Abstract
Afforestation of savannah is suggested as an approach to help addressing climate change mitigation through increased carbon (C) storage. Previous studies in Central Cameroon evidenced farmers’ ability to realize afforestation by establishing cocoa-based agroforestry systems (cAFS) on humid savannah. In this forest-savannah transition zone, we studied an 80 years chronosequence of cAFS to assess C dynamics. We selected cAFS established after forest or savannah, and we used local forest and savannah patches as controls. Aboveground carbon (AGC) was highest in the forests (118 Mg C ha−1) and lowest in the savannahs (8 Mg C ha−1). Systems established after forest (F-cAFS) revealed a mean AGC 40% lower than that of forests and did not evolve with time. The AGC of cAFS established after savannah (S-cAFS) increased with time and reached the mean AGC of F-cAFS (72 Mg C ha−1) after ca. 75 years. Soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration depended on clay content (R2 = 0.55, P < 0.001). The SOC concentration of F-cAFS did not evolve with time and revealed no difference with forest. In S-cAFS, considering a time of about 80 years after afforestation, the average annual increase in SOC concentration in the 0–15 cm layer ranged from 7.3‰ in soils with low clay content (10–15%) (R2 = 0.60, P < 0.01) to 9.5‰ in soils with higher clay content (20–25%). No significant change in SOC concentration was found for the 15–30 cm layer. Overall, S-cAFS revealed to store and maintain significant levels of C both in the aboveground biomass and in the soil. Such an afforestation thus appeared as a valuable local strategy to combine cocoa and other perennial plant productions with C storage while avoiding deforestation.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10457-017-0182-6/MediaObjects/10457_2017_182_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10457-017-0182-6/MediaObjects/10457_2017_182_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10457-017-0182-6/MediaObjects/10457_2017_182_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10457-017-0182-6/MediaObjects/10457_2017_182_Fig4_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
06 February 2018
The published on-line ms “Carbon dynamics of cocoa agroforestry systems in Central Cameroon: afforestation of savannah as a sequestration opportunity.”
References
Ait Kadi M, Badraoui M, Soual M et al (2016) The initiative for the adaptation of African agriculture to climate change (AAA). Initiative adaptation of African agriculture, Bonn, pp 1–23
Asari N, Suratman MN, Jafaar J, Khalid MM (2013) Estimation of aboveground biomass for oil palm plantations using allometric equations. Int Proc Chem Biol Environ Eng 58:110–114
Asase A, Tetteh DA (2015) Tree diversity, carbon stocks, and soil nutrients in cocoa-dominated and mixed food crops agroforestry systems compared to natural forest in Southeast Ghana. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2015.1110223
Barbosa RI, Fearnside PM (2005) Above-ground biomass and the fate of carbon after burning in the savannas of Roraima, Brazilian Amazonia. For Ecol Manag 216:295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.042
Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ et al (2014) IPCC, 2014: climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Beer J, Bonnemann A, Chavez W et al (1990) Modelling agroforestry systems of cacao (Theobroma cacao) with laures (Cordia alliodora) or poro (Erythrina poeppigiana) in Costa Rica. Agrofor Syst 12:229–249
Bouyoucos GJ (1951) A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agron J 43:434–438
Boyer J (1973) Cycles de la matière organique et des éléments minéraux dans une cacaoyère Camerounaise. Café Cacao Thé 17:3–24
Carsan S, Orwa C, Harwood C et al (2012) African wood density database. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S et al (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x
Dawoe EK, Quashie-Sam JS, Oppong SK (2014) Effect of land-use conversion from forest to cocoa agroforest on soil characteristics and quality of a Ferric Lixisol in lowland humid Ghana. Agrofor Syst 88:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9658-1
De Beenhouwer M, Geeraert L, Mertens J et al (2016) Biodiversity and carbon storage co-benefits of coffee agroforestry across a gradient of increasing management intensity in the SW Ethiopian highlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 222:193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.017
DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M (2010) Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 3:178–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo756
Don A, Schumacher J, Freibauer A (2011) Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks—a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 17:1658–1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x
Duguma B, Gockowski J, Bakala J (2001) Smallholder cacao (Theobroma cacao Linn.) cultivation in agroforestry systems of West and Central Africa: challenges and opportunities. Agrofor Syst 51:177–188
Elangwe HN (1979) Carte géologique de la République du Cameroun Echelle 1:1 000 000. Ministère des mines l’eau l’énergie la République du Cameroun, Yaoundé
Epron D, Marsden C, M’Bou AT et al (2009) Soil carbon dynamics following afforestation of a tropical savannah with Eucalyptus in Congo. Plant Soil 323:309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9939-7
Freycon V (2017) Diagnostic des sols de Bakoa sous cacaoyères (Cameroun)
Gama-Rodrigues EF, Ramachandran Nair PK, Nair VD et al (2010) Carbon storage in soil size fractions under two cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia, Brazil. Environ Manag 45:274–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9420-7
Gockowski J, Ndoumbé M (2004) The adoption of intensive monocrop horticulture in southern Cameroon. Agric Econ 30:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agecon.2002.11.002
Gockowski J, Sonwa D (2011) Cocoa intensification scenarios and their predicted impact on CO2 emissions, biodiversity conservation, and rural livelihoods in the Guinea rain forest of West Africa. Environ Manag 48:307–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9602-3
Gockowski J, Weise S, Sonwa D, et al (2004) Conservation because it pays: shaded cocoa agroforests in West Africa. Paper Presented at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington DC on February 10, 2004 at a symposium titled ‘the science behind cocoa’s benefits’, p 29
Guillet B, Achoundong G, Happi JY et al (2001) Agreement between floristic and soil organic carbon isotope (13C/12C, 14C) indicators of forest invasion of savannas during the last century in Cameroon. J Trop Ecol 17:809–832. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467401001614
Hairiah K, Sitompul S, van Noordwijk M, Palm C (2001) Methods for sampling carbon stocks above and below ground. ICRAF, Bogor, pp 1–23
Heanes DL (1984) Determination of total organic-C in soils by an improved chromic acid digestion and spectrophotometric procedure. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:1191–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628409367551
Hosonuma N, Herold M, De Sy V et al (2012) An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ Res Lett 7:44009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009
Hu YL, Zeng DH, Fan ZP et al (2008) Changes in ecosystem carbon stocks following grassland afforestation of semiarid sandy soil in the southeastern Keerqin Sandy Lands, China. J Arid Environ 72:2193–2200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.07.007
Isaac ME, Timmer VR, Quashie-Sam SJ (2007) Shade tree effects in an 8-year-old cocoa agroforestry system: biomass and nutrient diagnosis of Theobroma cacao by vector analysis. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78:155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9081-3
Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbágy EG et al (2002) Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418:623–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00910
Jagoret P, Michel-Dounias I, Malézieux E (2011) Long-term dynamics of cocoa agroforests: a case study in central Cameroon. Agrofor Syst 81:267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9368-x
Jagoret P, Michel-Dounias I, Snoeck D et al (2012) Afforestation of savannah with cocoa agroforestry systems: a small-farmer innovation in central Cameroon. Agrofor Syst 86:493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9513-9
Jagoret P, Kwesseu J, Messie C et al (2014) Farmers’ assessment of the use value of agrobiodiversity in complex cocoa agroforestry systems in central Cameroon. Agrofor Syst 88:983–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9698-1
Jones A, Breuning-Madsen H, Brossard M et al (2013) Soil Atlas of Africa. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Kearsley E, Moonen PC, Hufkens K et al (2017) Model performance of tree height-diameter relationships in the central Congo Basin. Ann For Sci 74:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0611-0
Kleinman PJ, Pimentel D, Bryant RB (1995) The ecological sustainability of slash-and-burn agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 52:235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(94)00531-I
Knicker H (2007) How does fire affect the nature and stability of soil organic nitrogen and carbon? A review. Biogeochemistry 85:91–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9104-4
Kotto-Same J, Woomer PL, Appolinaire M, Louis Z (1997) Carbon dynamics in slash-and-burn agriculture and land use alternatives of the humid forest zone in Cameroon. Agric Ecosyst Environ 65:245–256
Lipper L, Thornton P, Campbell BM et al (2014) Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat Clim Chang 4:1068–1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2437
Lorenz K, Lal R (2014) Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:443–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0212-y
Magalhães TM, Seifert T (2015) Tree component biomass expansion factors and root-to-shoot ratio of Lebombo ironwood: measurement uncertainty. Carbon Balance Manag 10:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-015-0019-4
Minasny B, Malone BP, McBratney AB et al (2017) Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292:59–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002
Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295
Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Haile SG (2009) Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: a feasibility appraisal. Environ Sci Policy 12:1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.010
Ngobo M, McDonald M, Weise S (2004) Impacts of type of fallow and invasion by Chromolaena odorata on weed communities in crop fields in Cameroon. Ecology and Society 9:1–15
Njomgang R, Yemefack M, Nounamo L, Moukam A (2011) Dynamics of shifting agricultural systems and organic carbon sequestration in Southern Cameroon. Tropicultura 29:176–182
Norgrove L, Hauser S (2013) Carbon stocks in shaded Theobroma cacao farms and adjacent secondary forests of similar age in Cameroon. Trop Ecol 54:15–22
Palm CA, van Noordwijk M, Woomer PL et al (2005) Carbon losses and sequestration with land use change in the humid tropics. In: Palm CA, Vosti SA, Sanchez PA, Ericksen PJ (eds) Slash-and-burn agriculture—the search for alternatives. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 41–63
Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J et al (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609
Rahman SA, Rahman MF, Sunderland T (2012) Causes and consequences of shifting cultivation and its alternative in the hill tracts of eastern Bangladesh. Agrofor Syst 84:141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9422-3
Robert M (2001) Soil carbon sequestration for improved land management. World soil resources reports. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/a-bl001e.pdf
Ruf F, Schroth G (2004) Chocolate forests and monocultures: a historical review of cocoa growing and its conflicting role in tropical deforestation and forest conservation. In: Schroth G, da Fonseca GAB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos HL, Izac A-MN (eds) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 107–134
Ruf F, Schroth G, Doffangui K (2015) Climate change, cocoa migrations and deforestation in West Africa: what does the past tell us about the future? Sustain Sci 10:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0282-4
Saj S, Jagoret P, Todem Ngogue H (2013) Carbon storage and density dynamics of associated trees in three contrasting Theobroma cacao agroforests of Central Cameroon. Agrofor Syst 87:1309–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9639-4
Saj S, Durot C, Mvondo Sakouma K et al (2017) Contribution of associated trees to long-term species conservation, carbon storage and sustainability: a functional analysis of tree communities in cacao plantations of Central Cameroon. Int J Agric Sustain 15(3):282–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1311764
Sankaran M, Hanan NP, Scholes RJ et al (2005) Determinants of woody cover in African savannas. Nature 438:846–849. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04070
Schroth G, Läderach P, Martinez-Valle AI et al (2016) Vulnerability to climate change of cocoa in West Africa: patterns, opportunities and limits to adaptation. Sci Total Environ 556:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.024
