Abstract
Process intensification aims at reducing the size of equipment by orders of magnitude and is actively perused in separation processes. Its feasibility in Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) processes has been explored. A 4-bed PSA and a 3-bed PSA, which emulate the moving bed processes, and duplex PSA and a modified duplex PSA have been selected for the exploratory studies. Simulation studies on the separation of a mixture of CH4–CO2 over 5A zeolite were carried out to compare the performance of these processes. An index has been proposed to quantify the process intensification. The 3-bed PSA and the modified duplex PSA exhibited superior performance compared to the other two for a purity of 99.9 mol% of both the products. However, the performances of the processes other than duplex were comparable when purities were set at 95 mol%. In 3-bed PSA a modest process intensification of four times reduction in size and two times reduction in energy requirement appears to be feasible if benchmarked against the PSA based on the variant of the Skarstrom cycle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- b :
-
Langmuir parameter (m3/mol)
- c :
-
Concentration in gas phase (mol/m3)
- C A :
-
Cost of adsorbent (thousand US $/kg of adsorbent)
- C AA :
-
Annual cost of adsorbent (thousand US $/y⋅(mol/s))
- C AC :
-
Annual capital cost of adsorber (thousand US $/y⋅(mol/s))
- C AE :
-
Annual cost of energy (thousand US $/y⋅(mol/s))
- C AR :
-
Annual running cost (thousand US $/y⋅(mol/s))
- C E :
-
Energy cost (thousand US $/kWh)
- C LO :
-
Cost of component loss (thousand US $/y⋅(mol/s))
- d p :
-
Particle diameter (mm)
- D :
-
Diameter of bed (mm)
- D L0 :
-
Dispersion coefficient (m2/s)
- D M :
-
Molecular diffusivity (m2/s)
- E :
-
Energy (kJ/mol⋅feed)
- f :
-
Friction factor
- g c :
-
Gravitational constant (m/s2)
- \(I_{PI} , I_{PI}'\) :
-
Index for process intensification (thousand US $/y⋅(mol/s))
- k i :
-
Linear driving force constant (s−1)
- L :
-
Bed length (m)
- L e :
-
Equivalent length of the valve (m)
- n :
-
Number of moles
- N :
-
Number of components
- P :
-
Pressure (bar)
- \(\mathcal{P}\) :
-
Productivity of CH4 (LSTP/h⋅kg of adsorbent)
- P H :
-
Adsorption pressure (bar)
- P I :
-
Intermediate desorption pressure (bar)
- P L :
-
Desorption pressure (bar)
- P1, P2:
-
Pressures used in (9) (bar)
- q :
-
Amount adsorbed in solid phase (mol/m3)
- q e :
-
Amount adsorbed in solid phase at equilibrium with gas phase (mol/m3)
- q s :
-
Saturation constant (mol/m3)
- Q T :
-
Total amount adsorbed in solid phase (mol/m3)
- R :
-
Universal Gas constant (bar⋅m3/mol⋅K)
- R E , R R :
-
Extract, Raffinate reflux ratio
- T :
-
Operating temperature (K)
- t :
-
Time (s)
- t f :
-
Feed step time (s)
- t Ib :
-
Intermediate blowdown time (s)
- t fb :
-
Final blowdown time (s)
- v f :
-
Superficial velocity (m/s)
- x :
-
Mole fraction in gas phase
- x f :
-
Mole fraction of CO2 in feed
- X :
-
Mole fraction of CO2 in gas phase
- Y :
-
Mole fraction of CO2 in solid phase
- z :
-
Axial position in a adsorption bed (m)
- ε B :
-
Bed voidage
- μ :
-
Viscosity of gas (kg/m⋅s)
- γ :
-
Atomicity of gas
- ρ b :
-
Bulk density of bed (kg/m3)
- ρ g :
-
Density of gas (kg/m3)
- i :
-
Component i
References
Babicki, M., Hall, A.: PSA Technology hits the fast lane. http://www.xebecinc.com/pdf/e_h2x_fast_lane.pdf (2003). Accessed 23 April 2010
Cavenati, S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Layered pressure swing adsorption for methane recovery from CH4/CO2/N2 streams. Adsorption 11, 549–554 (2005a)
Cavenati, S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Upgrade of methane from landfill gas by pressure swing adsorption. Energy Fuels 19, 2545–2555 (2005b)
Cavenati, S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Removal of carbon dioxide from natural gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption. Energy Fuels 20, 2648–2659 (2006a)
Cavenati, S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Separation of CH4/CO2/N2 mixtures by layered pressure swing adsorption for upgrade of natural gas. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 3893–3906 (2006b)
Chen, Y.D., Ritter, J.A., Yang, R.T.: Nonideal Adsorption from multicomponent gas mixtures at elevated pressures on a 5A molecular sieve. Chem. Eng. Sci. 45, 2877–2897 (1990)
