Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-dimensional Quantification of Femoral Head Shape in Controls and Patients with Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An objective measurement technique to quantify 3D femoral head shape was developed and applied to normal subjects and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). 3D reconstructions were made from high-resolution CT images of 15 cam and 15 control femurs. Femoral heads were fit to ideal geometries consisting of rotational conchoids and spheres. Geometric similarity between native femoral heads and ideal shapes was quantified. The maximum distance native femoral heads protruded above ideal shapes and the protrusion area were measured. Conchoids provided a significantly better fit to native femoral head geometry than spheres for both groups. Cam-type FAI femurs had significantly greater maximum deviations (4.99 ± 0.39 mm and 4.08 ± 0.37 mm) than controls (2.41 ± 0.31 mm and 1.75 ± 0.30 mm) when fit to spheres or conchoids, respectively. The area of native femoral heads protruding above ideal shapes was significantly larger in controls when a lower threshold of 0.1 mm (for spheres) and 0.01 mm (for conchoids) was used to define a protrusion. The 3D measurement technique described herein could supplement measurements of radiographs in the diagnosis of cam-type FAI. Deviations up to 2.5 mm from ideal shapes can be expected in normal femurs while deviations of 4–5 mm are characteristic of cam-type FAI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almoussa, S., C. Barton, A. D. Speirs, W. Gofton, and P. E. Beaule. Computer-assisted correction of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement: a sawbones study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 93(Suppl 2):70–75, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anda, S., T. Terjesen, K. A. Kvistad, and S. Svenningsen. Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: Ct investigation. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 15:115–120, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, A. E., B. J. Ellis, S. A. Maas, and J. A. Weiss. Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip. J. Biomech. 43:1351–1357, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, A. E., B. J. Ellis, C. L. Peters, and J. A. Weiss. Cartilage thickness: factors influencing multidetector ct measurements in a phantom study. Radiology 246:133–141, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, A. E., C. L. Peters, B. D. Tuttle, and J. A. Weiss. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. J. Biomech. Eng. 127:364–373, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Audenaert, E. A., N. Baelde, W. Huysse, L. Vigneron, and C. Pattyn. Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement. Skeletal Radiol. 40:921–927, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Audenaert, E. A., I. Peeters, S. Van Onsem, and C. Pattyn. Can we predict the natural course of femoroacetabular impingement? Acta Orthop. Belg. 77:188–196, 2011.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barton, C., M. J. Salineros, K. S. Rakhra, and P. E. Beaule. Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 469:464–469, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beaule, P. E., E. Zaragoza, K. Motamedi, N. Copelan, and F. J. Dorey. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J. Orthop. Res. 23:1286–1292, 2005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Byrd, J. W., and K. S. Jones. Arthroscopic femoroplasty in the management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467:739–746, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carlisle, J. C., L. P. Zebala, D. S. Shia, D. Hunt, P. M. Morgan, H. Prather, R. W. Wright, K. Steger-May, and J. C. Clohisy. Reliability of various observers in determining common radiographic parameters of adult hip structural anatomy. Iowa Orthop. J. 31:52–58, 2011.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cerveri, P., A. Manzotti, and G. Baroni. Patient-specific acetabular shape modelling: comparison among sphere, ellipsoid and conchoid parameterisations. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2012. doi:10.1080/10255842.2012.702765

  13. Clohisy, J. C., J. C. Carlisle, R. Trousdale, Y. J. Kim, P. E. Beaule, P. Morgan, K. Steger-May, P. L. Schoenecker, and M. Millis. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467:666–675, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clohisy, J. C., J. C. Carlisle, P. E. Beaule, Y. J. Kim, R. T. Trousdale, R. J. Sierra, M. Leunig, P. L. Schoenecker, and M. B. Millis. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90(Suppl 4):47–66, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clohisy, J. C., L. P. Zebala, J. J. Nepple, and G. Pashos. Combined hip arthroscopy and limited open osteochondroplasty for anterior femoroacetabular impingement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 92:1697–1706, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clohisy, J. C., R. M. Nunley, R. J. Otto, and P. L. Schoenecker. The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 462:115–121, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Domayer, S. E., K. Ziebarth, J. Chan, S. Bixby, T. C. Mamisch, and Y. J. Kim. Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. Eur. J. Radiol. 80(3):805–810, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dudda, M., C. Albers, T. C. Mamisch, S. Werlen, and M. Beck. Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467:651–659, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eijer, H., M. Leunig, N. Mahomed, and R. Ganz. Cross table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int. 11:37–41, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ganz, R., J. Parvizi, M. Beck, M. Leunig, H. Notzli, and K. A. Siebenrock. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 417:112–120, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganz, R., T. J. Gill, E. Gautier, K. Ganz, N. Krugel, and U. Berlemann. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 83(8):1119–1124, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harris, W. H. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 213:20–33, 1986.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ito, K., M. A. Minka, 2nd, M. Leunig, S. Werlen, and R. Ganz. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 83:171–176, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kapron, A. L., A. E. Anderson, S. K. Aoki, L. G. Phillips, D. J. Petron, R. Toth, and C. L. Peters. Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players: Aaos exhibit selection. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 93:e111(111-110), 2011.

