Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Farmers accumulation strategies and agroforestry systems intensification: the example of cocoa in the central region of Cameroon over the 1910–2010 period

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agroforestry is often portrayed as one of the ways towards ecological intensification of agricultural systems. This intensification process allows rural households to sustainably increase cash revenues and capital accumulation capacity. Many research studies have focused on the technical and economic improvement of agroforestry systems (AFS). However, it is equally important to study this the other way around, hence assessing the impact of the strategies and accumulation trajectories of farmers on the intensification of AFS. The present study aims at characterizing the various accumulation strategies of farmers and assessing their relationships with AFS intensification. The study involved semi-structured interviews of 82 cocoa farmers representative of the diversity of cocoa AFS farms in Central Cameroon. The results demonstrate that the successful accumulation strategies are the ones mainly based on the development of activities and revenues of off farm and of urban origin. This capital of urban origin has led to the strong emergence of large farms (from 5 to 30 ha). Due to the influx of financial capital and the adoption of improved agricultural techniques, these large farms achieve cocoa yields much higher (512 kg/ha) than smaller farms (<2 ha, 214 kg/ha) or medium farms (2–5 ha, 338 kg/ha). Nonetheless, the preliminary data collected in the present study indicate that the higher cocoa yields achieved by large farms does not necessarily translate into a sustainable improvement of the overall productivity (i.e. cacao as well as other products originating form AFS) or that of the labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alary V (1996) Incertitude et prise de risque en période d’ajustement. Le comportement des producteurs de cacao du Cameroun avant et après 1994. Economie. Paris I-Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris, p 396

    Google Scholar 

  • AREION group (2012) Le land grabbing : la course aux terres fertiles. Carto pp 54–57

  • Assidon E (2000) L’émergence d’un nouveau domaine, l’économie du développement. In: Béraud A, Faccarello G (eds) Nouvelle histoire de la pensée économique. La Découverte, Paris, pp 487–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin GM (2005) Land, labour and capital in Ghana. University of Rochester Press, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington a (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27:2021–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux D (2005) L’enquête et ses méthodes. Le récit de vie. Armand Colin, Paris, p 128

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet J (1956) Condition des femmes dans la région cacaoyère du Cameroun. Cahiers internationaux de sociologie 20:109–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisseleua Daghela HB (2007) Ecological, social and economic determinants in cocoa production systems in southern Cameroon. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences Ph D Thesis. Georg-August University, Goettingen, p 217

  • Bosc PM, Hanak Freud H (2004) Recherche agricole et innovation en afrique tropicale. Editions QUAE, Paris, p 146

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet R (1992) Les mots de la géographie - dictionnaire critique. La documentation française, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Brycesson DF (1999) African rural labour, income diversification and livelihood approaches : a long term development perspective. ASC Working Paper 35/1999. Afrika-Studiecentrum, funded by the Dutch Ministry of Development Cooperation and by the International Labour Office., Leiden (Netherlands), p 40

  • Brycesson DF, Jamal V (1997) Farewell to farms : de-agrarianisation and employment in Africa. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Aldershot (UK), p 265

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Conway G (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Working Paper IDS, Brighton, UK, p 33

  • Charaudeau P, Maingueneau D (2002) Dictionnaire d’analyse du discours. Seuil, Paris, p 66

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier P, Lal D (1986) Labor and poverty in Kenya 1900–1980. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Courade G (1994) Le village camerounais à l’heure de l’ajustement. Karthala, Paris 406

    Google Scholar 

  • CTA (2012) Secteur du cacao. Agritrade Le commerce ACP analysé et décrypté http://agritrade.cta.int/

  • De Souza HN, De Graaff J, Pulleman M (2012) Strategies and economics of farming systems with coffe in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome. Agrofor Syst 84:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elong JG (2004) Éton et Manguissa, de la Lékié au Mbam-et-Kim : jeux et enjeux fonciers (Centre-Cameroun). Les Cahiers d’Outre-Mer Afriques: pp 1–15

  • Emery M, Flora C (2006) Spiraling-up: mapping community transformation with community capitals framework.Community development. J Community Dev Soc 37:19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans H, Ngau P (1991) Rural-urban relations, household income diversification and agricultural productivity. Dev change 22:519–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraton N, Touzard I (2009) Comprendre l’agriculture familiale. Diagnostic des systèmes de production. Quae, CTA. Presses agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux

