Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental, Theoretical and Numerical Investigation of the Flexural Behaviour of the Composite Sandwich Panels with PVC Foam Core

  • Published:
Applied Composite Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents the main results of an experimental, theoretical and numerical investigation on the flexural behaviour and failure mode of composite sandwich panels primarily developed for marine applications. The face sheets of the sandwich panels are made up of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP), while polyvinylchloride (PVC) foam was used as core material. Four-point bending test was carried out to investigate the flexural behaviour of the sandwich panel under quasi static load. The finite element (FE) analysis taking into account the cohesive nature of the skin-core interaction as well as the geometry and materials nonlinearity was performed, while a classical beam theory was used to estimate the flexural response. Although the FE results accurately represented the initial and post yield flexural response, the theoretical one restricted to the initial response of the sandwich panel due to the linearity assumptions. Core shear failure associate with skin-core debonding close to the loading points was the dominant failure mode observed experimentally and validated numerically and theoretically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zenkert, D., Schubert, O., Burman, M.: Fracture initiation in foam–core sandwich structures due to singular stresses at corners of flawed butt joints. Mech. Compos. Mater. Struct. 4(1), 1–21 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuenzi, E.W: Minimum weight structural sandwich. US Forest Service research note FPL-086 (1965)

  3. Mouritz, A.P., Gellert, E., Burchill, P., Challis, K.: Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines. Compos. Struct 53, 21–41 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, C.S.: Design of marine structures in composite materials. Elsevier Applied Science, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hull, D., Clyne, T.W.: An introduction to composite materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Belouettar, S., Abbadi, A., Azari, Z., Belouettar, R., Freres, P.: Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composite honeycomb materials using four point bending tests. Compos. Struct 87(3), 265–273 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel, I.M., Abot, J.L.: Fabrication, testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams. Compos. Sci. Technol 60, 2455–2463 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai, J., Thomas Hahn, H.: Flexural behaviour of sandwich beams fabricated by vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding. Compos. Struct 61, 247–253 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mouritz, A.P., Thomson, R.S.: Compression, flexure and shear properties of a sandwich composite containing defects. Compos. Struct 44, 263–278 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jen, Y.M., Chang, L.Y.: Evaluating bending fatigue strength of aluminium honeycomb sandwich beams using local parameters. Int. J. Fatigue 30, 1103–1114 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reis, E.M., Rizkalla, S.H.: Material characteristics of 3-D FRP sandwich panels. Constr. Build. Mater. 22, 1009–1018 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen, H.G.: Analysis and design of structural sandwich plates. Franklin Book Co (1969)

  13. Ojalvo, I.V.: Departures from elastic beam theory in laminated sandwich and short beams. AIAA J 5(10), 1518–1521 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, J., Swanson, S.R.: Design of sandwich structures for concentrated loading. Compos. Struct 52, 365–373 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bezazi, A., Mah, A., Berthelot, J.M., Bezzazi, B.: Experimental analysis of behavior and damage of sandwich composite materials in three-point bending. Part 1. Static tests and stiffness degradation at failure studies. Strength Mater 39(2), 170–177 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Russo, A., Zuccarello, B.: Experimental and numerical evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of GFRP sandwich panels. Compos. Struct 81, 575–586 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM-D3039: ASTM Standard D3039/D3039M–08, Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International, Philadelphia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM-D3410: ASTM Standard D3410/D3410M–03, Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsupported gage section by shear loading. ASTM International, Philadelphia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM-D3518/D35: ASTM D 3518/D3518M–94, Standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a ±45° laminate. ASTM International, Philadelphia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM-C297: ASTM Standard C297/C297M–04, Standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions. ASTM International, Philadelphia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM-C365: ASTM Standard C365/C365M–05, Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores. ASTM International, Philadelphia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ASTM-C273: ASTM Standard C273/C273M–07, Standard test method for shear properties of sandwich core materials. ASTM International, Philadelphia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mostafa, A., Shankar, K., Morozov, E.V.: Insight into the shear behaviour of composite sandwich panels with foam core. Mater. Des. 50, 92–101 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ASTM-C393: ASTM Standard C393/C393M–06, Standard test method for core shear properties of sandwich constructions by beam flexure. ASTM International, Philadelphia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gibson, R.F.: Principles of composite materials mechanics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Florida (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Steeves, C.A., Fleck, N.A.: Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part II: experimental investigation and numerical modelling. Int. J. Mech. Sci 46, 585–608 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zenkert, D.: An introduction to sandwich constructions. EMAS, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bank, L.C.: Composites for construction: Structural design with FRP materials. New Jersy (2006)

  29. Barbero, E.J.: Introduction to composite materials design. New York (1999)

  30. DIAB: Sandwich Concept. DIAB Sandwich Handbook Available from: www.diabgroup.com (2012)

  31. Deshpande, V.S., Fleck, N.A.: Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. J. Mech. Phys. Solid 48, 1253–1283 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Systèmes, D.: ABAQUS Documentation. In. (2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales at The Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia

    A. Mostafa, K. Shankar & E. V. Morozov

Authors
  1. A. Mostafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Shankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. V. Morozov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mostafa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mostafa, A., Shankar, K. & Morozov, E.V. Experimental, Theoretical and Numerical Investigation of the Flexural Behaviour of the Composite Sandwich Panels with PVC Foam Core. Appl Compos Mater 21, 661–675 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-013-9361-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-013-9361-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation