Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Competitive interactions in Ginkgo and crop species mixed agroforestry systems in Jiangsu, China

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intercropping Ginkgo and crop species in southern China is receiving increasing attention because it offers potential advantages for resource utilization, higher economic income to farmers and increased sustainability in crop production, We carried out a 2-year field intercropping system composed of Ginkgo with wheat, broad bean, and rapeseed, respectively, to determine the competitive interactions between the different species, and productivity and the economic yield of each intercropping system. The density of Ginkgo and crop species was varied systematically in a two-way density matrix composed of three monoculture densities and nine intercropping of all possible pairwise combinations of monoculture densities. Intercropping systems were assessed on the basis of several intercropping indices such as land equivalent ratio, relative crowding coefficient, relative competition intensity and vector competition analysis. The results showed that the combined biomass production of the component crop species was significantly greater in the Ginkgo/crop mixtures than in monocultures crops (Ginkgo, broad bean, wheat, and rapeseed). Ginkgo: rapeseed ratio 24:12, Ginkgo: bread bean ratio 24:5, and Ginkgo: wheat ratio 24:200 had the best total biomass production. Ginkgo: rapeseed (and broad bean) ratio 24:5 and Ginkgo: wheat ratio 24:200 in respective Ginkgo/crop mixtures had the maximum economic yield. Vector competition analysis showed that Ginkgo/rapeseed mixture exhibited an antagonistic interaction type and therefore is not suitable for intercropping. Ginkgo/broad bean mixture demonstrated the most beneficial effects among the three intercropping systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cao FL, Kimmins JP, Jolliffe PA, Wang JR (2009) Relative competitive abilities and productivity in Ginkgo and broad bean and wheat mixtures in southern China. Agrofor Syst 70:369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamshama SAO, Mugasha AG, Klovstad A, Haveraaen O, Maliondo SMS (1998) Growth and yield of maize alley cropped with Leucaena leucocephala and Faidherbia albida in Morogoro. Tanzan Agrofor Syst 40:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J (1987) On the use of response models in mixture experiments. Oecologia 72:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit CT (1960) On competition. Verslaen van landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen 66:1–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou LB, Dorda CA (2007) Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crop Res 100:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firbank LG, Watkinson AR (1985a) A model of interference within plant monocultures. J Theor Biol 116:291–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firbank LG, Watkinson AR (1985b) On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plants. J Appl Ecol 22:503–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB (1995) On the measurement of plant competition intensity. Ecology 76:305–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation progresses. Wiley, New York, p 222

    Google Scholar 

  • Imo M, Timmer VR (1998) Vector competition analysis: a new approach for evaluating vegetation control methods in young black spruce plantation. Can J Soil Sci 78:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imo M, Timmer VR (2000) Vector competition analysis of a Leucaena-maize alley cropping system in western Kenya. For Ecol Manag 126:255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe PA, Minjas AN, Runeckles VC (1984) A reinterpretation of yield relationships in replacement series experiments. J Appl Ecol 21:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maghembe JA, Kaoneka ARS, Lulandala LLL (1986) Intercropping, weeding and spacing effects on growth and nutrient content in Leucaena leucocephala at Morogoro, Tanzanian. For Ecol Manag 16:269–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mead DJ, Mansur I (1993) Vector analysis of foliage data to study competition for nutrients and moisture: an agroforestry example. NZ J For Sci 23:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead R, Willey RW (1980) The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields from intercropping. Exp Agric 16:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Sharma MM, Ong CK (1990) A study of the potential of hedgerow intercropping in semi-arid India using a 2-way systematic design. Agrofor Syst 11:243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Sharma MM, Ong CK (1991) A tree-crop interface design and its use for evaluating the potential of hedgerow intercropping. Agrofor Syst 13:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek M, Robinson GR, Rejmankova E (1989) Weed-crop competition: experimental designs and models for data analysis. Weed Sci 37:276–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes T, Quiroz R, Luukkanen O (2009) Spice crop agroforestry systems in the east Usambara Mountain, Tanzania: growth analysis. Agrofor Syst 76:513–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitters CJT (1983) Alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 1. Estimation of competition effects. Neth J Agric Sci 31:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey RW (1985) Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages. Exp Agric 21:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1988) Shoot competition and root competition. J Appl Ecol 25:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SD, Keddy PA (1986) Measuring diffuse competition along an environmental gradient: results from a shoreline plant community. Am Nat 127:862–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, p 276

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor for their constructive and thoughtful comments that improved the manuscript significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, Fl., Kimmins, J.P. & Wang, J.R. Competitive interactions in Ginkgo and crop species mixed agroforestry systems in Jiangsu, China. Agroforest Syst 84, 401–415 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9485-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9485-9

Keywords

Navigation