Abstract
The slope of the diastatic pressure–volume relationship (D-PVR) defines passive left ventricular (LV) stiffness \( \mathcal{K}.\) Although \( \mathcal{K} \) is a relative measure, cardiac catheterization, which is an absolute measurement method, is used to obtain the former. Echocardiography, including transmitral flow velocity (Doppler E-wave) analysis, is the preferred quantitative diastolic function (DF) assessment method. However, E-wave analysis can provide only relative, rather than absolute pressure information. We hypothesized that physiologic mechanism-based modeling of E-waves allows derivation of the D-PVRE-wave whose slope, \( \mathcal{K}_{{\text{E-}}{\text{wave}}} \), provides E-wave-derived diastatic, passive chamber stiffness. Our kinematic model of filling and Bernoulli’s equation were used to derive expressions for diastatic pressure and volume on a beat-by-beat basis, thereby generating D-PVRE-wave, and \( \mathcal{K}_{{\text{E-}}{\text{wave}}} \). For validation, simultaneous (conductance catheter) P–V and echocardiographic E-wave data from 30 subjects (444 total cardiac cycles) having normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were analyzed. For each subject (15 beats average) model-predicted \( \mathcal{K}_{{\text{E-}}{\text{wave}}} \) was compared to experimentally measured \( \mathcal{K}_{\text{CATH}} \) via linear regression yielding as follows: \( \mathcal{K}_{{\text{E-}}{\text{wave}}} = \alpha {\mathcal{K}}_{\text{CATH}} + b\;(R^{2} = 0.92), \) where, α = 0.995 and b = 0.02. We conclude that echocardiographically determined diastatic passive chamber stiffness, \( \mathcal{K}_{{\text{E-}}{\text{wave}}} \), provides an excellent estimate of simultaneous, gold standard (P–V)-defined diastatic stiffness, \( \mathcal{K}_{\text{CATH}} \). Hence, in chambers at diastasis, passive LV stiffness can be accurately determined by means of suitable analysis of Doppler E-waves (transmitral flow).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appleton, C. P., L. K. Hatle, and R. L. Popp. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 12:426–440, 1988.
Bauman, L., C. S. Chung, M. Karamanoglu, and S. J. Kovács. The peak atrioventricular pressure gradient to transmitral flow relation: kinematic model prediction with in vivo validation. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 17:839–844, 2004.
Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310, 1986.
Chung, C. S., D. M. Ajo, and S. J. Kovács. Isovolumic pressure-to-early rapid filling decay rate relation: model-based derivation and validation via simultaneous catheterization echocardiography. J. Appl. Physiol. 100:528–534, 2006.
Chung, C. S., M. Karamanoglu, and S. J. Kovács. Duration of diastole and its phases as a function of heart rate during supine bicycle exercise. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 287:H2003–H2008, 2004.
Chung, C. S., and S. J. Kovács. Physical determination of left ventricular isovolumic pressure decline: model prediction with in vivo validation. Am. J. Physiol. 294:H1589–H1596, 2008.
Chung, C. S., A. Strunc, R. Oliver, and S. J. Kovács. Diastolic ventricular-vascular stiffness and relaxation relation: elucidation of coupling via pressure phase plane-derived indexes. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 291:H2415–H2423, 2006.
Courtois, M., S. J. Kovács, and P. A. Ludbrook. Transmitral pressure-flow velocity relation. Importance of regional pressure gradients in the left ventricle during diastole. Circulation 78:661–671, 1988.
Dent, C. L., A. W. Bowman, M. J. Scott, J. S. Allen, J. B. Lisauskas, M. Janif, S. A. Wickline, and S. J. Kovács. Echocardiographic characterization of fundamental mechanisms of abnormal diastolic filling in diabetic rats with a parametrized diastolic filling formalism. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 14:1166–1172, 2001.
Dumont, C. A., L. Monserrat, J. Peteiro, R. Soler, E. Rodriguez, A. Bouzas, X. Fernández, R. Pérez, B. Bouzas, and A. Castro-Beiras. Relation of left ventricular chamber stiffness at rest to exercise capacity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 99:1454–1457, 2007.
Falsetti, H. L., M. S. Verani, C. J. Chen, and J. A. Cramer. Regional pressure differences in the left ventricle. Catheter Cardiovasc. Diag. 6:123–134, 1980.