  25. Konan, S., F. Rayan, and F. S. Haddad. Is the frog lateral plain radiograph a reliable predictor of the alpha angle in femoroacetabular impingement? J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 92:47–50, 2010.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lavigne, M., J. Parvizi, M. Beck, K. A. Siebenrock, R. Ganz, and M. Leunig. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part i. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 418:61–66, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lavigne, M., M. Kalhor, M. Beck, R. Ganz, and M. Leunig. Distribution of vascular foramina around the femoral head and neck junction: relevance for conservative intracapsular procedures of the hip. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 36(2):171–176, viii, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mardones, R. M., C. Gonzalez, Q. Chen, M. Zobitz, K. R. Kaufman, and R. T. Trousdale. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. Surgical technique. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88(Suppl 1 Pt 1):84–91, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Matsuda, D. K. The case for cam surveillance: the arthroscopic detection of cam femoroacetabular impingement missed on preoperative imaging and its significance. Arthroscopy 27:870–876, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meermans, G., S. Konan, F. S. Haddad, and J. D. Witt. Prevalence of acetabular cartilage lesions and labral tears in femoroacetabular impingement. Acta Orthop. Belg. 76:181–188, 2010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Menschik, F. The hip joint as a conchoid shape. J. Biomech. 30:971–973, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Metz, C. T. Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs. Utrecht: Utrecht University, p. 79, 2005.

  33. Meyer, D. C., M. Beck, T. Ellis, R. Ganz, and M. Leunig. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 445:181–185, 2006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nepple, J. J., J. C. Carlisle, R. M. Nunley, and J. C. Clohisy. Clinical and radiographic predictors of intra-articular hip disease in arthroscopy. Am. J. Sports Med. 39:296–303, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Notzli, H. P., T. F. Wyss, C. H. Stoecklin, M. R. Schmid, K. Treiber, and J. Hodler. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 84:556–560, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pfirrmann, C. W., B. Mengiardi, C. Dora, F. Kalberer, M. Zanetti, and J. Hodler. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic mr arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 240:778–785, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Philippon, M. J., R. B. Maxwell, T. L. Johnston, M. Schenker, and K. K. Briggs. Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 15:1041–1047, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Philippon, M. J., M. L. Schenker, K. K. Briggs, D. A. Kuppersmith, R. B. Maxwell, and A. J. Stubbs. Revision hip arthroscopy. Am. J. Sports Med. 35:1918–1921, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pollard, T. C., R. N. Villar, M. R. Norton, E. D. Fern, M. R. Williams, D. J. Simpson, D. W. Murray, and A. J. Carr. Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta orthopaedica. 81:134–141, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rakhra, K. S., A. M. Sheikh, D. Allen, and P. E. Beaule. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467:660–665, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rasquinha, B. J., J. Sayani, J. F. Rudan, G. C. Wood, and R. E. Ellis. Articular surface remodeling of the hip after periacetabular osteotomy. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 7:241–248, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ruff, C. B., and W. C. Hayes. Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia. J. Orthop. Res. 6:886–896, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Siebenrock, K. A., K. H. Wahab, S. Werlen, M. Kalhor, M. Leunig, and R. Ganz. Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 418:54–60, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tannast, M., D. Goricki, M. Beck, S. B. Murphy, and K. A. Siebenrock. Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 466:273–280, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tannast, M., M. Kubiak-Langer, F. Langlotz, M. Puls, S. B. Murphy, and K. A. Siebenrock. Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J. Orthop. Res. 25:122–131, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tannast, M., K. A. Siebenrock, and S. E. Anderson. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis–what the radiologist should know. Radiologia 50:271–284, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for the recruitment and CT scanning of cam-type FAI patients was received through NIH grant #R01AR053344. Procurement and CT scanning of the control femurs was done with funds from a U.S. Department of the Army Award #W81XWH-06-1-0574.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew E. Anderson.

Additional information

Associate Editor Michael R. Torry oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, M.D., Reese, S.P., Peters, C.L. et al. Three-dimensional Quantification of Femoral Head Shape in Controls and Patients with Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 1162–1171 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0762-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0762-1

Keywords

Navigation