Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil compaction by grazing livestock in silvopastures as evidenced by changes in soil physical properties

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Livestock, pasture, and timber trees are intimately interrelated in silvopastures. Most silvopasture research to date has focused on forage/animal/tree interactions, with less attention paid to animal/soil interactions in silvopastures. While a considerable body of work has been devoted to understanding the effects of livestock trampling on plants and soils in pastures, less has been done for livestock grazing in forests, and even less is available for silvopastures. Three replications of Douglas-fir forest, Douglas-fir/subclover pasture/sheep silvopasture, and subclover/sheep pasture were established in 1989 near Corvallis, Oregon USA. Pastures and silvopastures were grazed each spring during 1990–2001. These plots were sampled in 2002, after 11 years of grazing, and again in 2004 following 2 years without grazing. Soil in the silvopastures had 13% higher bulk density and 7% lower total porosity than those in adjacent forests in 2002. Most of the difference in total porosity was air-filled pores. Average water infiltration rate was 38% less in silvopastures than in forests, however total water stored in the top 6 cm of soil at field capacity was similar. Soil bulk density, total porosity, and air-filled pore space was similar for forests, pastures, and silvopastures after 2 years without livestock grazing. The infiltration rate of silvopasture soils in 2004 had increased to be similar to those of forests in 2002, however, forest soil infiltration rates also increased and continued to be higher than those of silvopastures. Plant production was not sensitive to changes in any of the soil parameters measured. Although livestock grazing did change soil infiltration rates, soil bulk density, and soil porosity, the effects were quickly reversed following cessation of grazing and had little detrimental effect on silvopasture forage or tree production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bezkorowajnyj PG, Gordon AM, McBride RA (1993) The effect of cattle foot traffic on soil compaction in a silvo-pastoral system. Agroforest Syst 21:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer H (1986) Intake rate: cylinder infiltrometer. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 825–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanasyk DS, Naeth MA (1995) Grazing impacts on bulk density and soil strength in the foothills fescue grassland of Alberta, Canada. Can J Soil Sci 75:551–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Clason TR, Sharrow SH (2000) Silvopastoral practices. In: Garrett HE, Rietveld WJ, Fisher RF (eds) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 119–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson RE, Sutherland PL (1986) Chapter 8—Porosity. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis—Part 1—Physical and mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewry JJ, Paton RJ, Monaghan RM (2004) Soil compaction and recovery cycle on a Southland dairy farm: implications for soil monitoring. Aust J Soil Res 42:851–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greacen EL, Sands R (1980) Compaction of forest soils—a review. Aust J Soil Res 18:163–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood KL, McKenzie BM (2001) Grazing effects on soil physical properties and consequences for pastures: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 41:1231–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford GF, Hawkins RH (1978) Hydrologic impact of grazing on infiltration; a critical review. Water Resour Res 14:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholz HL, Grier CC, Campbell AG, Brown AT (1979) Equations for estimating biomass and leaf area of plants in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Research Lab Research Paper 41. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, 40 pp

  • Heilman P (1981) Root penetration of Douglas-fir seedlings into compacted soil. For Sci 27:660–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Knezevich CA (1975) Soil survey of Benton County Area, Oregon. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzic M, Newman RF, Broersma K, Bomke AA (1999) Soil compaction of forest plantations in interior British Columbia. J Range Manage 52:671–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzic M, Broersma K, Newman RF, Ballard TM, Bomke AA (2001) Soil quality of harvested and grazed forest cutblocks in Southern British Columbia. J Soil Water Conserv 56:192–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei SA (2004) Soil compaction from human trampling, biking, and off-road motor vehicle activity in a blackbrush (Coleogynr ramosissima) shrubland. West N Am Nat 64:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnartz NE, Hse C-Y, Duvall VL (1966) Grazing impairs physical properties of a forest soil in central Louisiana. J For 64:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapfumo E, Chanasyk DS, Neath MA, Baron VS (1999) Soil compaction under grazing of annual and perennial forages. Can J Soil Sci 79:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • McNabb DH, Startsev AD, Nguyen H (2001) Soil wetness and traffic level effects on bulk density and air-filled porosity of compacted boreal forest soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1238–1247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minore D, Smith CE, Woolard RF (1969) Effects of high soil density on seedling root growth of eleven northwestern tree species. USDA forest service, Pacific Northwest forest and range experiment station, Research note PNW-112, 6 pp

  • Orr HK (1960) Soil porosity and bulk density on grazed and protected Kentucky bluegrass range in the Black Hills. J Range Manage 13:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt APB, Bendotti S, Howell MR, Eastham J (1993) The effect of sheep trampling and grazing on soil physical properties and pasture growth for a red-brown earth. Aust J Agric Res 44:317–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rab MA (2004) Recovery of soil physical properties from compaction and soil profile disturbance caused by logging of native forest in Victorian Central Highlands, Australia. For Ecol Manage 191:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH (1999) Silvopastoralism: competition and facilitation between trees, livestock, and improved grass-clover pastures on temperate rainfed lands. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Frenandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH (1992) Tree planting pattern effects on forage production in a Douglas-fir agroforest. Agroforest Syst 16:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH (1994) Sheep as a silvicultural management tool in temperate conifer forest. Sheep Res J 97–104 Special issue (1994)

  • Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, forests, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agroforest Syst 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Carlson DH, Emmingham WH, Lavender D (1996) Productivity of two Douglas fir/subclover/sheep agroforests compared to pasture and forest monocultures. Agroforest Syst 34:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, New York, USA, 633 pp

  • Taddese G, Mohamed Saleem MA, Ayalneh W (2002) Effect of livestock grazing on physical properties of a cracking and self-mulching vertisol. Aust J Exp Agric 42:129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate KW, Dudley DM, McDougald NK, George MR (2004) Effect of canopy and grazing on soil bulk density. J Range Manage 57:411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble SW, Mendel AC (1995) The cow as a geomorphic agent—a critical review. Geomorphology 13:233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wairiu M, Mullins CE, Campbell CD (1993) Soil physical factors affecting the growth of sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) in a silvopastoral system on a stony upland soil in North-East Scotland. Agroforest Syst 24:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler MA, Trlica MJ, Frazier GW, Reeder JD (2002) Seasonal grazing affects soil physical properties of a montane riparian community. J Range Manage 55:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Willatt ST, Pullar DM (1983) Changes in soil properties under grazed pastures. Aust J Soil Res 22:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Research was conducted under Oregon Agricultural Research Station Project 066—Agroforestry Systems for Western Oregon.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven H. Sharrow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharrow, S.H. Soil compaction by grazing livestock in silvopastures as evidenced by changes in soil physical properties. Agroforest Syst 71, 215–223 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9083-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9083-4

Keywords

Navigation