Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of Composite Material System and Lay-up to Achieve Minimum Weight Pressure Vessel

  • Published:
Applied Composite Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of composite pressure vessels particularly in the aerospace industry is escalating rapidly because of their superiority in directional strength and colossal weight advantage. The present work elucidates the procedure to optimize the lay-up for composite pressure vessel using finite element analysis and calculate the relative weight saving compared with the reference metallic pressure vessel. The determination of proper fiber orientation and laminate thickness is very important to decrease manufacturing difficulties and increase structural efficiency. In the present work different lay-up sequences for laminates including, cross-ply [0 m /90 n ] s , angle-ply [±θ] ns , [90/±θ] ns and [0/±θ] ns , are analyzed. The lay-up sequence, orientation and laminate thickness (number of layers) are optimized for three candidate composite materials S-glass/epoxy, Kevlar/epoxy and Carbon/epoxy. Finite element analysis of composite pressure vessel is performed by using commercial finite element code ANSYS and utilizing the capabilities of ANSYS Parametric Design Language and Design Optimization module to automate the process of optimization. For verification, a code is developed in MATLAB based on classical lamination theory; incorporating Tsai–Wu failure criterion for first-ply failure (FPF). The results of the MATLAB code shows its effectiveness in theoretical prediction of first-ply failure strengths of laminated composite pressure vessels and close agreement with the FEA results. The optimization results shows that for all the composite material systems considered, the angle-ply [±θ] ns is the optimum lay-up. For given fixed ply thickness the total thickness of laminate is obtained resulting in factor of safety slightly higher than two. Both Carbon/epoxy and Kevlar/Epoxy resulted in approximately same laminate thickness and considerable percentage of weight saving, but S-glass/epoxy resulted in weight increment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krikanov, A.A.: Composite pressure vessels with higher stiffness. Compos. Struct. 48(1–3), 119–127 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fukunaga, H., Chou, T.W.: Simplified design techniques for laminated cylindricalpressure vessels under stiffness and strength constraints. J. Compos. Mater 22, 1156–1169 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grimes, G.C.: Composite Materials – Testing and design, vol. 10. ASTM Philadelphia, PA (1992). 0899–1308

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, R. M.: “Mechanics of Composite Materials (Materials science and engineering series)”, CRC Press; 2nd edition July, 1998, ISBN-10: 156032712X

  5. Lekhnitskii, S.G.: In: Fern, P. (ed.) Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic elastic body. Holden-Day, Inc, San Francisco (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lekhnitskii, S.G.: In: Tsai, S.W., Cheron, T. (eds.) Anisotropic plates. Gordon and Breach, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitinskii, A.N.: The stresses in a thick-walled anisotropic tube under the influence of internal and external pressures, In: Proceedings of Institute of Engineers and Railroad Transportation in Leningrad, 1947

  8. Belingardi, G., Genta, G., Gola, M.: Optimization of orthotropic multilayered cylinders androtating discs. AMR (J. Aerotecnica. Missili. E. Spazio.) 56(4), 204–209 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fukunaga, H., Chou, T.-W.: Simplified design techniques for laminated cylindrical pressurevesselsunder stiffness and strength constraints. J. Comp. Mater 22, 1156–1169 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park, J.H., Hwang J.H., Lee C.S., Hwang, W.: Stacking sequence design of composite laminates for maximum strength using genetic algorithms. Compos. Struct. 217–31 (2001)

  11. Tauchert, T.R.: Optimum design of a reinforced cylindrical pressure vessel. J. Comp. Mater 15, 390–402 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adali, S., Sumers, E.B., Verijenko, V.E.: Optimization of laminated cylindrical pressure vessels under strength criterion. Comp. Struct. 25, 305–312 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reddy, J.N., Pandey, A.K.: A first-ply failure analysis of composite laminates. Comput. Struct. 25(3), 371–393 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reddy, Y.S.N., Reddy, J.N.: Linear and non-linear failure analysis of composite laminates with transverse shear. Comput. Sci. Tech. 44, 227–255 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oguni, K., Ravichandran, G.: A micromechanical failure model for unidirectional fiber reinforced composites. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 7215–7233 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishai, O.: Microcomputer program for analysis of mechanical behavior of multimaterial composite laminates, LIN 925 PC version, technion. Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. C. Wooh and 1. M. Daniel, ICAN-Interactive Composite Analysis, Version 1.02, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, (1992)

  18. Barenberg, B.J.: “Effect of Interweaving on the axial compressive strength and Modulus of filament-wound composite cylinders, MIT, (1991)

  19. Daniel, I.M., Ishai, O.: Engineering mechanics of composite materials. University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haris, H.M., Rahman H.: “Influence of Mosaic Patterns on the Structural Integrity of Filament Wound Composite Pressure Vessels”, Intl J. of Structural Integrity, Vol.2 No3, p345-356.

  21. Mechanical APDL Advanced Analysis Techniques Guide – ANSYS Inc. November 2010. http://www1.ansys.com/customer/content/documentation/130/ans_adv.pdf

  22. Theory Reference for the Mechanical APDL and Mechanical – ANSYS Inc. November 2010.www1.ansys.com/customer/content/documentation/120/ans_thry.pdf

  23. Stephen, W. Tsai and H. Thomas Hahn. Introduction to Composite Materials, Section 7.2. Technomic Publishing Company. (1980)

  24. Evans, K.E., Zhang, W.C.: The Determination of the Normal Interactive Term in the Tsai- Wu Polynomial Strength Criterion. Compos. Sci. Technol. 30, 251–262 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ishai, O., Krishnamachari, S., Broutman, L.J.: Structural design optimization of composite laminates. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 7, 459–474 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support from Centre of Excellence in Science & Applied Technologies (CESAT), Pakistan is acknowledged. The first author was awarded Chinese Government Scholarship from China Scholarship Council (CSC) for his MS studies and is thankfully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haris Hameed Mian.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 6 Material and Strength Properties for unidirectional composite

Appendix B

Fig. 11
figure 11figure 11

Component Stress (Sx,Sy,Sxy) plot for optimized lay-ups

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mian, H.H., Wang, G., Dar, U.A. et al. Optimization of Composite Material System and Lay-up to Achieve Minimum Weight Pressure Vessel. Appl Compos Mater 20, 873–889 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-012-9305-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-012-9305-4

Keywords

Navigation