Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Financial analysis of shaded cocoa in Ghana

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cultivation of cocoa has been an important driver of tropical deforestation globally. Efforts to reverse this trend are focusing on the reintroduction of shade trees to cocoa plantations. Shade trees are valuable in enhancing biophysical conditions on cocoa (Theobroma cacao) fields and contribute to biodiversity and product diversification for smallholder producers. Participatory trials of cocoa agroforests planted with indigenous shade tree species were undertaken with farmers in the Atwima District of the Ashanti Region of Ghana, to increase tree volume on cocoa fields while improving rural livelihoods and enhancing environmental sustainability. An ex ante financial analysis of the technology was undertaken to assess its economic viability. Input–output data were collected from farmer experiments over three seasons and supplemented with data from traditional cocoa fields of varying rotation ages, and secondary data on production in later years of an eighty-year cocoa rotation. A discounted cash flow analysis was carried out to estimate the benefit-cost (B/C) ratio, net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR) and land expectation value (LEV) as well as the sensitivity to a 20% decline in cocoa prices and additional chemical costs for various shade scenarios at a 10% discount rate. It was observed that cocoa production is, in general, profitable. The change from the traditional system to one with hybrid cocoa raised the IRR from 31% to 57% with planted shade and 67% without, although extra agrochemical costs would tend to reduce the profitability of unshaded hybrid cocoa in particular. The age of maximum LEV for the various scenarios suggests that the optimum economic rotation for the hybrid cocoa is between 18 and 29 years, much less than the traditional system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adu-Ampomah Y, Frimpong EB, Abiyry MA, Ofori-Frimpong K, Opuku G, Yeboah SB (1998) Occurrence and distribution of light crop (Category G) beans in the main crop season. Report submitted to the Ghana Cocoa Board, 24 pp

  • Ahenkora Y, Akrofi GS, Adri KK (1974) The end of the cocoa shade and manuring experiments at the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana. J Horticult Sci 49:43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Anglaaere LCN (2005a) Improving the productivity and sustainability of cocoa farms in West Africa through utilization of native forest trees in agroforestry systems. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, 331 pp

  • Anglaaere LCN(2005b) Personal communication

  • Atwima District Assembly (1996) District development plan. Atwima District, Ashanti-Ghana

  • Bamfo RK (2003) Policy and institutional reform for forestry: the Ghanaian experience. Africa forest law enforcement and governance conference. October 13–16, 2003. Yaounde, Cameroon, 8 pp

  • Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in cocoa and coffee plantations. Agroforest Syst 38:139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright GA (2001) Forestry budgets and accounts. CABI, 380 pp

  • Entwistle PF (1985) Insects and cocoa. In: Wood GAR, Lass RA (eds) Cocoa. 4th edn. Longman, London and New York, pp 373–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguma B, Gockowski J, Bakala J (2001) Smallholder cacao (Theobroma cacao Linn.) cultivation in agroforestry systems of West and Central Africa: challenges and opportunities. Agroforest Syst 51:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forest Inventory Project (FIP) (1989) General yield tables for Ghana. In: Seminar proceedings pp 50–52, 29–30 March 1989 Accra

  • Forest Service Division (FSD) (2004) Stumpage prices for commercial timber species in Ghana. FSD, Kumasi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Investment Promotion Centre (GIPC) (2002) Ghana investment profile: food production and processing. GIPC. Accra, Ghana

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittinger JP (1982) Economic analysis of agricultural projects. World Bank, 505 pp

  • ICCO (2004) International cocoa organisation’s quarterly bulletin of cocoa statistics, London

  • Makonda, FB (2003) Gum arabic studies in Tanzania: production, utilisation and economic potentials. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Bangor, UK, 326 pp

  • McDonald MA, Obiri BD, Jatango JA, Anglaaere LCN, Cobbina J, Moss C, Nolte C, Weise SF, Gockowski J, Sinclair FL, Bright G, and Young, EM (2003) Shortened bush-fallow rotations for sustainable rural livelihoods in Ghana. (DFID Project R7446) Final Technical Report. 25 pp + appendices

  • Obiri BD, Ayisi-Jatango J, Anglaaere LCN, Cobbina J, Moss M, McDonald M, Sinclair F, Young E (2000) Livelihood systems and farmers’ ecological knowledge in Ghana: a report on three districts. Shortened bush fallow rotations for sustainable livelihoods in Ghana. DFID Project R7446. School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, UK, 146 pp

  • Obiri BD (2004) Improving fallow productivity in the forest and forest-savannah transition of Ghana: a socio-economic analysis of livelihoods and technologies. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Wales, Bangor, UK, 358 pp

  • Oladokun MAO, Egbe NE (1999) Yields of cacao/kola intercrops in Nigeria. Agroforest Syst 10:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osei-Bonsu K, Opoku Ameyaw K, Amoah FM, Oppong FK (2002) Cocoa-coconut intercropping in Ghana: agronomic and economic perspectives. Agroforest Syst 55:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesticide Action Network (PAN) UK, (2001) Sustainable cocoa production systems. A briefing for IPM in developing countries project of the european commission. PMN No. 12. London, UK

  • Price C (1989) The theory and application of forest economics. Blackwell

  • Rice RA, Greenberg R (2000) Cacao cultivation and the conservation of biological diversity. Ambio 29:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards M, Asare A (1998) Incentives for Ghanaian cocoa farmers to keep timber trees. Policy Briefing Note. DFID/FRP R6914

  • Ruf F, Zadi H (1998) Cocoa: from deforestation to reforestation. In first international workshop on sustainable cocoa growing, 1998, Smithsonian Institute, Panama

  • Ruf F, Schroth G (2004) Chocolate forests and monocultures: a historical review of cocoa growing and its conflicting role in tropical deforestation and forest conservation. In: Schroth G, da Fonseca AB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos HL, Izac A-MN (eds) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 107–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan D, Bright GA, Somarriba E (2007) Damage and yield change in cocoa crops due to harvesting of timber shade trees in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Agroforestry Systems (in press)

  • Yates C, Dorward P, Hemery G, Cook P (2007) The economic viability and potential of a novel poultry agroforestry system. Agroforest Syst 69:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is an output from research projects funded by the Biscuit, Cake, Chocolate and Confectionery Association of the United Kingdom (UK) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) [R7446 NRSP Research Programme]. The views expressed are not necessarily those of either organisation. The participation of the farmers’ of Gogoikrom is greatly appreciated. Finally, the authors would like to express their gratitude to the editor and two anonymous referees for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff A. Bright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Obiri, B.D., Bright, G.A., McDonald, M.A. et al. Financial analysis of shaded cocoa in Ghana. Agroforest Syst 71, 139–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9058-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9058-5

Keywords

Navigation