Delgado, J.A., Uguina, M.A., Sotelo, J.L., Ruiz, B., Gomes, J.M.: Fixed bed adsorption of carbon dioxide/methane mixtures on silicalite pellets. Adsorption 12, 5–18 (2006)
Delgado, J.A., Uguina, M.A., Sotelo, J.L., Ruiz, B., Rosario, M.: Carbon dioxide/methane separation by adsorption on sepiolite. J. Nat. Gas. Chem. 16, 235–243 (2007)
Ebner, A.D., Ritter, J.A.: Equilibrium theory analysis of dual reflux PSA for separation of a binary mixture. AIChE J. 50, 2418–2428 (2004)
Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Layered vacuum pressure-swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 7844–7848 (2007)
Hirose, T.: A simple design method of a new PSA process consisting of both rectifying and stripping sections. In: Proceedings of the 2nd China-Japan-USA Symposium on Adsorption, p. 123 (1991)
Huang, W.C., Chou, C.T.: A moving-finite element simulation of a pressure swing adsorption process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21, 301–315 (1997)
Issac, A., Thakur, R.S., Verma, N., Kaistha, N., Rao, D.P.: Process intensification in 4-bed PSA. In: 2nd International Congress on Green Process Engineering, 14–17 June, Venice, Italy (2009)
Jayaraman, A., Chiao, A.S., Padin, J., Yang, R.T., Munson, C.L.: Kinetic separation of methane/carbon dioxide by molecular sieve carbons. Sep. Sci. Technol. 37, 2505–2528 (2002)
Kapoor, A., Yang, R.T.: Kinetic separation of methane- carbon dioxide mixture by adsorption on molecular sieve carbon. Chem. Eng. Sci. 44, 1723–1733 (1989)
Kearns, D.T., Webley, P.A.: Modelling and evaluation of dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption cycles: Part I. Mathematical models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 7223–7233 (2006)
Kim, M.B., Bae, Y.S., Choi, D.K., Lee, C.H.: Kinetic separation of landfill gas by a two bed pressure swing adsorption process packed with carbon molecular sieve: nonisothermal operation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 5050–5058 (2006)
Kulprathipanja, S.: Reactive Separation Process. Taylor & Francis, New York (2002)
Kumar, P., Sivakumar, S.V., Rao, D.P.: New Duplex adsorption process for fraction of gas mixture. Indian Patent Application 1567/DEL/2006 (2006)
Leavitt, F.W.: Duplex adsorption process, US Patent 5,085,674 (1992)
Park, J.H., Kim, J.N., Cho, S.H.: Performance analysis of four-bed H2 PSA process using layered beds. AIChE J. 46, 790–802 (2000)
Rao, D.P., Bhowal, A., Goswami, P.S.: Process intensification in rotating packed beds (HIGEE): An appraisal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 1150–1162 (2004)
Rao, D.P., Sivakumar, S.V., Mandal, S., Kota, S., Ramprasad, B.S.G.: Novel simulated moving-bed adsorber for the fractionation of gas mixtures. J. Chromatogr. A 1069, 141–151 (2005)
Reay, D., Ramshaw, C., Harvey, A.: Process Intensification: Engineering for Efficiency, Sustainability and Flexibility. Butterworth-Heinemann, UK (2008)
Rota, R., Wankat, P.C.: Intensification of pressure swing adsorption processes. AIChE J. 36, 1299–1311 (1990)
Sircar, S.: Separation of methane and carbon dioxide gas mixtures by pressure swing adsorption. Sep. Sci. Technol. 23, 519–529 (1988)
Sircar, S., Kumar, R., Koch, W.R., VanSloun, J.: Recovery of methane from landfill gas. US Patent 4,770,676 (1988)
Sivakumar, S.V.: Sharp separation and process intensification in adsorptive separation processes. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Chemical Eng. Indian Institute of Tech., Kanpur, India (2007)
Stankiewicz, A.I., Moulijn, J.A.: Process Intensification: Transforming chemical engineering. Chem. Eng. Progress, 22–34 (2000)
Stankiewicz, A., Moulijn, J.A.: Process intensification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 1920–1924 (2002)
Treybal, R.E.: Mass Transfer Operations. Chemical Engineering Series. McGraw-Hill, Singapore (1981)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spoorthi, G., Thakur, R.S., Kaistha, N. et al. Process intensification in PSA processes for upgrading synthetic landfill and lean natural gases. Adsorption 17, 121–133 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-010-9302-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-010-9302-6