Firstenberg, M. S., P. M. Vandervoort, N. L. Greenberg, N. G. Smedira, P. M. McCarthy, M. J. Garcia, and J. D. Thomas. Noninvasive estimation of transmitral pressure drop across the normal mitral valve in humans: importance of convective and inertial forces during left ventricular filling. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 36:1942–1949, 2000.
Garcia, M. J., J. D. Thomas, and A. L. Klein. New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic dysfunction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 32:865–875, 1998.
Hall, A. F., and S. J. Kovács. Processing parameter effects on the robustness of the solution to the “Inverse Problem” of diastole from Doppler echocardiographic data. In: 15th Annual International Conference, IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, 1993, pp. I385–I387.
Hall, A. F., and S. J. Kovács. Automated method for characterization of diastolic transmitral Doppler velocity contours: early rapid filling. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 20:107–116, 1994.
Haney, S., D. Sur, and Z. Xu. Diastolic heart failure: a review and primary care perspective. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 18:189–198, 2005.
Kass, D. A. Assessment of diastolic dysfunction: invasive modalities. Cardiol. Clin. 18:571–586, 2000.
Kass, D. A., J. G. F. Bronzwaer, and W. J. Paulus. What mechanism underline diastolic dysfunction in heart failure? Circ. Res. 94:1533–1542, 2004.
Khouri, S. J., G. T. Maly, D. D. Suh, and T. E. Walsh. A practical approach to the echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 17:290–297, 2004.
Kovács, S. J., B. Barzilai, and J. E. Pérez. Evaluation of diastolic function with Doppler echocardiography: the PDF formalism. Am. J. Physiol. 87:H178–H187, 1987.
Kovács, S. J., M. D. McQueen, and C. S. Peskin. Modelling cardiac fluid dynamics and diastolic function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 359:1299–1314, 2001.
Kovács, S. J., J. S. Meisner, and E. L. Yellin. Modeling of diastole. Cardiol. Clin. 18:459–487, 2000.
Kovács, S. J., R. Sester, and A. F. Hall. Left ventricular chamber stiffness from model-based image processing of transmitral Doppler E-waves. Coron. Artery Dis. 8:179–187, 1997.
Lisauskas, J. B., J. Singh, A. W. Bowman, and S. J. Kovács. Chamber properties from transmitral flow: prediction of average and passive left ventricular diastolic stiffness. J. Appl. Physiol. 91:154–162, 2001.
Lisauskas, J. B., J. Singh, M. Courtois, and S. J. Kovács. The relation of the peak Doppler E-wave to peak mitral annulus velocity ratio to diastolic function. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27:499–507, 2001.
Little, W. C., M. Ohno, D. W. Kitzman, J. D. Thomas, and C. P. Cheng. Determination of left ventricular chamber stiffness from the time for deceleration of early left ventricular filling. Circulation 92:1933–1939, 1995.
Maeder, M. T., and D. M. Kaye. Heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53:905–918, 2009.
Mossahebi, S., L. Shmuylovich, and S. J. Kovács. The thermodynamics of diastole: kinematic modeling based derivation of the P–V loop to transmitral flow energy relation, with in-vivo validation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 300:H514–H521, 2011.
Nagueh, S. F., C. P. Appleton, T. C. Gillebert, P. N. Marino, J. K. Oh, O. A. Smiseth, A. D. Waggoner, F. A. Flachskampf, P. A. Pellikka, and A. Evangelista. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 22(2):107–133, 2009.
Nishimura, R. A., and A. J. Tajik. Evaluation of diastolic filling of left ventricle in health and disease: Doppler echocardiography is the clinician’s Rosetta Stone. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 30:8–18, 1997.
Oki, T., T. Tabata, Y. Mishiro, H. Yamada, M. Abe, Y. Onose, T. Wakatsuki, A. Iuchi, and S. Ito. Pulsed tissue Doppler imaging of left ventricular systolic and diastolic wall motion velocities to evaluate differences between long and short axes in healthy subjects. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 12:308–313, 1999.
Omens, J., and Y. Fung. Residual strain in rat left ventricle. Circ. Res. 66:37–45, 1990.
Riordan, M. M., C. S. Chung, and S. J. Kovács. Diabetes and diastolic function: stiffness and relaxation from transmitral flow. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31:1589–1596, 2005.
Shmuylovich, L., and S. J. Kovács. E-wave deceleration time may not provide accurate determination of left ventricular chamber stiffness if left ventricular relaxation/viscoelasticity is unknown. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 292:H2712–H2720, 2007.