Silatsa FBT, Yemefack M, Ewane-Nonga N et al (2016) Modeling carbon stock dynamics under fallow and cocoa agroforest systems in the shifting agricultural landscape of Central Cameroon. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9973-4
Sonwa DJ, Nkongmeneck BA, Weise SF et al (2007) Diversity of plants in cocoa agroforests in the humid forest zone of Southern Cameroon. Biodivers Conserv 16:2385–2400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9187-1
Sonwa DJ, Weise SF, Nkongmeneck BA et al (2016) Structure and composition of cocoa agroforests in the humid forest zone of Southern Cameroon. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9942-y
Takoutsing B, Weber JC, Tchoundjeu Z, Shepherd K (2016) Soil chemical properties dynamics as affected by land use change in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. Agrofor Syst 90:1089–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9885-8
Vargas R, Allen MF, Allen EB (2008) Biomass and carbon accumulation in a fire chronosequence of a seasonally dry tropical forest. Glob Chang Biol 14:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01462.x
Wall A, Hytönen J (2005) Soil fertility of afforested arable land compared to continuously forested sites. Plant Soil 275:247–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-1869-4
Wood GAR, Lass RA (2001) Cocoa, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford
Yemefack M, Rossiter DG, Njomgang R (2005) Multi-scale characterization of soil variability within an agricultural landscape mosaic system in southern Cameroon. Geoderma 125:117–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.07.007
Zhang Q, Justice CO, Desanker PV (2002) Impacts of simulated shifting cultivation on deforestation and the carbon stocks of the forests of central Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90:203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00332-2
Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Bossio DA, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.014
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the AFS4FOOD (EuropeAid/130-741/D/ACT/ACP) and SAFSE (CIRAD, IRD) projects as well as by CIRAD (French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development) and IRAD (Institute of Agricultural Research for Development of Cameroon). This research was conducted within the Research and Training Platform “DP Agroforestry Cameroon”. We thank A. Agoume and J.P. Bidias, our field assistants in Bokito, and E. Bouambi, research technician at IRAD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Appendices
Appendix 1: Number of individuals counted per past land-use in plots (800 m2 and 2400 m2) corresponding to the DBH of the trees
Latin name | S-cAFS; n = 16 | F-cAFS; n = 14 | Forest control n = 5 | Savannah control n = 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Albizia adianthifolia | 3 | 6 | 8 | |
Alchornea cordifolia | 1 | |||
Annona muricata | 1 | |||
Annona senegalensis | 8 | |||
Anthocleista schweinfurthii | 2 | |||
Anthonotha macrophylla | 10 | |||
Blighia sp. | 4 | |||
Bridelia ferruginea | 31 | |||
Bridelia micrantha | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
Canarium schweinfurthii | 5 | 2 | ||
Carapa procera | 4 | 2 | ||
Carica papaya | 4 | 1 | ||
Ceiba pentandra | 13 | 13 | 7 | |
Celtis gomphophylla | 1 | 5 | ||
Celtis mildbraedii | 1 | |||
Chrysophyllum africanum | 1 | 2 | ||
Chytranthus macrobotrys | 1 | |||
Citrus grandis | 2 | |||
Citrus reticulata | 3 | 3 | ||
Citrus sinensis | 13 | 27 | ||
Cleistophalis glauca | 2 | |||
Coelocaryon preussii | 2 | |||
Coffea arabica | 1 | |||
Cola caricifolia | 1 | |||
Cola flavo-velutina | 1 | 1 | ||
Cola lepidota | 3 | |||
Cola millenii | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Cola nitida | 13 | 21 | ||
Cordia platythyrsa | 3 | 1 | ||
Dacryodes edulis | 44 | 19 | 1 | |
Dacryodes macrophylla | 4 | 1 | ||
Dracaena cerasifera | 3 | |||
Elaeis guineensis | 18 | 7 | 24 | 1 |
Elaeophorbia drupifera | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
Entandrophragma cylindricum | 1 | 4 | ||
Erythrophleum ivorense | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
Fernandoa adolfi-friderici | 1 | 4 | ||
Ficus exasperata | 2 | 1 | ||
Ficus mucuso | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Ficus sur | 2 | 1 | ||
Ficus vogeliana | 3 | |||
Funtumia elastica | 6 | |||
Guibourtia demeusei | 5 | |||
Guibourtia tessmannii | 14 | 7 | ||
Hevea brasiliensis | 4 | 3 | ||
Indetermined | 18 | 24 | 59 | 25 |
Kigelia africana | 1 | |||
