Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Compaction Behavior and Part Thickness Variation in Vacuum Infusion Molding Process

  • Published:
Applied Composite Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vacuum infusion molding process (VIMP), it is difficult to manufacture a composite part with small dimensional tolerance, since the upper mold for the process is flexible. In this study, the static and cyclic compaction responses of five kinds of fabrics were experimentally studied under real VIMP conditions, with the effects of compaction pressure, compaction time, compaction cycle and number of the fabric layers. The static and cyclic compaction responses of the all fabrics follow different power law models and the resulting fiber volume fraction and relaxation factor increase with the number of layers. Although the resulting fiber volume fraction increases with the layer numbers, change of the fiber volume fraction of the composite parts with 10 layers to 100 layers of the all fabrics is less than 2.5%. The thickness of the composite part was monitored and measured using micrometer gauges, and the effects of processing parameters on the final thickness of part was investigated. The part thickness varies as a function of spatial coordinates and time during pre-filling, filling and post-filling stages in VIMP. The variation and the final value of the part thickness would be significantly affected by the processing parameters. Statistical results show that the final part thickness is equivalent to the thickness of the dry preform under the 0.08 MPa vacuum compaction pressure in VIMP. The difference between the fiber volume fraction of the final part and that of the dry preform is 2% ~ 5.7%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayldon, J.M., Daniel, I.M.: Flow modeling of the VARTM process including progressive satuation effects. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufact. 40, 1044–1052 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yuexin, D., Zhaoyuan, T., Yan, Z., Jing, S.: Compression responses of preform in vacuum infusion process. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 21, 370–377 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Govignon, Q., Bickerton, S., Kelly, P.A.: Simulation of the reinforcement compaction and resin flow during the complete resin infusion process. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufact. 41, 45–57 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Simacek, P., Heider, D., Gillespie Jr., J.W., Advani, S.: Post-filling flow in vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process: Theoretical analysis. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufact. 40, 913–924 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yenilmez, B., Senan, M., Sozer, E.M.: Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 1710–1719 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly, P.A., Umerb, R., Bickerton, S.: Viscoelastic response of dry and wet fibrous materials during infusion processes. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 27, 868–873 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammami, A.: Effect of reinforcement structure on compaction behavior in the vacuum infusion process. Polym. Compos. 22, 337–348 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo, Y., Verposet, I.: Compressibility and relaxation of a new sandwich textile preform for liquid composite molding. Polym. Compos. 20, 179–191 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robitaille, F., Gauvin, R.: Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing: I-review of experimental results. Polym. Compos. 19, 543–600 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tackitt, K.D., Walsh, S.M.: Experimental study of thickness gradient formation in the VI process. Mater. Manuf. Process. 20, 607–627 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Correia, N.C., Robitaille, F., Long, A.C., Rudd, C.D., Simacek, P., Advani, S.G.: Analysis of the vacuum infusion molding process: I. Analytical formulation. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufact. 26, 1645–1656 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robitaille, F., Gauvin, R.: Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. II: Compaction and relaxation of dry and H2O-saturated woven reinforcements. Polym. Compos. 19, 543–557 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kruckenberg, T., Ye, L., Paton, R.: Static and vibration compaction and microstructure analysis on plain-woven textile fabrics. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufact. 39, 488–502 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is fund by the national “863” plan project of China (2007AA03Z563) and the science & technology project of Hunan Province (2009FJ1002). The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Cooperative Zhuzhou Times New Material Technology Co., Ltd for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jinshui Yang or Jiayu Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, J., Xiao, J., Zeng, J. et al. Compaction Behavior and Part Thickness Variation in Vacuum Infusion Molding Process. Appl Compos Mater 19, 443–458 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-011-9217-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-011-9217-8

Keywords

Navigation