Abstract
Quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis is very useful for diagnosing dysfunctional neural states and for evaluating drug effects on the brain, among others. However, the bidirectional contamination between electrooculographic (EOG) and cerebral activities can mislead and induce wrong conclusions from EEG recordings. Different methods for ocular reduction have been developed but only few studies have shown an objective evaluation of their performance. For this purpose, the following approaches were evaluated with simulated data: regression analysis, adaptive filtering, and blind source separation (BSS). In the first two, filtered versions were also taken into account by filtering EOG references in order to reduce the cancellation of cerebral high frequency components in EEG data. Performance of these methods was quantitatively evaluated by level of similarity, agreement and errors in spectral variables both between sources and corrected EEG recordings. Topographic distributions showed that errors were located at anterior sites and especially in frontopolar and lateral–frontal regions. In addition, these errors were higher in theta and especially delta band. In general, filtered versions of time-domain regression and of adaptive filtering with RLS algorithm provided a very effective ocular reduction. However, BSS based on second order statistics showed the highest similarity indexes and the lowest errors in spectral variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderer P., H. V. Semlitsch, B. Saletu, M. J. Barbanoj 1992 Artifact processing in topographic of electro-encephalographic activity in neuropsychopharmacology. Psychiat. Res. 45, 79–93. doi:10.1016/0925-4927(92)90002-L
Barbati G., C. Porcaro, F. Zappasodi, P. M. Rossini, F. Tecchio 2004 Optimization of an independent component analysis approach for artifact identification and removal in magnetoencephalographic signals. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 1220–1232. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.015
Bell A. J., T. J. Sejnowski 1995 An information maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural. Comput. 7, 1129–1159. doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129
Belouchrani A., K. Abed-Meraim, J. F. Cardoso, E. Moulines 1997 A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45, 434–444. doi:10.1109/78.554307
Bland J. M., D. G. Altman 1996 Measurement error and correlation coefficients. Br. Med. J. 313, 41–42
Cichocki, A., S. Amari, K. Siwek, T. Tanaka, et al. ICALAB Toolboxes for Signal and Image Processing. Available from http://www.bsp.brain.riken.jp/ICALAB/. Accessed 10 March 2008
Croft R. J., R. J. Barry 2000 Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Neurophysiol. Clin. 30, 5–19. doi:10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00055-1
Delorme A., S. Makeig 2004 EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
Delorme A., T. Sejnowski, S. Makeig 2007 Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. Neuroimage 34, 1443–1449. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004
Gasser T., L. Sroka, J. Möcks 1985 The transfer of EOG activity into the EEG for eyes open and closed. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61, 181–193. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(85)91058-2
Gasser T., P. Ziegler, F. Gattaz 1992 The deleterious effect of ocular artifacts on the quantitative EEG, and a remedy. Eur. Arch. Psy. Clin. N. 241, 241–252. doi:10.1007/BF02191960
He P., G. Wilson, C. Russell 2004 Removal of ocular artifacts from electro-encephalography by adaptive filtering. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp. 42, 407–412. doi:10.1007/BF02344717
He P., G. Wilson, C. Russell, M. Gerschutz 2007 Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG: a comparison between time-domain regression and adaptive filtering method using simulated data. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp. 45, 495–503. doi:10.1007/s11517-007-0179-9
Hoyer D., B. Pompe, K. H. Chon, H. Hardraht, C. Wicher, U. Zwiener 2005 Mutual information function assesses autonomic information flow of heart rate dynamics at different time scales. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng. 52, 584–592
Hyvärinen A., E. Oja 1997 A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Comput. 9, 1483–1492. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1483
Hyvärinen A., J. Karhunen, E. Oja 2001 Independent Component Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 481 pp
Jackson, L. B. FIR filter design techniques. In: Digital Filters and Signal Processing, 3rd ed. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, pp. 301–307
Jung T.-P., S. Makeig, M. Westerfield, J. Townsend, E. Courchesne, T. J. Sejnowski 2000 Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111, 1745–1758
Kierkels J. J. M., G. J. M. van Boxtel, L. L. M. Vogten 2006 A model-based objective evaluation of eye movement correction in EEG recordings. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng. 53, 246–253
Lins O. G., T. W. Picton, P. Berg, M. Scherg 1993 Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials II: source dipoles and source components. Brain Topogr. 6, 65–78. doi:10.1007/BF01234128
Ljung L. 1999 System Identification—Theory for the User. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall, 609 pp
Makeig S., A. J. Bell, T.-P. Jung, T. J. Sejnowski 1996 Independent component analysis of electro-encephalographic data. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 8, 145–151
Malmivuo, J., and R. Plonsey. Volume source and volume conductor. In: Bioelectromagnetism. Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 133–147
Nunez P. L., R. Srinivasan 2006 Electric Fields of the Brain. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press
Romero S., M. A. Mañanas, M. J. Barbanoj 2008 A comparative study of automatic techniques for ocular artifact reduction in spontaneous EEG signals based on clinical target variables: a simulation case. Comput. Biol. Med. 38, 348–360. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.12.001
Saletu B., P. Anderer, K. Kinsperger, J. Grünberger 1987 Topographic brain mapping of EEG in neuropsychopharmacology—Part II. Clinical applications (pharmaco EEG mapping). Meth. Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 9, 385–408
Schlögl A., C. Keinrath, D. Zimmermann, R. Scherer, R. Leeb, G. Pfurtscheller 2007 A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings. Clin. Neurophyiol. 118, 98–104. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.003
Semlitsch H. W., P. Anderer, P. Schuster, O. Presslich 1986 A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23, 695–703. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
Sörnmo, L., and P. Laguna. EEG signal processing. In: Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications. Elsevier Academic Press, 2005, pp. 55–180
Vasegui, S. V. Adaptive filters. In: Advanced Digital Signal Processing and Noise Reduction, 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2000
Vigario R. N. 1997 Extraction of ocular artifacts from EEG using independent component analysis. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 103, 395–404. doi:10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00042-8
Wallstrom G. L., R. E. Kass, A. Miller, J. F. Cohn, A. F. Nathan 2004 Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG: a comparison of regression-based and component-based methods. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 53, 105–119. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.03.007
Woestenburg J. C., M. N. Verbaten, J. L. Slanger 1983 The removal of eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biol. Psychol. 16, 127–147. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(83)90059-5
Acknowledgment
This study was partially supported by CICYT (TEC2008-02754/TEC del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación) from Spain.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romero, S., Mañanas, M.A. & Barbanoj, M.J. Ocular Reduction in EEG Signals Based on Adaptive Filtering, Regression and Blind Source Separation. Ann Biomed Eng 37, 176–191 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9589-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9589-6