Carberry PS (1989) Environmental control of phenology and leaf growth in a tropically adapted maize. Field Crops Res 20:221–236
Osaki K (2015) Appropriate luminance for estimating vegetation index from digital camera images. Bull Soc Sci Photogr Jpn 25:31–37
Oshita T, Takayama H, Otsuka H, Igarashi H, Nonaka K, Kume S (2007) Effects of maturing stage of corn hybrids on silage yield, feeding value for dairy cows and milk production in a cold region of Japan. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 20:511–516
Peri PL, Bloomberg M (2002) Windbreaks in southern Patagonia, Argentina: a review of research on growth models, windspeed reduction, and effects on crops. Agrofor Syst 56:129–144
Quarmby NA, Milnes M, Hindle TL, Silleos N (1993) The use of multi-temporal NDVI measurements from AVHRR data for crop yield estimation and prediction. Int J Remote Sens 14:199–210
R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Raun W, Solie J, Martin K, Freeman K, Stone M, Johnson G, Mullen R (2005) Growth stage, development, and spatial variability in corn evaluated using optical sensor readings. J Plant Nutr 28:173–182
Rivest D, Vézina A (2015) Maize yield patterns on the leeward side of tree windbreaks are site-specific and depend on rainfall conditions in eastern Canada. Agrofor Syst 89:237–246
Sankaran S, Khot LR, Espinoza CZ, Jarolmasjed S, Sathuvalli VR, Vandemark GJ, Miklas PN, Carter AH, Pumphrey MO, Knowles RRN, Pavek MJ (2015) Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: a review. Eur J Agron 70:112–123
Sun D, Dickinson GR (1997) Early growth of six native Australian tree species in windbreaks and their effect on potato growth in tropical northern Australia. For Ecol Manag 95:21–34
Swan JB, Schneider EC, Moncrief JF, Paulson WH, Peterson AE (1987) Estimating corn growth, yield, and grain moisture from air growing degree days and residue cover. Agron J 79:53–60
Tomari I, Ishiguro T, Fujiwara T (1980) Effect of windbreaks on the improvement of microclimatic conditions in paddy fields. Res Bull Hokkaido Natl Agric Exp Stn 127:31–76 (in Japanese with English summary)
Torita H, Satou H (2007) Relationship between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction. Agric For Meteorol 145:186–194
Tsuji O, Muneoka T, Fujiwara K (2002) The significance of windbreaks in the Tokachi region, Hokkaido. In: Proceedings of 12th Int Soil Conserv Organ Conf, pp 296–299
Wiersma DW, Carter PR, Albrecht KA, Coors JG (1993) Kernel milkline stage and corn forage yield, quality, and dry matter content. J Prod Agric 6:94–99
Wilson DR, Muchow RC, Murgatroyd CJ (1995) Model analysis of temperature and solar radiation limitations to maize potential productivity in a cool climate. Field Crops Res 43:1–18
Zhang D, Brandle JR, Hodges L, Daningsih E, Hubbard KG (1999) The response of muskmelon growth and development to microclimate modification by shelterbelts. HortScience 34:64–68
Zheng X, Zhu J, Xing Z (2016) Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China. Agric Syst 143:49–60
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Yukihiro Bannae and Osamu Oki for the assistance of field survey. We are also grateful to Hideo Wada and Jun’ichi Ono for the establishment of study site. We thank Taku Hayashi and Tsukasa Makino for their advice on survey of maize yield and Hajime Sato and Kazuhiko Masaka for their helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iwasaki, K., Torita, H., Abe, T. et al. Spatial pattern of windbreak effects on maize growth evaluated by an unmanned aerial vehicle in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Agroforest Syst 93, 1133–1145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0217-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0217-7