Lophira lanceolata | 3 | |||
Mallotus oppositifolius | 14 | |||
Mangifera indica | 28 | 2 | 2 | |
Microcos sp. | 3 | 13 | ||
Milicia excelsa | 6 | 9 | 7 | |
Millettia macrophylla | 3 | |||
Musa acuminata | 43 | 109 | 4 | |
Musa paradisiaca | 3 | |||
Musanga cecropioides | 1 | |||
Myrianthus arboreus | 4 | |||
Newbouldia laevis | 8 | 6 | 2 | |
Olax subscorpioidea | 20 | |||
Persea americana | 10 | 12 | ||
Phyllanthus discoideus | 1 | 8 | ||
Piptadeniastrum africanum | 1 | 5 | ||
Pseudospondias microcarpa | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Psidium guajava | 2 | 1 | ||
Pterocarpus soyauxii | 1 | |||
Pycnanthus angolensis | 1 | |||
Rauvolfia vomitoria | 2 | |||
Ricinodendron heudelotii | 3 | 5 | 4 | |
Spathodea campanulata | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
Spondias dulcis | 1 | |||
Terminalia glaucescens | 21 | |||
Terminalia ivorensis | 1 | |||
Terminalia superba | 5 | 2 | ||
Tetrapleura tetraptera | 1 | |||
Trichilia rubescens | 14 | 14 | ||
Trilepisium madagascariense | 1 | 5 | 12 | |
Triplochiton scleroxylon | 4 | 8 | ||
Vitex grandifolia | 1 | 3 | ||
Voacanga africana | 1 | 4 |
Appendix 2: Raw data
Nr | Past land-use | Age | AGC—cocoa (Mg/ha) | AGC—associated perennial plants (Mg/ha) | SOC concentration (0–15 cm) | Clay concentration (0–15 cm) | SOC concentration (15–30 cm) | Clay concentration (15–30 cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Forest | 0 | 0.0 | 107.9 | 17.3 | 27.5 | 10.7 | 30.7 |
2 | Forest | 2 | 0.2 | 72.3 | 15.9 | 17.2 | 9.5 | 17.5 |
3 | Forest | 7 | 3.5 | 10.7 | 19.4 | 25.3 | 14.9 | 22.5 |
4 | Forest | 10 | 3.7 | 91.2 | 26.4 | 26.1 | 15.1 | 30.1 |
5 | Forest | 12 | 2.7 | 19.8 | 18.8 | 17.9 | 13.2 | 20.1 |
6 | Forest | 15 | 7.0 | 49.8 | 14.6 | 9.5 | 9.4 | 10.0 |
7 | Forest | 20 | 9.3 | 67.6 | 16.5 | 16.0 | 9.4 | 20.3 |
8 | Forest | 23 | 2.3 | 102.4 | 29.6 | 19.9 | 15.7 | 16.0 |
9 | Forest | 31 | 6.5 | 15.0 | 15.7 | 17.8 | 9.7 | 17.9 |
10 | Forest | 33 | 10.8 | 51.2 | 21.1 | 27.4 | 13.0 | 26.9 |
11 | Forest | 43 | 13.1 | 83.2 | 16.3 | 21.9 | 15.4 | 25.9 |
12 | Forest | 45 | 10.4 | 73.7 | 15.5 | 22.6 | 10.3 | 28.3 |
13 | Forest | 55 | 13.8 | 72.4 | 18.3 | 24.5 | 12.3 | 20.2 |
14 | Forest | 62 | 7.0 | 137.0 | 16.4 | 13.5 | 9.2 | 15.2 |
15 | Forest control | 0 | – | 165.9 | 15.3 | 11.7 | 9.6 | 9.8 |
16 | Forest control | 0 | – | 105.9 | 28.2 | 29.6 | 21.3 | 30.8 |
17 | Forest control | 0 | – | 92.5 | 15.9 | 11.9 | 12.4 | 10.9 |
18 | Forest control | 0 | – | 113.7 | 15.4 | 24.0 | 13.4 | 21.6 |
19 | Forest control | 0 | – | 114.2 | 17.1 | 16.3 | 13.2 | 18.9 |
20 | Savannah | 0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 9.8 | 12.8 | 8.2 | 15.5 |
21 | Savannah | 2 | 0.1 | 14.8 | 9.0 | 13.5 | 8.5 | 13.5 |
22 | Savannah | 7 | 2.6 | 29.4 | 11.0 | 9.8 | 9.5 | 12.1 |
23 | Savannah | 15 | 3.6 | 13.7 | 12.9 | 9.9 | 12.3 | 12.1 |
24 | Savannah | 17 | 7.1 | 16.2 | 13.8 | 10.5 | 11.8 | 12.2 |
25 | Savannah | 26 | 7.3 | 49.7 | 17.8 | 23.5 | 10.3 | 26.0 |
26 | Savannah | 33 | 6.7 | 77.7 | 14.2 | 11.0 | 9.7 | 13.9 |
27 | Savannah | 42 | 6.0 | 22.7 | 20.6 | 22.0 | 18.1 | 22.0 |
28 | Savannah | 45 | 8.6 | 49.7 | 18.3 | 12.2 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
29 | Savannah | 46 | 12.0 | 26.5 | 13.0 | 14.8 | 9.3 | 12.4 |
30 | Savannah | 55 | 6.6 | 21.8 | 16.4 | 12.4 | 13.9 | 14.8 |
31 | Savannah | 61 | 7.7 | 45.8 | 14.6 | 14.5 | 10.3 | 22.3 |
32 | Savannah | 67 | 10.5 | 139.4 | 32.3 | 24.3 | 18.8 | 22.2 |
33 | Savannah | 75 | 12.3 | 73.1 | 15.1 | 9.8 | 10.1 | 10.0 |
34 | Savannah | 80 | 9.8 | 37.0 | 20.8 | 20.5 | 14.6 | 20.1 |
35 | Savannah | 81 | 7.6 | 80.9 | 26.0 | 19.6 | 15.3 | 24.1 |
36 | Savannah control | 0 | – | 6.4 | 14.7 | 33.9 | 12.5 | 32.8 |
37 | Savannah control | 0 | – | 3.5 | 13.8 | 36.2 | 13.8 | 36.2 |
38 | Savannah control | 0 | – | 4.7 | 12.0 | 11.5 | 9.2 | 11.8 |
39 | Savannah control | 0 | – | – | 12.2 | 14.8 | 11.0 | 23.6 |
40 | Savannah control | 0 | – | 19.2 | 10.6 | 14.6 | 9.2 | 17.8 |
41 | Savannah control | 0 | – | 7.3 | 10.2 | 13.6 | 11.3 | 25.0 |
42 | Savannah control averagea | 0 | – | – | 11.3 | 13.6 | 10.2 | 19.6 |
43 | Savannah control averagea | 0 | – | – | 14.3 | 35.1 | 13.2 | 34.5 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nijmeijer, A., Lauri, PÉ., Harmand, JM. et al. Carbon dynamics in cocoa agroforestry systems in Central Cameroon: afforestation of savannah as a sequestration opportunity. Agroforest Syst 93, 851–868 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0182-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0182-6