Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon dynamics in cocoa agroforestry systems in Central Cameroon: afforestation of savannah as a sequestration opportunity

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 06 February 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Afforestation of savannah is suggested as an approach to help addressing climate change mitigation through increased carbon (C) storage. Previous studies in Central Cameroon evidenced farmers’ ability to realize afforestation by establishing cocoa-based agroforestry systems (cAFS) on humid savannah. In this forest-savannah transition zone, we studied an 80 years chronosequence of cAFS to assess C dynamics. We selected cAFS established after forest or savannah, and we used local forest and savannah patches as controls. Aboveground carbon (AGC) was highest in the forests (118 Mg C ha−1) and lowest in the savannahs (8 Mg C ha−1). Systems established after forest (F-cAFS) revealed a mean AGC 40% lower than that of forests and did not evolve with time. The AGC of cAFS established after savannah (S-cAFS) increased with time and reached the mean AGC of F-cAFS (72 Mg C ha−1) after ca. 75 years. Soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration depended on clay content (R2 = 0.55, P < 0.001). The SOC concentration of F-cAFS did not evolve with time and revealed no difference with forest. In S-cAFS, considering a time of about 80 years after afforestation, the average annual increase in SOC concentration in the 0–15 cm layer ranged from 7.3‰ in soils with low clay content (10–15%) (R2 = 0.60, P < 0.01) to 9.5‰ in soils with higher clay content (20–25%). No significant change in SOC concentration was found for the 15–30 cm layer. Overall, S-cAFS revealed to store and maintain significant levels of C both in the aboveground biomass and in the soil. Such an afforestation thus appeared as a valuable local strategy to combine cocoa and other perennial plant productions with C storage while avoiding deforestation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 06 February 2018

    The published on-line ms “Carbon dynamics of cocoa agroforestry systems in Central Cameroon: afforestation of savannah as a sequestration opportunity.”

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the AFS4FOOD (EuropeAid/130-741/D/ACT/ACP) and SAFSE (CIRAD, IRD) projects as well as by CIRAD (French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development) and IRAD (Institute of Agricultural Research for Development of Cameroon). This research was conducted within the Research and Training Platform “DP Agroforestry Cameroon”. We thank A. Agoume and J.P. Bidias, our field assistants in Bokito, and E. Bouambi, research technician at IRAD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Annemarijn Nijmeijer or Stéphane Saj.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Number of individuals counted per past land-use in plots (800 m2 and 2400 m2) corresponding to the DBH of the trees

Latin name

S-cAFS; n = 16

F-cAFS; n = 14

Forest control n = 5

Savannah control n = 5

Albizia adianthifolia

3

6

8

 

Alchornea cordifolia

  

1

 

Annona muricata

1

   

Annona senegalensis

   

8

Anthocleista schweinfurthii

2

   

Anthonotha macrophylla

  

10

 

Blighia sp.

  

4

 

Bridelia ferruginea

   

31

Bridelia micrantha

1

3

6

 

Canarium schweinfurthii

5

 

2

 

Carapa procera

 

4

2

 

Carica papaya

4

1

  

Ceiba pentandra

13

13

7

 

Celtis gomphophylla

 

1

5

 

Celtis mildbraedii

  

1

 

Chrysophyllum africanum

1

2

  

Chytranthus macrobotrys

  

1

 

Citrus grandis

 

2

  

Citrus reticulata

3

3

  

Citrus sinensis

13

27

  

Cleistophalis glauca

2

   

Coelocaryon preussii

2

   

Coffea arabica

  

1

 

Cola caricifolia

1

   

Cola flavo-velutina

1

 

1

 

Cola lepidota

3

   

Cola millenii

1

3

4

 

Cola nitida

13

21

  

Cordia platythyrsa

 

3

1

 

Dacryodes edulis

44

19

1

 

Dacryodes macrophylla

4

1

  

Dracaena cerasifera

 

3

  

Elaeis guineensis

18

7

24

1

Elaeophorbia drupifera

1

2

1

 

Entandrophragma cylindricum

1

4

  

Erythrophleum ivorense

1

3

1

 

Fernandoa adolfi-friderici

 

1

4

 

Ficus exasperata

2

1

  

Ficus mucuso

3

1

1

1

Ficus sur

2

 

1

 

Ficus vogeliana

   

3

Funtumia elastica

  

6

 

Guibourtia demeusei

  

5

 

Guibourtia tessmannii

 

14

7

 

Hevea brasiliensis

 

4

3

 

Indetermined

18

24

59

25

Kigelia africana

1

   

Lophira lanceolata

  

3

 

Mallotus oppositifolius

  

14

 

Mangifera indica

28

2

2

 

Microcos sp.

