Skip to main content
Log in

In Silico Stochastic Network Models that Emulate the Molecular Sieving Characteristics of Bone

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies implicate bone’s extracellular matrix as a “living electrophoresis and ion exchange column’’ with low pass filter function at the matrix level; whereas small molecules pass through the matrix microporosity, larger molecules penetrate the tissue through the pericellular space. In this study, stochastic network modeling principles were applied, for the first time to our knowledge, to build in silico, nano- to microscale models of bone. Small volumes of bone were modeled to include hierarchical levels of porosity comprising the bone matrix microporosity and the pericellular network. Flow and transport through the network was calculated for molecules from 1,000 to 100,000 datons (Da). On the basis of this study, two contrasting effects determine the rate and direction of transport of different size molecules through the hierarchical porous network of bone. Whereas diffusivity of a given molecule decreases with increasing molecular size, the size exclusion effects of bone’s low pass molecular sieve translate into increasing flow velocities for large molecular species along transport paths located in the immediate vicinity of the cells. Both phenomena are expected to have a profound effect on the formation of molecular gradients at a tissue level, providing cues for tissue generation and repair by cellular “micromachines,’’ i.e., osteoclasts and osteoblasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cowin, S. C. Bone poroelasticity. J. Biomech. 32:217–238, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandez-Seara, M. A., S. L. Wehrli, and F. W. Wehrli. Diffusion of exchangeable water in cortical bone studied by nuclear magnetic resonance. Biophys. J. 82:522–529, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holmes, J. M., D. H. Davies, W. J. Meath, and R. A. Beebe. Gas adsorption and surface structure of bone mineral. Biochemistry 19:2019–2024, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kamioka, H., T. Honjo, and T. Takano-Yamamoto. A three-dimensional distribution of osteocyte processes revealed by the combination of confocal laser scanning microscopy and differential interference contrast microscopy. Bone 28:145–149, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Knothe Tate, M. L. Interstitial fluid flow. In: Bone Mechanics Handbook: Flow of fluids in bone, edited by S. C. Cowin. CRC Press, 2001, 22, pp. 1–29.

  6. Knothe Tate, M. L. Whither flows the fluid in bone? An osteocyte’s perspective. J. Biomech. 36:1409–1424, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Knothe Tate, M. L., and U. Knothe. An ex vivo model to study transport processes and fluid flow in loaded bone. J. Biomech. 33:247–254, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Knothe Tate, M. L., and P. Niederer. Theoretical FE-based model developed to predict the relative contribution of convective and diffusive transport mechanisms for the maintenance of local equilibria within cortical bone. Adv. Heat. Mass. Transf. Biotech. Trans. HTD-Vol 362/BED-Vol 40 edited by S. Clegg ASME. 133–142, 1998.

  9. Knothe Tate, M. L., P. Niederer, and U. Knothe. In vivo tracer transport through the lacunocanalicular system of rat bone in an environment devoid of mechanical loading. Bone 2:107–117, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knothe Tate, M. L., R. Steck, M. R. Forwood, and P. Niederer. In vivo demonstration of load-induced fluid flow in the rat tibia and its potential implications for processes associated with functional adaptation. J. Exp. Biol. 203:2737–2745, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Knothe Tate, M. L., A. E. Tami, T. W. Bauer, and U. Knothe. Micropathoanatomy of osteoporosis: Indications for a cellular basis of bone disease. Adv. Osteopor. Frac. Man. 2:9–14, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marotti, G., M. Ferretti, M. A. Muglia, C. Palumbo, and S. Palazzini. A quantitative evaluation of osteoblast-osteocyte relationships on growing endosteal surface of rabbit tibiae. Bone 13:363–368, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyers, J. J., and A. I. Liapis. Network modeling of the intraparticle convection and diffusion of molecules in porous particles packed in a chromatographic column. J. Chromat. 827:197–213, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mishra, S., and M. L. Knothe Tate. Effect of lacunocanalicular architecture on hydraulic conductance in bone tissue: Implications for bone health and evolution. Anat. Rec. 273A:752–762, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morris, M. A., J. A. Lopez-Curto, S. P. Hughes, K. N. An, J. B. Bassingthwaighte, and P. J. Kelly. Fluid spaces in canine bone and marrow. Microvasc. Res. 23:188–200, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neuman, W. F., and M. W. Neuman. The Chemical Dynamics of Bone. University of Chicago Press, 1958.

  17. Neuman, W. F., T. Y. Toribara, and B. J. Mulvran. The surface chemistry of bone. VII The hydration shell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75:4239–4242, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oliver, J. D., III, S. Anderson, J. L. Troy, B. M. Brenner, and W. H. Deen. Determination of glomerular size-selectivity in the normal rat with Ficoll. J. Am. Soc. Nephr. 3:214–228, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oliver, J. D., III, and W. M. Deen. Random-coil model for glomerular sieving of dextran. Bull. Math. Biol. 56:369–389, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Power, J., N. Loveridge, N. Rushton, M. Parker, and J. Reeve. Osteocyte density in aging subjects is enhanced in bone adjacent to remodeling haversian systems. Bone 30:859–865, 2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Qin, Y. X., T. Kaplan, A. Saldanha, and C. Rubin. Fluid pressure gradients, arising from oscillations in intramedullary pressure, is correlated with the formation of bone and inhibition of intracortical porosity. J. Biomech. 36:1427–1437, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qin, Y. X., K. J. Mcleod, M. W. Otter, and C. T. Rubin. The interdependent role of loading frequency, intracortical fluid pressure and pressure gradients in guiding site-specific bone adaptation. Trans. 44th Ann. Meetors. 544, p. 1998.

  23. Robinson, R. A. Observations regarding compartments for tracer calcium in the body. In: Bone Biodynamics, edited by H. M. Frost. London: Churchill Publishers, 1964, pp. 423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saltzman, W. M., and R. Langer. Transport rates of proteins in porous materials with known microgeometry. Biophys. J. 55:163–171, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stauffer, D., and A. Aharony. Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor & Francis Ltd, 1994.

  26. Tami, A. E., M. B. Schaffler, and M. L. Knothe Tate. Probing the tissue to subcellular level structure underlying bone’s molecular sieving function. Biorheology 40:577–590, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vashishth, D., O. Verborgt, G. Divine, M. B. Schaffler, and D. P. Fyhrie. Decline in osteocyte lacunar density in human cortical bone is associated with accumulation of microcracks with age. Bone 26:375–380, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan, F., A. Krol, and S. Tong. Available space and extracellular transport of macromolecules: Effects of pore size and connectedness. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 29:1150–1158, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson, E. J., S. Kaliyamoorthy, J. I. D. Alexander, and M. L. Knothe Tate. Nano-microscale models of periosteocytic flow show differences in stress imported to cell body and processes. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa L. Knothe Tate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steck, R., Tate, M.L.K. In Silico Stochastic Network Models that Emulate the Molecular Sieving Characteristics of Bone. Ann Biomed Eng 33, 87–94 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-8966-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-8966-7

Navigation