Abstract
Differences in nasal anatomy among human subjects may cause significant differences in respiratory airflow patterns and subsequent dosimetry of inhaled gases and particles in the respiratory tract. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to study inter-individual differences in nasal airflow among four healthy individuals. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were digitized and nasal-surface-area-to-volume ratios (SAVR) were calculated for 15 adults. Two males and two females, representative of the range of SAVR values, were selected for flow analysis. Nasal CFD models were constructed for each subject by a semi-automated process that provided input to a commercial mesh generator to generate structured hexahedral meshes (Gambit, Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH, USA). Steady-state inspiratory laminar airflow at 15 L/min was calculated using commercial CFD software (FIDAP, Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH, USA). Streamline patterns, velocities, and helicity values were compared. In all subjects, the majority of flow passed through the middle and ventral regions of the nasal passages; however, the amount and location of swirling flow differed among individuals. Cross-sectional flow allocation analysis also indicated inter-individual differences. Laboratory water–dye experiments confirmed streamlines and velocity magnitudes predicted by the computational model. These results suggest that significant inter-individual differences exist in bulk airflow patterns in the nose.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annals of the ICRP 24; ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) Publication 66. Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1994
Batchelor G. K. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967
Cheng Y.-S., Y. Yamada, H.-C. Yeh, D. L. Swift. Diffusional deposition of ultrafine aerosols in a human nasal cast. J. Aerosol. Sci. 19: 741–751, 1988. doi:10.1016/0021−8502(88)90009-2
Chung S. K., Y. R. Son, S. J. Shin, S. K. Kim. Nasal airflow during respiratory cycle. Am. J. Rhinol. 20: 379–384, 2006. doi:10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2890
Croce C., R. Fodil, M. Durand, G. Sbirlea-Apiou, G. Caillibotte, J. F. Papon, J. R. Blondeau, A. Coste, D. Isabey, B. Louis. In vitro experiments and numerical simulations of airflow in realistic nasal airway geometry. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34: 997–1007, 2006. doi:10.1007/s10439-006-9094-8
Elad D., S. Naftali, M. Rosenfeld, M. Wolf. Physical stresses at the air-wall interface of the human nasal cavity during breathing. J. Appl. Physiol. 100: 1003–1010, 2006. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01049.2005
Erikson K. M., D. C. Dorman, L. H. Lash, M. Aschner. Manganese inhalation by rhesus monkeys is associated with brain regional changes in biomarkers of neurotoxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 97: 459–466, 2007. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm044
FIDAP 1991. FIDAP Theoretical Manual. Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH
Grigioni M., C. Daniele, U. Morbiducci, C. Del Gaudio, G. D’Avenio, A. Balducci, V. Barbaro. A mathematical description of blood spiral flow in vessels: application to a numerical study of flow in arterial bending. J. Biomech. 38: 1275–1386, 2005
Guilmette R. A., Y. S. Cheng, W. C. Griffith. Characterizing the variability in adult human nasal airway dimensions. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 41(Suppl. 1): 491–496, 1997
Horschler I., M. Meinke, W. Schroder. Numerical simulation of the flow field in a model of the nasal cavity. Comput Fluid 32: 39–45, 2003. doi:10.1016/S0045-7930(01)00097-4
Kelly J. T., B. Asgharian, J. S. Kimbell, B. A. Wong. Particle deposition in human nasal airway replicas manufactured by different methods. Part I: Inertial regime particles. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 38: 1063–1071, 2004
Kelly J. T., A. K. Prasad, A. S. Wexler. Detailed flow patterns in the nasal cavity. J. Appl. Physiol. 89: 323–337, 2000
Keyhani K., P. W. Scherer, M. M. Mozell. Numerical simulation of airflow in the human nasal cavity. J. Biomech. Eng. 117: 429–441, 1995
Kim J. K., J-H. Yoon, C. H. Kim, T. W. Nam, D. B. Shim, H. A. Shin. Particle image velocimetry measurements for the study of nasal airflow. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 126: 282–287, 2006
Kimbell J. S., R. P. Subramaniam. Use of computational fluid dynamics models for dosimetry of inhaled gases in the nasal passages. Inhalat. Toxicol. 13: 325–334, 2001. doi:10.1080/08958370151126185
Lang J. Clinical Anatomy of the Nose, Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses. New York: Thieme Medical, 1989
Lindemann J., T. Keck, K. Wiesmiller, B. Sander, H.-J. Brambs, G. Rettinger, D. Pless. A numerical simulation of intranasal air temperature during inspiration. Laryngoscope 114: 1037–1041, 2004. doi:10.1097/00005537-200406000-00015
Liu Y., E. A. Matida, J. Gu, M. R. Johnson. Numerical simulation of aerosol deposition in a 3-D human nasal cavity using RANS, RANS/EIM, and LES. J. Aerosol. Sci. 28: 683–700, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.05.003
Longest P. W., S. Vinchurkar. Effects of mesh style and grid convergence on particle deposition in bifurcating airway models with comparisons to experimental data. Med. Eng. Phys. 29: 350–366, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.05.012
Martonen T. B., Z. Zhang, G. Yue, C. J. Musante. 3-D Particle transport within the human upper respiratory tract. J. Aerosol. Sci. 33: 1095–1110, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00060-5
Menache M. G., L. M. Hanna, E. A. Gross, S. R. Lou, S. J. Zinreich, D. A. Leopold, A. M. Jarabek, F. J. Miller. Upper respiratory tract surface areas and volumes of laboratory animals and humans: considerations for dosimetry models. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 50: 475–506, 1997. doi:10.1080/00984109708984003
Mlynski G., S. Grutzenmacher, S. Plontke, B. Mlynski, C. Lang. Correlation of nasal morphology and respiratory function. Rhinology 39: 197–201, 2001
Park, K. I., C. Burcker, and W. Limberg. Experimental study of velocity fields in a model of human nasal cavity by DPIV. In: Laser Anemometry Advances and Applications: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference. Karlsruhe, Germany: German Association for Laser Anemometry GALA e.V., 1997, pp. 617–626
Shi H., C. Kleinstreuer, Z. Zhang. Laminar airflow and nanoparticle or vapor deposition in a human nasal cavity model. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME. 128: 697–706, 2006. doi:10.1115/1.2244574
Subramaniam R. P., R. B. Richardson, K. T. Morgan, J. S. Kimbell, R. A. Guilmette. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of inspiratory airflow in the human nose and nasopharynx. Inhalat. Toxicol. 10: 91–120, 1998. doi:10.1080/089583798197772
Weinhold N., G. Mlynski. Numerical simulation of airflow in the human nose. Eur. Arch. Oto-rhino-laryngol. 261: 452–455, 2004. doi:10.1007/s00405-003-0675-y
Zamankhan P., G. Ahmadi, Z. C. Wang, P. K. Hopke, Y. S. Cheng, W. C. Su, D. Leonard. Airflow and deposition of nano-particles in a human nasal cavity. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 40: 463–476, 2006. doi:10.1080/02786820600660903
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ray Guilmette for his contributions, help and support, and Earl Tewksbury and Brian Wong for pressure drop data. The authors also acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Darin Kalisak and Regina Richardson. Funding for this project was provided by the American Chemistry Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Segal, R.A., Kepler, G.M. & Kimbell, J.S. Effects of Differences in Nasal Anatomy on Airflow Distribution: A Comparison of Four Individuals at Rest. Ann Biomed Eng 36, 1870–1882 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9556-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9556-2