 

3

13

 

Milicia excelsa

6

9

7

 

Millettia macrophylla

  

3

 

Musa acuminata

43

109

4

 

Musa paradisiaca

 

3

  

Musanga cecropioides

  

1

 

Myrianthus arboreus

  

4

 

Newbouldia laevis

8

6

2

 

Olax subscorpioidea

  

20

 

Persea americana

10

12

  

Phyllanthus discoideus

 

1

8

 

Piptadeniastrum africanum

 

1

5

 

Pseudospondias microcarpa

1

1

1

 

Psidium guajava

2

  

1

Pterocarpus soyauxii

 

1

  

Pycnanthus angolensis

 

1

  

Rauvolfia vomitoria

2

   

Ricinodendron heudelotii

3

5

4

 

Spathodea campanulata

1

2

1

 

Spondias dulcis

1

   

Terminalia glaucescens

   

21

Terminalia ivorensis

  

1

 

Terminalia superba

 

5

2

 

Tetrapleura tetraptera

  

1

 

Trichilia rubescens

 

14

14

 

Trilepisium madagascariense

1

5

12

 

Triplochiton scleroxylon

 

4

8

 

Vitex grandifolia

1

 

3

 

Voacanga africana

 

1

4

 

Appendix 2: Raw data

Nr

Past land-use

Age

AGC—cocoa (Mg/ha)

AGC—associated perennial plants (Mg/ha)

SOC concentration (0–15 cm)

Clay concentration (0–15 cm)

SOC concentration (15–30 cm)

Clay concentration (15–30 cm)

1

Forest

0

0.0

107.9

17.3

27.5

10.7

30.7

2

Forest

2

0.2

72.3

15.9

17.2

9.5

17.5

3

Forest

7

3.5

10.7

19.4

25.3

14.9

22.5

4

Forest

10

3.7

91.2

26.4

26.1

15.1

30.1

5

Forest

12

2.7

19.8

18.8

17.9

13.2

20.1

6

Forest

15

7.0

49.8

14.6

9.5

9.4

10.0

7

Forest

20

9.3

67.6

16.5

16.0

9.4

20.3

8

Forest

23

2.3

102.4

29.6

19.9

15.7

16.0

9

Forest

31

6.5

15.0

15.7

17.8

9.7

17.9

10

Forest

33

10.8

51.2

21.1

27.4

13.0

26.9

11

Forest

43

13.1

83.2

16.3

21.9

15.4

25.9

12

Forest

45

10.4

73.7

15.5

22.6

10.3

28.3

13

Forest

55

13.8

72.4

18.3

24.5

12.3

20.2

14

Forest

62

7.0

137.0

16.4

13.5

9.2

15.2

15

Forest control

0

165.9

15.3

11.7

9.6

9.8

16

Forest control

0

105.9

28.2

29.6

21.3

30.8

17

Forest control

0

92.5

15.9

11.9

12.4

10.9

18

Forest control

0

113.7

15.4

24.0

13.4

21.6

19

Forest control

0

114.2

17.1

16.3

13.2

18.9

20

Savannah

0

0.0

1.8

9.8

12.8

8.2

15.5

21

Savannah

2

0.1

14.8

9.0

13.5

8.5

13.5

22

Savannah

7

2.6

29.4

11.0

9.8

9.5

12.1

23

Savannah

15

3.6

13.7

12.9

9.9

12.3

12.1

24

Savannah

17

7.1

16.2

13.8

10.5

11.8

12.2

25

Savannah

26

7.3

49.7

17.8

23.5

10.3

26.0

26

Savannah

33

6.7

77.7

14.2

11.0

9.7

13.9

27

Savannah

42

6.0

22.7

20.6

22.0

18.1

22.0

28

Savannah

45

8.6

49.7

18.3

12.2

10.8

13.9

29

Savannah

46

12.0

26.5

13.0

14.8

9.3

12.4

30

Savannah

55

6.6

21.8

16.4

12.4

13.9

14.8

31

Savannah

61

7.7

45.8

14.6

14.5

10.3

22.3

32

Savannah

67

10.5

139.4

32.3

24.3

18.8

22.2

33

Savannah

75

12.3

73.1

15.1

9.8

10.1

10.0

34

Savannah

80

9.8

37.0

20.8

20.5

14.6

20.1

35

Savannah

81

7.6

80.9

26.0

19.6

15.3

24.1

36

Savannah control

0

6.4

14.7

33.9

12.5

32.8

37

Savannah control

0

3.5

13.8

36.2

13.8

36.2

38

Savannah control

0

4.7

12.0

11.5

9.2

11.8

39

Savannah control

0

12.2

14.8

11.0

23.6

40

Savannah control

0

19.2

10.6

14.6

9.2

17.8

41

Savannah control

0

7.3

10.2

13.6

11.3

25.0

42

Savannah control averagea

0

11.3

13.6

10.2

19.6

43

Savannah control averagea

0

14.3

35.1

13.2

34.5

  1. aCorresponding to the begin points of the high and low clay of the S-cAFS calculated out of the average of the savannah control plots

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nijmeijer, A., Lauri, PÉ., Harmand, JM. et al. Carbon dynamics in cocoa agroforestry systems in Central Cameroon: afforestation of savannah as a sequestration opportunity. Agroforest Syst 93, 851–868 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0182-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0182-6

Keywords

Navigation