Støylen, A., S. Slordahl, G. K. Skjelvan, A. Heimdal, and T. Skjaerpe. Strain rate imaging in normal and reduced diastolic function: comparison with pulsed Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 14:264–274, 2001.
Suga, H., K. Sagawa, and A. A. Shoukas. Load independence of the instantaneous pressure–volume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ. Res. 32:314–322, 1973.
Thomas, J. D., J. B. Newell, C. Y. Choong, and A. E. Weyman. Physical and physiological determinants of transmitral velocity: numerical analysis. Am. J. Physiol. 260:H1718–H1731, 1991.
Yellin, E. L. Mitral valve motion, intracardiac dynamics and flow pattern modelling: physiology and pathophysiology. In: Advances in Cardiovascular Physics, edited by D. N. Ghista. Basel: Karger, 1983, pp. 137–161.
Zhang, W., C. S. Chung, L. Shmuylovich, and S. J. Kovács. Viewpoint: is left ventricular volume during diastasis the real equilibrium volume and, what is its relationship to diastolic suction? J. Appl. Physiol. 105:1012–1014, 2008.
Zhang, W., and S. J. Kovács. The diastatic pressure–volume relationship is not the same as the end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 294(6):H2750–H2760, 2008.
Zhang, W., L. Shmuylovich, and S. J. Kovács. The E-wave delayed relaxation pattern to LV pressure contour relation: model-based prediction with in-vivo validation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36:497–511, 2010.
Zile, M. R., and D. L. Brutsaert. New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: part I. Circulation. 105:1387–1393, 2002.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by the Alan A. and Edith L. Wolff Charitable Trust, St. Louis, and the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation, St. Louis. The authors thank sonographer Peggy Brown for expert echocardiographic data acquisition, and the staff of the BJH Cardiovascular Procedure Center’s Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for their assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Kerry Hourigan oversaw the review of this article.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Simultaneous Acquisition of Echocardiographic and High Fidelity Hemodynamic Data
Before arterial access, in the catheterization laboratory, a full 2-D echo-Doppler study is performed by an ASE-certified sonographer in accordance with ASE criteria.29 After appropriate sterile skin prep and drape, local anesthesia (1% xylocaine) is given and percutaneous right or left femoral arterial access is obtained in preparation for catheterization and angiography, using a valved sheath (6-F, Arrow Inc, Reading, PA). After arterial access and placement of a 64-cm sheath (Arrow Inc, Reading, PA), a 6F micromanometer-tipped pigtail (triple pressure transducer) pressure–volume, conductance catheter (Model 560-1, 560-5, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) is directed into the mid-LV in a retrograde fashion across the aortic valve under fluoroscopic guidance. Before insertion, the manometer-tipped catheter is calibrated against “zero” by submersion just below the surface of NS bath at 37 °C, and again after insertion relative to hydrostatic “zero” using the lumen with respect to the mid-thoracic fluid-filled transducer (HP). It is balanced using a transducer control unit (Model TC-510, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX), and pressures are fed to the catheterization laboratory amplifier (Quinton Diagnostics, Bothell, WA or GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) and simultaneously into the input ports of the physiological amplifier of the Doppler imaging system for synchronization (Philips iE33). With the patient supine, apical 4-chamber views using a 2.5-MHz transducer are obtained by the sonographer, with the sample volume gated at 1.5–5 mm directed between the tips of the mitral valve leaflets and orthogonal to the MV plane. Continuous wave Doppler is used to record aortic outflow and mitral inflow from the apical view for determination of the lateral IVRT using a sweep speed of 10 cm/s. Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) of the medial and the lateral mitral annulus, and M-mode images are also recorded. To synchronize the hemodynamic data with the Doppler data a fiducial marker in the form of a square wave is fed from the catheter–transducer control unit. The LV and AO pressures, and LV volumes from the conductance catheter and one ECG channel are also simultaneously recorded on disk. Simultaneous Doppler data, LVP and conductance volume are obtained for a minimum of 30 consecutive beats during quiet respiration. After data acquisition, the diagnostic catheterization procedure is performed in the usual manner.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mossahebi, S., Kovács, S.J. Kinematic Modeling-based Left Ventricular Diastatic (Passive) Chamber Stiffness Determination with In-Vivo Validation. Ann Biomed Eng 40, 987–995 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0458-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0458-3