    Google Scholar 

  • FIDA (2001) Evaluation de la pauvreté rurale. Afrique de l’Ouest et du Centre. Fond International de Développement Agricole (FIDA), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Folefack DP (2010) Pauvreté et répartition des revenus en zone cacaoyère du Cameroun. Tropicultura 28:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gafsi M (2006) Exploitation agricole et agriculture durable. Cahiers Agric 15:491–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard C, Sourisseau J-M (2009) Système de culture, système d’activité(s) et rural livelihood : enseignements issus d’une étude sur l’agriculture kanak (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Journal de la Société des Océanistes 129:279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. Agrofor Syst 61–62:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity DP, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrott S (2006) World Agroforestry into the Future. World Agroforestry Center, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggblade S, Hazell P, Brown J (1989) Farm-nonfarm linkages in rural Sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev 17:1173–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou L (2011) Un land grab chinois en afrique Sub-Saharienne ? Outre-Terre 4:151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iliffe J (1983) The emergence of African capitalism. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrige F (1994) La dynamique d’offre de cacao entre marché, conditions naturelles et institutions : interprétation à partir d’une comparaison Côte-d’Ivoire - Malaisie. Malaisie Sciences économiques, Dijon, p 720

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy P (1988) African capitalism : the struggle for ascendancy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrich C, Rehman T, Khan M (2003) Typification of farming systems for constructing representative farm models : two illustration of multi-variate analyses in Chile and Pakistan. Agric Syst 76:141–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landais E (1998) Modeling farm diversity. New approaches to typlogy building in France. Agric Syst 58:505–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw J, Lanjouw P (2001) The rural non farm sector; issues and evidence from developing countries. Agric Econ 26:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léna P (1988) Aspects de la frontière amazonienne. Cahier de l’ORSTOM, Série Sciences Humaines 22:319–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplaideur A (1989) Vie et survie domestique en zone forestière camerounaise : la reproduction simple est-elle assurée ? In: Eldin M, Milleville P (eds) Le risque en agriculture. ORSTOM, Paris, pp 227–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Losch B, Fusillier J-L, Dupraz P (1991) Stratégies des producteurs en zone caféière et cacaoyère du Cameroun. Quelles adaptations à la crise ? Collection “Documents Systèmes Agraires”. CIRAD, Montpellier, p 252

    Google Scholar 

  • Oya C (2007) Stories of rural accumulation in Africa : trajectories and transitions among rural capitalists in Senegal. J Agrarian Change 7:453–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty MG, Veiga JB, Poccard-Chapuis R, Tourrand JF (2002) Le potentiel des systèmes agroforestiers sur les fronts pionniers d’Amazonie brésilienne. Bois et forêts des tropiques 2:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokam J, Sunderlin W (1999) L’impact de la crise économique sur les populations, les migrations et le couvert forestier du Sud Cameroun. Center for international forestry research (CIFOR), Bogor, p 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon T (1997) Using evidence of household income diversification to inform study of the rural nonferm labor market in Africa. World Dev 25:735–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon T (1998) Rural non-farm income in developing countries. The state of food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugalema GH, Johnsen FH, Rugambisa J (1994) The homegarden agroforestry system of Bukoba disctrict, North-Western Tanszania. 2 Constrainsts to farm productivity. Agrofor Syst 26:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarah A, Leke Awung G, Lysinge RJ (2007) Cocoa farm in the Mount Cameroon region: biological and cultural diversity in local livelihoods. Biodiv Conser 16:2401–2427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (2009) Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. J Peasant Studies 36:171–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soini E (2005) Changing livelihoods on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania : challenges and opportunities in the Chaga homegarden system. Agrofor Syst 64:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonwa DJ, Weise SF (2008) Diversifying and intensifying the cocoa agroforest lanscape : review and strategis approaches for managing the shade matrix in West and Central Africa. STCP Working paper, Series 4. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Accra, p 60

  • Sonwa DJ, Nkongmeneck BA, Weise SF, Tchatat M, Adesina AA, Janssens MJJ (2007) Diversity of plants in cocoa agroforest in the humid forest zone of Southern Cameroon. Biodiv Conser 16:2385–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmer PC (2002) Agriculture and economic development. In: Arrow KJ, Intriligator MD (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1488–1536

    Google Scholar 

  • Varlet F, Berry D (1997) Réhabilitation de la protection phytosanitaire des cacaoyers et caféiers du Cameroun. Cirad/Conseil interprofessionnel du cacao et du café (CICC), Douala, p 204+202

  • Weber J (1974) Types de surproduit et formes d’accumulation. La province cacaoyère du centre-sud Cameroun. ORSTOM, Yaoundé, pp 69–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank resource persons and farmers of the Central Cameroon for the time dedicated to answer interviews. I also thank Dr. Philippe Vaast, Cirad/Icraf, for his scientific review and Anna Snider for her translating work of the present manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cirad, TA C-85/15, 73, rue Jean François Breton, 34398, Montpellier cedex 5, France

    Philippe Pédelahore

Authors
  1. Philippe Pédelahore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Pédelahore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pédelahore, P. Farmers accumulation strategies and agroforestry systems intensification: the example of cocoa in the central region of Cameroon over the 1910–2010 period. Agroforest Syst 88, 1157–1166 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9675-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9675-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation